Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 28, 7:28*am, gfn wrote:
On May 28, 10:19*am, "Scout" wrote: "gfn" wrote in message .... On May 27, 6:11 pm, "Scout" wrote: "gfn" wrote in message ... On May 27, 3:35 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote : On May 27, 12:57 pm, RD Sandman wrote: gfn wrote innews:32f5e241-6e60-4d14-bfa8-cae2d3698f3e@ 24g2000yqk.googlegroups.com: On May 26, 8:06 pm, "Scout" wrote: "gfn" wrote in message m. .. On May 26, 4:04 pm, Gray Ghost wrote: gfn wrote in news:cd664af5-c0a8-4200-a50e-2cdb60b5a 031 @w21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com: On May 26, 3:20 pm, Gray Ghost wrote: gfn wrote in news:5e36036b-9c38-4449-8578- : Under the FairTax - * * wholesale = $50 - * * compliance costs = - $23 - * * FairTax = $23 - * * sales and other taxes = $27 - * * Grand total = $100 You are obviously a Democrat. Then Herman Cain must be too because he supports the FairTax. -- Herman Cain for President! * * * * * * *http://her man cain.c om/ If you don't support him you are a Racist!! He beat Cancer. He'll beat Obama (who is just like cancer) Remember Desert One, Carter 0? Ain't it sad to wish that Obama had as muc h ambition but being glad he doesn't knowing he doesn't have THAT muc h competence? I refer to your math. wholesale = $50 compliance costs = - $23 FairTax = $23 sales and other taxes = $27 Unless they changed the rules of math by Congressionl decree that's $1 23. You can refer to my math, in return I will refer to your reading comprehension. *Was there something about "- $23" (read minus $23) that you didn't get? *I guess the example wasn't simple enough for you. Yep, and HOW exactly do you assume that compliance with sales and other taxes will suddenly be reduced to zero, when they will still need to comp ly and that it will cost absolutely NOTHING to comply with the additional FairTax imposed? You need to understand what compliance costs actually are. *They are the costs associated with complying with the federal income tax on wages, regressive payroll taxes , the federal income tax on wages, i.e. measuring, tracking, sheltering, documenting, and filing our annual income.. *If those taxes are gone then just what exactly is there left to comply with and how does that cost any money? There are also state compliance costs associated with state income taxes for employees, inventory taxes, license renewals, etc.. *Fair tax does nothing about them. *In addition you also have some compliance taxes fo r the operation of the Fair Tax....someone has to pay it. Because that has to do with state taxes. *The FairTax is about federal taxation. The point is that those costs are still there. *They were somewhat amortized when combined with federal taxation but even if that goes away, the mechanisms of collecting those taxes don't. The costs of production are there. *The costs of compliance are no longer there. EPA isn't going to be there anymore? OSHA isn't going to be there anymore? Workman's Comp isn't going to be there anymore? Unemployment Benefits aren't going to be there anymore? The need to comply with state/local tax requirements aren't going to be there anymore? You just can't wave your magic wand and claim all these things are going away when they aren't. With all due respect, what the hell are you talking about? *I never claimed these things would go away. *Go read the fairtax site so you can come in to this discussion with at least a tacit understanding of it. Sorry, but it's your job to support your claims and to present any specific information needed to that end. It's not my job to good read up on a topic you wish to discuss simply because you can't be bothered to present and support your views. Look, I said repeatedly that the fairtax replaces federal income taxes including personal, estate, gift, capital gains, alternative minimum, Social Security, Medicare, self-employment, and corporate taxes and the compliance costs associated with them. *You come out of left field with this EPA and OSHA nonsense. *It has no connection. *It's like trying to prove a negative. I agree to a point, but not all compliance costs will be eliminated. Take Social Security, for example. While the tax collection aspect will be eliminated for employers, the requirement to report income to the Federal Government will not, since SS benefits are dependent on that information. State income taxes have been mentioned in this thread, and before you say it, I know the Fair Tax deals with Federal taxes only. However, State income taxes rely on the Federal income tax framework, so there's bound to be some slop-over in compliance costs there. Perhaps this has been taken into consideration. Also, as has been mentioned, administration (collection, reporting, and so on) of sales tax by business entities constitute a compliance cost. (If you have ever had to administer sales tax for a State, you'll know what I mean.) Perhaps this also has been taken into consideration. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS? | Shortwave | |||
Creating Wealth ? -or- Redistributing The Wealth ! | Shortwave | |||
Moving Money Around Is Clearly Wealth Redistribution {Redistributingthe Wealth} | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity in financial mayhem | Shortwave | |||
iBiquity's Financial Mayhem ! | Shortwave |