In article , says...

On 5/30/2011 12:42 AM, Ron wrote:
On May 29, 12:05 pm, John wrote:
On 5/29/2011 9:27 AM, Ron wrote:









On May 29, 10:41 am, John wrote:
On 5/29/2011 8:36 AM, Ron wrote:

On May 29, 10:28 am, John wrote:
On 5/29/2011 8:25 AM, Ron wrote:

On May 29, 2:46 am, John wrote:
The whitehouse goes about screaming, "IT'S REAL! IT'S REAL!"

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/...mas-long-form-...

Then you look at what the experts, who have examined it say, at it is
just the same old nine-layered fraud!

I guess this is all they have left, the hope that the majority of the
people are too stupid to realize the crime(s.)

Regards,
JS
.
.
John....John........JOHN!

The horse is dead.

The horse will be dead when obama stands in court to answer for the
fraudulent 9 layered document!

Kinda like counterfeiting, it ain't over until you pay for your crime
... now, some people might not thing it is counterfeiting if the
president does it (what nixon said), BUT IT IS!

Regards,
JS
.
.
John I've asked you before, but you don't answer. How did two
Hawaiian newspapers get the Obama birth announcement?
Why didn't John McCain's staff find any discrepancies? Why did a
Republican governor of Hawaii affirm the US birth? Why did Congress
pass a resolution proclaiming Hawaii as Obama's birthplace?

Huh?

Brain dead mccain couldn't find the prize in a cracker jack box, why no
one voted for him ...

First, Ann and obama senior were never married, and never lived together
in Hawaii. (There is no marriage certificate for obama sr and Ann.)

Second, the address associated with the announcement is the grandparents.

... and ...

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=104678

Regards,
JS
.
.
Brain dead mccain couldn't find the prize in a cracker jack box,
why no one voted for him .

McCain didn't do the investigation. It was conducted by members of
his staff.

First, Ann and obama senior were never married, and never lived
together in Hawaii

Even if true, how does that disprove Hawaii as Obama's place of birth?

Second, the address associated with the announcement is the
grandparents.

Once again, the same question. Even if true, how does that disprove
the place of birth?

You are the one claiming that an announcement in a newspaper is some
type of legal and binding document which would risk prosecution, fine or
punishment if "doctored."

I am the one pointing out that an announcement in a newspaper means
nothing ...

Regards,
JS
.
.
No, no, John-boy. I asked you to explain how the birth announcements
were printed in two newspapers.

How did Obama's mom do it, and show us proof that she did do it that
way.


Nothing about the newspaper is worthy of any consideration, not by sane
men, and certainly not by a court of law.

"Similarly, the newspaper announcements of Obama's birth do not prove he
was born in Hawaii, since they could have been triggered by the
grandparents registering the birth as Hawaiian, even if the baby was
born elsewhere."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE...&pageId=252833

If you are attempting to prove something with an announcement in a
newspapers, from the 1960's, it is a sign you have and will lose
whatever arguments you are attempting ...

Why would you not argue your case with valid documents, evidence and proofs?

You really need something concrete ... I don't think anyone is going to
give much validity to newspapers, one way or another ...

Regards,
JS

Every time you post something about the BC thing, you prove how clueless
you are. Youreally don't understand how anything really works, do you,
Johnny KooK?

The birth announcements come from the hospital, you idiot.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!