|
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote:
joeturn wrote : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...layer_embedded There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from the survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote:
joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - - -- - Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) - - If you woke up this morning.... - Don't complain. awaken,,, Awaken... AWAKEN ! ! ! ? Obama-Regime Planing a False Flag Attack on the Sears Towers in Chicago... http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dfe518ff642d0b |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On May 31, 11:23*pm, joeturn wrote:
On May 31, 7:06*pm, RHF wrote: On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - - -- - Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) - - If you woke up this morning.... - Don't complain. awaken,,, Awaken... AWAKEN ! ! ! ? Obama-Regime Planing a False Flag Attack on the Sears Towers in Chicago...http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dfe518ff642d0b *. -read- ? Will There Be A New False Flag Attack In Chicago's Sears Tower ! *Source* Gerald Celente whttp://www.opednews.com/Diary/Will-There-Be-A-New-False-by-Saman-Moha... *. *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Instead of having the false flag in Chicago they simply killed Osama again. This guy has miraculously(Spell Check **** #2 TIA)survived three deaths so far?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' . |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 1, 12:57*am, wrote:
On May 31, 11:23*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 31, 7:06*pm, RHF wrote: On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon.. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - - -- - Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) - - If you woke up this morning.... - Don't complain. awaken,,, Awaken... AWAKEN ! ! ! ? Obama-Regime Planing a False Flag Attack on the Sears Towers in Chicago...http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dfe518ff642d0b *. -read- ? Will There Be A New False Flag Attack In Chicago's Sears Tower ! *Source* Gerald Celente whttp://www.opednews.com/Diary/Will-There-Be-A-New-False-by-Saman-Moha... *. *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Instead of having the false flag in Chicago they simply killed Osama again. This guy has miraculously(Spell Check **** #2 TIA)survived three deaths so far?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And is not dead yet. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuMShxAq7XQ |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
And he is still not dead.Barry Little was a CIA agent with the code
name Tim Osman http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuMShxAq7XQ On Jun 1, 12:57*am, wrote: On May 31, 11:23*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 31, 7:06*pm, RHF wrote: On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon.. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - - -- - Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) - - If you woke up this morning.... - Don't complain. awaken,,, Awaken... AWAKEN ! ! ! ? Obama-Regime Planing a False Flag Attack on the Sears Towers in Chicago...http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dfe518ff642d0b *. -read- ? Will There Be A New False Flag Attack In Chicago's Sears Tower ! *Source* Gerald Celente whttp://www.opednews.com/Diary/Will-There-Be-A-New-False-by-Saman-Moha... *. *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Instead of having the false flag in Chicago they simply killed Osama again. This guy has miraculously(Spell Check **** #2 TIA)survived three deaths so far?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On May 31, 9:23*pm, joeturn wrote:
On May 31, 7:06*pm, RHF wrote: On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - - -- - Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) - - If you woke up this morning.... - Don't complain. awaken,,, Awaken... AWAKEN ! ! ! ? Obama-Regime Planing a False Flag Attack on the Sears Towers in Chicago...http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dfe518ff642d0b *. -read- ? Will There Be A New False Flag Attack In Chicago's Sears Tower ! *Source* Gerald Celente whttp://www.opednews.com/Diary/Will-There-Be-A-New-False-by-Saman-Moha... *. *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Instead of having the false flag in Chicago they simply killed Osama again. This guy has miraculously(Spell Check **** #2 TIA)survived three deaths so far? No, ****wit. Please try to acquire a brain. You have an IQ registering in the negative range. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On May 31, 10:57*pm, wrote:
Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debrisoutward!
On 11-06-01 08:16 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ar-terror.html The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 1, 5:29*pm, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. You can't argue with FACTS, even though that's what you moron twoofers do day in and day out. SPECULATION by people does not constitute FACT, idiot. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 1, 7:29*pm, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM, Iarnrod wrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Have you saw this ?She lost her life for telling the truth! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Unych...layer_embedded |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debrisoutward!
On 11-06-01 08:42 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, "Moron twoofers"? You can't argue with FACTS, even though that's what you moron twoofers do day in and day out. Those are factual cites of expert opinion of the day. SPECULATION by people does not constitute FACT, idiot. No such claim has been made, All that has occurred is that evidence of credible experts opining regarding bin Laden's status was disseminated through the mainstream media. Let's return now to your claim, that "Moron twoofers" were "running around" and feeding some kind of "echo chamber". The real world tote shows we have: 1. The FBI's counter-terrorism chief. 2. A former US intelligence officer and BU profesor. 3. The foremost bin Laden exert and a Duke professor. 4. A political analyst and a philosophy professor. Somehow, even in your fevered mind, I doubt you can truly make the case that these sources are all: a. "Morons" b. "Twoofers" But feel free to sacrifice your own meager credibility upon your self-made alter of rank egoism, as is your regular wont here. And understand that there are several other government spokespersons who claimed the bin Laden tapes to be fake and opined as well that he was deceased. -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
"corneal pye" wrote in message ... On 11-06-01 08:42 PM, Iarnrod wrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, "Moron twoofers"? You can't argue with FACTS, even though that's what you moron twoofers do day in and day out. Those are factual cites of expert opinion of the day. SPECULATION by people does not constitute FACT, idiot. No such claim has been made, All that has occurred is that evidence of credible experts opining regarding bin Laden's status was disseminated through the mainstream media. Let's return now to your claim, that "Moron twoofers" were "running around" and feeding some kind of "echo chamber". The real world tote shows we have: 1. The FBI's counter-terrorism chief. 2. A former US intelligence officer and BU profesor. 3. The foremost bin Laden exert and a Duke professor. 4. A political analyst and a philosophy professor. Yep, and absolutely NONE of them stated that Osama was positively, absolutely and conclusively dead. They all included wiggle words, such as appears, or seems, or based on the evidence, etc. In short NONE of them stated he was factually DEAD. Further, most of them seemed to be expressing their OPINION of his status rather than any factual knowledge that they absolutely knew he was dead. Really, until you can separate opinion from fact, and not overlook the wiggle words that turns a statement into something non-conclusive or binding, you're never going to be able to separate out what is actually factual from mere assertions. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 1, 11:05*pm, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d.... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, *"Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Hint: You have nothing. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? chuckle |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 1, 9:15*am, Iarnrod wrote:
On May 31, 9:23*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 31, 7:06*pm, RHF wrote: On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon.. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - - -- - Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) - - If you woke up this morning.... - Don't complain. awaken,,, Awaken... AWAKEN ! ! ! ? Obama-Regime Planing a False Flag Attack on the Sears Towers in Chicago...http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dfe518ff642d0b *. -read- ? Will There Be A New False Flag Attack In Chicago's Sears Tower ! *Source* Gerald Celente whttp://www.opednews.com/Diary/Will-There-Be-A-New-False-by-Saman-Moha... *. *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Instead of having the false flag in Chicago they simply killed Osama again. This guy has miraculously(Spell Check **** #2 TIA)survived three deaths so far? No, ****wit. Please try to acquire a brain. You have an IQ registering in the negative range.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here is a pic of him before he under-went cosmetic sugery and became president. http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/h...07/09/suit.jpg Here is the Islamic community denying his existance! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UGXV...layer_embedded Lamerod your easy! |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 3, 5:10*am, joeturn wrote:
On Jun 1, wrote: On May 31, 9:23*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 31, 7:06*pm, RHF wrote: On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - - -- - Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) - - If you woke up this morning.... - Don't complain. awaken,,, Awaken... AWAKEN ! ! ! ? Obama-Regime Planing a False Flag Attack on the Sears Towers in Chicago...http://groups.google.com/group/rec.....dfe518ff642d0b *. -read- ? Will There Be A New False Flag Attack In Chicago's Sears Tower ! *Source* Gerald Celente whttp://www.opednews.com/Diary/Will-There-Be-A-New-False-by-Saman-Moha... *. *.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Instead of having the false flag in Chicago they simply killed Osama again. This guy has miraculously(Spell Check **** #2 TIA)survived three deaths so far? No, ****wit. Please try to acquire a brain. You have an IQ registering in the negative range.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Here is a pic of him before he under-went cosmetic sugery and became president. http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/h...tent/uploads/2... Here is the Islamic community denying his existance! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0UGXV...layer_embedded Lamerod your easy! WrongTurnJoe, please put down the crack pipe and go into detox. You're amazing, as far as comedy gold goes, but we're all starting to really worry about you. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 3, 10:04*am, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d.... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, *"Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Hint: You lose, and you lose big-time. You have cited NOTHING except people expressing GUESSES and OPINIONS. EPIC FAIL. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debrisoutward!
On 11-06-03 10:32 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, "Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Nothing you would have bathed in... Hint: You lose, and you lose big-time. I do?!??? You have cited NOTHING except people expressing GUESSES and OPINIONS. You called them "Moron twoofers". Is that definitive applicable to the head of the FBI's own counter-terrorism unit? Eh? Is it???? EPIC FAIL. Yours, yes. -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 4, 1:04*am, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-03 10:32 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid *wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * * *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, *"Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Nothing you would have bathed in... The FACT that I have proven all my claims and debunked yours sort of makes you look like a silly little boy here, kooker. you're circling the drain. Hint: You lose, and you lose big-time. I do?!??? Well, uh, yeah. You have cited NOTHING except people expressing GUESSES and OPINIONS. You called them "Moron twoofers". As they are if they claimed UBL was already dead.. Obviously, he was not. Is that definitive applicable to the head of the FBI's own counter-terrorism unit? Eh? Is it???? He did not claim UBL was dead, fuzznuts. EPIC FAIL. Yours, yes. Nope, yours. Not in dispute. The fact that we killed UBL last month sorta means you're an idiot and he was not dead before that. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debrisoutward!
On 11-06-04 07:24 PM, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jun 4, 1:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-03 10:32 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, "Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Nothing you would have bathed in... The FACT that I have proven all my claims and debunked yours sort of makes you look like a silly little boy here, kooker. you're circling the drain. Your claim was that all these people who said bin Laden was dead are "Moron twoofers". I state again, you have NOT proved that and even you are not foolish enough to call the FBI's counter-terrorism chief a "Moron twoofer". Game over. Hint: You lose, and you lose big-time. I do?!??? Well, uh, yeah. Only in your delusions. You have cited NOTHING except people expressing GUESSES and OPINIONS. You called them "Moron twoofers". As they are if they claimed UBL was already dead.. Obviously, he was not. So you are publicly stating that Dale Watson is a "Moron twoofer"? Is that your FINAL answer? I think you have no clue what constitutes a "twoofer". Is that definitive applicable to the head of the FBI's own counter-terrorism unit? Eh? Is it???? He did not claim UBL was dead, fuzznuts. Ah so now the real squirming begins...he said he was "probably dead". So we can say he was "probably" wrong. But you will NEVER indict him as a "twoofer". So stop trying. EPIC FAIL. Yours, yes. Nope, yours. Not in dispute. Sorry you made claims you can't prove, sad it troubles you so much you can never admit it. The fact that we killed UBL last month sorta means you're an idiot and he was not dead before that. The "fact" changes nothing in hindsight. At each stage of his tape dissemination there have been credible governmental experts who claimed that the tapes we a. not him b. composites c. old recordings And thereby questioned if he was still alive. The people who did this were not "twoofers" they were defense analysts and that was there considered expert opinion at THOSE times. Nothing you can say here will rewrite history, so just quit acting like a petulant child. -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 4, 7:20*pm, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-04 07:24 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 4, 1:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid *wrote: On 11-06-03 10:32 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * *wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * * *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * * * *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, *"Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Nothing you would have bathed in... The FACT that I have proven all my claims and debunked yours sort of makes you look like a silly little boy here, kooker. you're circling the drain. Your claim was that all these people who said bin Laden was dead are "Moron twoofers". They are. I state again, you have NOT proved that and even you are not foolish enough to call the FBI's counter-terrorism chief a "Moron twoofer". He did not claim that UBL was dead. I said, as you noted, that those who claim he was dead before he was killed are moron twoofers. This is beyond dispute. People who expressed opinions or guessed that he might be dead prior to his actually being dead are not claiming he was dead. Please acquire some comprehension skills and I might not have to repeatedly kick your stupid ass. Game over. And I won. Hint: You lose, and you lose big-time. I do?!??? Well, uh, yeah. Only in your delusions. In reality. You are deluded. You have cited NOTHING except people expressing GUESSES and OPINIONS. You called them "Moron twoofers". As they are if they claimed UBL was already dead.. Obviously, he was not. So you are publicly stating that Dale Watson is a "Moron twoofer"? Is that your FINAL answer? I think you have no clue what constitutes a "twoofer". Is that definitive applicable to the head of the FBI's own counter-terrorism unit? Eh? Is it???? He did not claim UBL was dead, fuzznuts. Ah so now the real squirming begins... By you. he said he was "probably dead". THANK YOU for kicking your own ass and saving me the effort. You just admitted you were wrong. He was guessing. He was not asserting a claim, you ****in' moron. NOW that you have kicked your own ass, do you see where you made your error? So we can say he was "probably" wrong. We can say he was, in fact, since UBL was only recently killed. But you will NEVER indict him as a "twoofer". Why would I? He isn't. He didn't claim UBL was dead. YOU claimed that he said that but now you admit he did not say that. So stop trying. BWAHAHAHHAHAAHAAA!!! You're begging for mercy when I now have you backtracking so deliciously? No quarter, dearie. EPIC FAIL. Yours, yes. Nope, yours. Not in dispute. Sorry you made claims you can't prove, I proved them of course, and you just changed your claim and admitted you lied. sad it troubles you so much you can never admit it. I admit I kicked your ass as you now overtly admit. The fact that we killed UBL last month sorta means you're an idiot and he was not dead before that. The "fact" changes nothing in hindsight. At each stage of his tape dissemination there have been credible governmental experts who claimed that the tapes we a. not him b. composites c. old recordings No there weren't. And thereby questioned if he was still alive. Thank you for ADMITTING once again that they did not CLAIM that he was dead, as you originally LIED. The people who did this were not "twoofers" they were defense analysts and that was there considered expert opinion at THOSE times. O-P-I-N-I-O-N Suggest you have mommy explain to you the difference between stating an opinion and asserting a claim. (You're making this WAAAAAAY to easy for me!) Nothing you can say here will rewrite history, Nor would I want to since history backs up my claims and contradicts yours, as you yourself just backtracked. so just quit acting like a petulant child. I just kicked your whiny goal-post-shifting ass, moron. It was easy. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debrisoutward!
On 11-06-05 01:12 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jun 4, 7:20 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-04 07:24 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 4, 1:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-03 10:32 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, "Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Nothing you would have bathed in... The FACT that I have proven all my claims and debunked yours sort of makes you look like a silly little boy here, kooker. you're circling the drain. Your claim was that all these people who said bin Laden was dead are "Moron twoofers". They are. So you claim the FBI's counter-terrorism chief is a "twoofer", is that your final answer? I state again, you have NOT proved that and even you are not foolish enough to call the FBI's counter-terrorism chief a "Moron twoofer". He did not claim that UBL was dead. He said "probably dead", which in the absence of a corpus delecti is the same thing. I said, as you noted, that those who claim he was dead before he was killed are moron twoofers. This is beyond dispute. People who expressed opinions or guessed that he might be dead prior to his actually being dead are not claiming he was dead. Pathetic squirm. Please acquire some comprehension skills and I might not have to repeatedly kick your stupid ass. Game over. And I won. "Former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla" is a "twofer" too? Hint: You lose, and you lose big-time. I do?!??? Well, uh, yeah. Only in your delusions. In reality. You are deluded. You are a serial liar. You have cited NOTHING except people expressing GUESSES and OPINIONS. You called them "Moron twoofers". As they are if they claimed UBL was already dead.. Obviously, he was not. So you are publicly stating that Dale Watson is a "Moron twoofer"? Is that your FINAL answer? I think you have no clue what constitutes a "twoofer". Is that definitive applicable to the head of the FBI's own counter-terrorism unit? Eh? Is it???? He did not claim UBL was dead, fuzznuts. Ah so now the real squirming begins... By you. More lies from you. he said he was "probably dead". THANK YOU for kicking your own ass and saving me the effort. You just admitted you were wrong. Nope. I just showed you credentialed insiders believed him to be dead and said as much. He was guessing. Nope, a "guess" is an uneducated speculation. The people I listed were educated analysts. He was not asserting a claim, you ****in' moron. NOW that you have kicked your own ass, do you see where you made your error? And what of: Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) So we can say he was "probably" wrong. We can say he was, in fact, since UBL was only recently killed. Allegedly, as we yet lack any verifiable physical evidence. But you will NEVER indict him as a "twoofer". Why would I? He isn't. He didn't claim UBL was dead. YOU claimed that he said that but now you admit he did not say that. His claim, sans a corpse, was that he was "probably dead". His claim was totally unambiguous. So stop trying. BWAHAHAHHAHAAHAAA!!! You're begging for mercy when I now have you backtracking so deliciously? No quarter, dearie. Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' EPIC FAIL. Yours, yes. Nope, yours. Not in dispute. Sorry you made claims you can't prove, I proved them of course, and you just changed your claim and admitted you lied. Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) sad it troubles you so much you can never admit it. I admit I kicked your ass as you now overtly admit. Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) The fact that we killed UBL last month sorta means you're an idiot and he was not dead before that. The "fact" changes nothing in hindsight. At each stage of his tape dissemination there have been credible governmental experts who claimed that the tapes we a. not him b. composites c. old recordings No there weren't. You really do like getting your ass kicked: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2526309.stm Researchers in Switzerland have questioned the authenticity of the recent audio recording attributed to Osama Bin Laden. A team from the Lausanne-based Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence, Idiap, said it was 95% certain the tape does not feature the voice of the al-Qaeda leader. And thereby questioned if he was still alive. Thank you for ADMITTING once again that they did not CLAIM that he was dead, as you originally LIED. Probably dead = probably not alive = unambiguous. Also: Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' The people who did this were not "twoofers" they were defense analysts and that was there considered expert opinion at THOSE times. O-P-I-N-I-O-N EXPERT "opinion". Suggest you have mommy explain to you the difference between stating an opinion and asserting a claim. (You're making this WAAAAAAY to easy for me!) You're spinning like a top now. Nothing you can say here will rewrite history, Nor would I want to since history backs up my claims and contradicts yours, as you yourself just backtracked. Nope, credible experts made statement indicating he was dead, cope. so just quit acting like a petulant child. I just kicked your whiny goal-post-shifting ass, moron. It was easy. You did what you always do when trapped, spin, obfuscate, lie and deny. Whose payroll are you on anyway? -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
"corneal pye" wrote in message ... On 11-06-05 01:12 AM, Iarnrod wrote: On Jun 4, 7:20 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-04 07:24 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 4, 1:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-03 10:32 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, "Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Nothing you would have bathed in... The FACT that I have proven all my claims and debunked yours sort of makes you look like a silly little boy here, kooker. you're circling the drain. Your claim was that all these people who said bin Laden was dead are "Moron twoofers". They are. So you claim the FBI's counter-terrorism chief is a "twoofer", is that your final answer? I state again, you have NOT proved that and even you are not foolish enough to call the FBI's counter-terrorism chief a "Moron twoofer". He did not claim that UBL was dead. He said "probably dead", which in the absence of a corpus delecti is the same thing. "probably dead" is NOT the same thing as "is dead". Until you can separate fact from assertion and factual statement from opinion, you're never going to be able to recognize when someone is telling you what is true from what they simply hope is true. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 5, 10:32*am, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-05 01:12 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 4, 7:20 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid *wrote: On 11-06-04 07:24 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 4, 1:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * *wrote: On 11-06-03 10:32 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * * *wrote: On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * * * *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid * * * * *wrote: On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote: On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote: Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the heavily publicized 2011 'death' ... No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate claim. It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities at you. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- Yes, all obviously were wrong. But were they, to quote your claim, *"Moron twoofers"? So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well. Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies as 911 "twoof"? Care to CITE those publications? Don't you feel stupid even bringing it up? Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief" isn't exactly a weak resource, now is it? Well...IS it? Hint: You have nothing. I have timely cites OF the day. You have hindsight. Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history. Cope. You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS. The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron twoofers". Care to DISPUTE that? Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality? No, that seems to be your dissonance. chuckle Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can you quantify as "Moron twoofers"? This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you silly twit. Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of TRUTH. Nothing you would have bathed in... The FACT that I have proven all my claims and debunked yours sort of makes you look like a silly little boy here, kooker. you're circling the drain. Your claim was that all these people who said bin Laden was dead are "Moron twoofers". They are. So you claim the FBI's counter-terrorism chief is a "twoofer", is that your final answer? So you are going to CONTINUE to be a short-bus rider by failing at reading comprehension? Is THAT your final answer? Hint: As you yourself ADMITTED TO LYING, he did NOT claim that UBL was dead. Now you are BACTRACKING on the only honest admission you have made? BWAHAAAHAAAAHAHAHAAAA!!! I have to admit, you are the most stupid kook I have bashed in quite some time! I state again, you have NOT proved that and even you are not foolish enough to call the FBI's counter-terrorism chief a "Moron twoofer". He did not claim that UBL was dead. He said "probably dead", Aha!! So once aganin you are swinging back to my side and ADMITTING that he DID NOT CLAIM UBL was dead byut only proposed a guess, a speculation, an OPINION. I've been suggesting that, as your hero Bush would say, you "edjumacate" yourself on the differences between asserting a claim and stating an opinion. You might spare the need for me to kick your stupid kooker ass. which in the absence of a corpus delecti is the same thing. It is not even close to the same thing. Stating a claim would cross the line between opinion and factual assertion. I understand that to someone as dense as you who constantly fabricates and lies, they seem like the same but to people with what we like to call "brains," they are not. I said, as you noted, that those who claim he was dead before he was killed are moron twoofers. This is beyond dispute. People who expressed opinions or guessed that he might be dead prior to his actually being dead are not claiming he was dead. Pathetic squirm. By you. It is simply FACT that people stating an opinion are not stating a factual claim but asserting their GUESS. Gawd, but you're a stupid one. Is it from a lifetime of sniffing glue or from a lifetime of being a rightarded moron? Please acquire some comprehension skills and I might not have to repeatedly kick your stupid ass. Game over. And I won. "Former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla" is a "twofer" too? When he expressed his "opinion" in 2009, after Obama took office, that UBL most probably was dead? I didn't see an actual claim from him. You're good at finding things that aren't there... why don't YOU try? BWAHAAHAAAHAHAHAHA!! Incidentally, he does seem to be one of your fellow rightards so perhaps he IS a moron twoofer. Does he believe Bush blew up the twin towers too? snicker Hint: You lose, and you lose big-time. I do?!??? Well, uh, yeah. Only in your delusions. In reality. You are deluded. You are a serial liar. Your statement in itself is a lie. You cannot point to one single word of mine that is a lie whilst *I* have exposed every single one of your statements as fatally flawed. You have ONLY lied. You have cited NOTHING except people expressing GUESSES and OPINIONS. You called them "Moron twoofers". As they are if they claimed UBL was already dead.. Obviously, he was not. So you are publicly stating that Dale Watson is a "Moron twoofer"? Is that your FINAL answer? I think you have no clue what constitutes a "twoofer". Is that definitive applicable to the head of the FBI's own counter-terrorism unit? Eh? Is it???? He did not claim UBL was dead, fuzznuts. Ah so now the real squirming begins... By you. More lies from you. More dancing away by you, in your complete and utter inability to point to one single thing I have said that is a lie, while I have been proving all of your statements to be lies. Hint: Your desperation is palpable. he said he was "probably dead". THANK YOU for kicking your own ass and saving me the effort. You just admitted you were wrong. Nope. Yep. I just showed you credentialed insiders believed him to be dead and said as much. Uh, moron. Clue? Hint: "Believed..." There's that troublesome word again that proves you wrong. They did NOT say that he was dead. they stated their OPINION. They did NOT make the factual assertion that he was dead. You DID admit you were wrong and it seems you're too stupid even to know it. He was guessing. Nope, a "guess" is an uneducated speculation. "Speculation." Look it up, ****-for-brains. The people I listed were educated analysts. Stating a belief and opinion but not making factual assertions. I know that you want ever so much for this to be different but no amount of repeated assertion by you will ever change an opinion to a fact. He was not asserting a claim, you ****in' moron. NOW that you have kicked your own ass, do you see where you made your error? And what of: Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) Opinion. Not making a factual assertion. Turns out his opinion was wrong, on top of it. He does seem to be, like you, a rightard however. So we can say he was "probably" wrong. We can say he was, in fact, since UBL was only recently killed. Allegedly, as we yet lack any verifiable physical evidence. No we don't. It is proven historical fact. Denial is not doubt, sweetums. But you will NEVER indict him as a "twoofer". Why would I? He isn't. He didn't claim UBL was dead. YOU claimed that he said that but now you admit he did not say that. His claim, sans a corpse, was that he was "probably dead". Which is an opinion and nothing more. you jeep stating this but it will never become a factual assertion. His claim was totally unambiguous. His opinion was not a claim. His look at available evidence led him to "opine" that UBL was "probably dead." That does not even come CLOSE to making the flat out assertion that UBL was dead at the time. So stop trying. BWAHAHAHHAHAAHAAA!!! You're begging for mercy when I now have you backtracking so deliciously? No quarter, dearie. Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' He was certainly entitled to his opinion. Note however that it turns out he was wrong. EPIC FAIL. Yours, yes. Nope, yours. Not in dispute. Sorry you made claims you can't prove, I proved them of course, and you just changed your claim and admitted you lied. Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) Uh, yeah. Holly ****. Griffin is like "Lord of the Kooks." Of course David Ray Griffin is a moron twoofer. He is a nutbag. Like you. sad it troubles you so much you can never admit it. I admit I kicked your ass as you now overtly admit. Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) See above. Griffin is Supreme Idiot among the twoofers. Nothing he has said is correct. The fact that we killed UBL last month sorta means you're an idiot and he was not dead before that. The "fact" changes nothing in hindsight. At each stage of his tape dissemination there have been credible governmental experts who claimed that the tapes we a. not him b. composites c. old recordings No there weren't. You really do like getting your ass kicked: I wouldn't know. It's never happened. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2526309.stm Researchers in Switzerland have questioned the authenticity of the recent audio recording attributed to Osama Bin Laden. Turns out they were wrong. A team from the Lausanne-based Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence, Idiap, said it was 95% certain the tape does not feature the voice of the al-Qaeda leader. Ooops for them! And thereby questioned if he was still alive. Thank you for ADMITTING once again that they did not CLAIM that he was dead, as you originally LIED. Probably dead = probably not alive = unambiguous. Correct, it's an unambiguous statement of OPINION, not fact. (You're making this too easy to kick your stupid kooker ass.) The people who did this were not "twoofers" they were defense analysts and that was there considered expert opinion at THOSE times. O-P-I-N-I-O-N EXPERT "opinion". An opinion coming from an expert does not convert it to a factual assertion, insane nut job. Suggest you have mommy explain to you the difference between stating an opinion and asserting a claim. (You're making this WAAAAAAY to easy for me!) You're spinning like a top now. Laughing at your stupid kooker ass. Nothing you can say here will rewrite history, Nor would I want to since history backs up my claims and contradicts yours, as you yourself just backtracked. Nope, credible experts made statement indicating he was dead, cope. Nope, they stated an opinion only, and turns out they were wrong. so just quit acting like a petulant child. I just kicked your whiny goal-post-shifting ass, moron. It was easy. You did what you always do when trapped, spin, obfuscate, lie and deny. Since I have never been "trapped," this is yet one more proof of your insanity. I won. ALl of my claims are clearly spelled out and proven fact. None of them can be refuted by your fabrications and lies. Whose payroll are you on anyway? "Payroll?" WTF? I am retired and a grandmother amusing myself by making sport of insane nut jobs like you. You provide more daily comedy gold than watching Maury. Kooks like you make it easy for people like me to get jollies out of insulting your stupid kooker asses. -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debrisoutward!
On 11-06-06 07:38 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
Opinion. Not making a factual assertion. Turns out his opinion was wrong, on top of it. Lacking a corpse EVERYONE's statements were "opinion", OBVIOUSLY. But we can unquestionably state that the following individuals were not "Moron twoofers" as you claimed: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ar-terror.html The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris...
Old country boy from Edwards,Missy Sippy, (he lives catty corner across
the street from doggy's couch) he done went to a store and he done bought a Coleman bug zapper thangy.Looks kind of like the shape of a Yapanee lantern.Most people don't realize all those electric bug zappers really do is ATTRACT MORE bugs. Yeah, old country boy, he once told me he knows all about chainsaws, he BROKE my chainsaw! He couldn't even find the oil drain plug on his lawn mower.He pushed his lawn mower (that one of his sons picked out for him at a pawn shop, $65.00 plus Missy Sippy RIP OFF sales taxes) over here, he rattled my front door, he said, SHOW ME WHERE THAT OIL DRAIN PLUG IS! Only took me about two seconds to wipe the crud off of there, that oil drain plug was RIGHT THERE.He was too STUPID to look for it. cuhulin |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris...
|
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 6, 10:00*am, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-06 07:38 AM,Iarnrodwrote: Opinion. Not making a factual assertion. Turns out his opinion was wrong, on top of it. Lacking a corpse EVERYONE's statements were "opinion", OBVIOUSLY. Not really. It didn't stop moron twoofers from making the factual claim that UBL was dead. Turns out they were wrong, didn't it. But we can unquestionably state that the following individuals were not "Moron twoofers" as you claimed: blink blink ? We can also state that you're an outright ****in' LIAR of course as I proved, since of course I made no such claim. I did NOT call people who simply had a hunch or opinion or feeling or belief that he might be dead. Seems you're STILL hopped up on sniffing glue to bother learning the DIFF between fact and opinion. Griffin, he IS a nutbag. That much I'll give ya!! So are you! Sux to be you, I guess. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) -- |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
"corneal pye" wrote in message ... On 11-06-06 10:15 PM, Iarnrod wrote: He said "probably dead", Aha!! So once aganin you are swinging back to my side and ADMITTING that he DID NOT CLAIM UBL was dead byut only proposed a guess, a speculation, an OPINION. Of the two choices, DEAD or ALIVE... Sorry, false dichotomy. Which one did he make? Neither. Again: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. Probably dead isn't the same as a statement he IS dead. Please try to distinguish between opinion, possibilities, and statements of known fact. He didn't say Osama was dead. He didn't claim to know Osama was dead. He simply expressed his opinion that he was assuming that Osama was probably dead. What part of "probably" do you think doesn't allow the possibility that Osama is or rather was, in fact, alive? All you're doing is making yourself look stupid. Probably is NOT conclusive. Probably is NOT a statement that he knows positively the status. Your attempt to make it into more than it is simply illustrates your desire to bend, twist, distort, deny and ignore what actually was said in favor of your own personal agenda and views. In short, the only person making the assertion he WAS dead...is you, and you're clearly wrong. |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris...
Animal knocks WLBT off the air.
http://www.clarionledger.com What it was, a Goose flew into a transformer.WLBT 3, the tee vee station that doesn't exist. cuhulin |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 6, 9:35*pm, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-06 10:02 PM,Iarnrodwrote: On Jun 6, 10:00 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied- Address.invalid *wrote: On 11-06-06 07:38 AM,Iarnrodwrote: *Opinion. Not making a factual assertion. Turns out his opinion was wrong, on top of it. Lacking a corpse EVERYONE's statements were "opinion", OBVIOUSLY. Not really. Yes, really, obviously, sans evidencely! Nope. Sorry but speculation is not the equivalent of proven FACT. You're a moron if you "think" they are. It didn't stop moron twoofers Who cares? Morons always make claims. As you prove through your own behavior! But we can unquestionably state that the following individuals were not "Moron twoofers" as you claimed: blink blink ? We can also state that you're an outright ****in' LIAR Nope, Yep. It is beyond question that you are a liar. This has been proven. These are the facts, YOU are in denial. No, dearie, you are the one claiming that opinion is fact. chuckle |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 6, 9:39*pm, corneal pye c...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote: On 11-06-06 10:15 PM,Iarnrodwrote: He said "probably dead", Aha!! So once aganin you are swinging back to my side and ADMITTING that he DID NOT CLAIM UBL was dead byut only proposed a guess, a speculation, an OPINION. Of the two choices, DEAD or ALIVE... Which one did he make? BWAHAAHAAHAAAA!!! Moron Pie-in-the-face "thinks" an opinion becomes a fact if there are two choices!! TOO ****IN' FUNNY!! You are reaching new heights of komedy gold today, fuzznuts!! Congrats! That one got a laugh out of me! Again: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK Bin Laden 'probably' dead Sure sounds like opinion rather than factual assertion! The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism chief, Dale Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead. (Moron twoofer?) Why would he be, moron? He is merely expressing an opinion, not making a factual assertion. Good thing since it turned out he was wrong. Suggest you learn the diff. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d... The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator magazine earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer and senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the evidence suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin Laden.' (Moron twoofer?) For expressing an opinion rather than making a factual assertion? Why would you think that? Are you stupid? Oh wait, yes you are! Turned out he was wrong! There are other doubters, too. "DOUBTERS." Learn the diff, kook. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin Laden expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the video and audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with references to God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict Islamic religion, Wahhabism. (Moron twoofer?) This week, still more questions have been raised with the publication in America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont School of Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far more detail about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up by the West. The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a linked complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's Tora Bora mountains close to the border with Waziristan. His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim religious rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom. (Moron twoofer?) Griffin? Moron Twoofer? Yes, he is King of the Idiots. Do you have anything at all new? No? Please, you must keep amusing me. Step it up, would ya? |
WETBACKS fill new Fountain with their poop!
New $11 million dollars Whale's Tail Fountain in New London (Gitcha
Phony Fraud Fake Ass SS Cards Right Here Connecticut) shut down. http://www.drudgereport.com Even Birds have Sense enough not to poop in the Bird Baths and Fountains. cuhulin |
WETBACKS fill new Fountain with their poop!
On 6/7/2011 2:37 PM, wrote:
New $11 million dollars Whale's Tail Fountain in New London (Gitcha Phony Fraud Fake Ass SS Cards Right Here Connecticut) shut down. http://www.drudgereport.com Even Birds have Sense enough not to poop in the Bird Baths and Fountains. cuhulin You'd think for that reason alone, they would not be allowing the influx of criminal illegal aliens into America -- it is the equivalent of taking a dump on the plate you eat from! -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
WETBACKS fill new Fountain with their poop!
Three or four something years ago I saw an article at Drudge Report
about raw sewage running down a street in New York City, it was coming from an hispanic neighborhood, according to the article. cuhulin |
WETBACKS fill new Fountain with their poop!
|
WETBACKS fill new Fountain with their poop!
On 6/7/2011 10:22 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:
... You do realize that the great majority of hispanics in the Big Apple are Puerto Ricans, and are US citizens? Also, if there was raw sewage above ground in NYC, it was a problem with the city's upkeep of the sewer system, doesn't matter what neighborhood it was. Sounds about right, for the government. Legal immigration is even of numbers which our economy can't handle over a long term, the illegal immigration only hastens our fall to 3rd world status ... I think the illegal alien problem with puerto ricans, or even cubans, is a very large problem also ... most Americans are just focused, mainly, on the wetbacks (no. American indians of mexico and so. American indians of so. America) ... few realize the true extent and dangers of this problem, and the fact in is composed of even more race/ethnic groups. I realize that ghettos and slums frequently have the problem(s) mentioned, more so than the areas which public servants live in, anyway .... and, of such a nature, I don't want to live in those areas! I am watching an area of my own city become a ghetto as I write this, a once fine area ... I was forced to move from an ancient area where I lived in a home which belonged to my great grandparents and has been passed down in the family (I have been forced to the out-skirts of the city where it is safer.) My Great Grandparents Home now has bars and grates on doors, windows and a state of the art burglar alarm, sprinklers come on during the night to discourage "campers" from the grounds ... you just can't hide those ugly features. We are lucky to go two weeks without having to remove graffiti from the sound wall, fences or even the house itself, which the burglar alarm is supposed to stop .... sad, so very, very sad ... the police dept has began sending us bills for automatic calls made to the police and they are forced to respond. This was the dream home me and the wife were to retire to! Obviously, the city would love for us to turn off the alarm, let it be vandalized and torn apart, trashed. Then, and rather quickly, they would slap a nuisance claim on it and own it! Do you know what it would cost me for a private security firm to protect it? My government seeks to victimize my family along with the criminals -- indeed, we are at the point where the actual differences between the two seem slight, and of little importance to us. All this, and there is even a care-taking couple living in the guest house, who run off people hopping fences almost nightly, and there is UGLY razor wire atop the fences (they leap the states sound wall which we can't put razor wire on!) They are just poor illegals who want to toss some bedding in an unused corner of the property, seek emergency shelter by just breaking one window and sleeping the night, trashing the house, just employ a poor working girl for the night, and drink some alcohol, smoke some crack, or use a bit of heroine, etc. ... poor b*st*rds! Your defense of "the poor immigrants" is real heart touching, to you. To someone who suffers the victimizations of this massive problem, it is sheer hell ... I hope you live to see the day when these problems come to visit you, and you can finally have sympathy ... It takes at least two generation (and that time period) living on American soil to escape the "3rd world thinking" that led them into the conditions you see these people in ... if we stop it now, it will still not improve for a couple/three generations ... -- Regards, JS “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the government.” -- Patrick Henry |
9/11 debris fills basement levels and is forced to flow debris outward!
On Jun 3, 12:06*pm, BDK wrote:
In article 0c4321a8-2248-4678-ad79-0fc41c1cc6e7 @m40g2000vbt.googlegroups.com, says... On Jun 1, 9:15*am, Iarnrod wrote: On May 31, 9:23*pm, joeturn wrote: On May 31, 7:06*pm, RHF wrote: On May 31, 10:53*am, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote : On May 23, 7:46*pm, RD Sandman wrote: joeturn wrote innews:56dbdfd0-9478-4ffd-8f98-20a3 : On May 23, 3:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: John Smith wrote : On 5/22/2011 2:16 PM, joeturn wrote: On May 22, 4:47 pm, *wrote: On May 21, 4:37 pm, "Scout" *wrote: *wrote in message ups .c om... On May 20, 11:53 pm, *wrote: On May 20, 8:53 pm, "Scout" *wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 4:44 PM, Scout wrote: "John *wrote in message ... On 5/20/2011 3:34 PM, Scout wrote: ... Evasion noted. Your inability to explain why we should accept your claims over photographic evidence is noted. Your denial of photographic evidence is noted. Seems all you can do is lie about the facts that don't match your claims. There is no evading your ignorance, it will remain until you deal with it ... Nice to hear you admit you have a problem with ignorance and that you need to do something about it, but really you shouldn't be talking to yourself in public, makes people question your sanity even further. You simply need avail yourself of the experts. *All I do is repeat the facts, evidence and proof of the experts. So let's see, by your own admission you are a parrot that is so ignorant that he can't look at a photo of a building in the process of falling outside of it's footprint and still can't determine his experts might not be the experts they claim and that you're stupid enough to buy their Bull**** hook, line and sinker. Ok, I accept you don't know what you're talking about by your own admission. Which means you're really not the right person to be trying to talk about this stuff then are you? Maybe you should tell your experts to come here since maybe they might actually know what they're talking about rather than simply mouthing the claims of others that they don't understand, can't support, and can't even recognize as being clearly wrong? So now that we've established you as an ignorant mouthpiece by your own admission, is there any further reason anyone should listen to you for even a second? I think your post is more about you than me, why don't you ask others if they can see you for the worthless attack slob you are, or they are fooled into thinking you are offering valid debate, analysis, facts, etc.? IOW, you can't refute anything I have said about you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Scot is completely ignoring the missile attack on the pentagram. What missile attack, insane nut job? Oh, that comes from the nutjob who posted his "expert" analysis of the frames from the Pentagon surveillance video showing the plane crashing into the side of the Pentagon. Of course, what both this "expert" and joe failed to even consider is that even on the video the SCALE of the image would clearly preclude a missile given that it's at least 2 stories in height as compared to the 5 stories of the Pentagon. But the voice over from the "expert" says it was a missile, and that's good enough "proof" for Joe. Which way did it fall Scot after the missiles hit it? When did missiles hit it? I wasn't even aware the Pentagon fell over. Three missiles are were recorded in the same FBI release, Show us, insnae nut job. Yea, one "missile" per frame.snicker Well the remnates of the first one is just the solid rocket fuel plume after the hit,but you can see the next two in motion! Stop sniffing glue, WrongTurnJoe. "It is too late for that" Chun in Remo Williams.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - But your plane still wont fit in that little red box it will only contain an object no larger than 16 feet! Everyone can see the missile in front of the solid rocket plume!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - PS I did not pay any attention to what the guy in the middle link says I just saw the missile on my own look at it before the red box is drawn! Then in the top link you can see it over and over again,There is no plane just a missile launched from withing the fenced in constrution area. What kind of military vehicle is that at mark 7:03 in the video below a flatbed firetruck? I recall seeing it parked beside the construction gererater dont you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjcoP...=player_embedd ed There is some reason the tape of what actually happened at the pentacon has NOT been released, even yet, today ... Yes, it has. *There are videos, tours of the damage, stories from th e survivors......what else do you want? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I too am a survivor of 911 I was not there at the time like most government paid stooges.But I can tell you the cartoon they put on for the TV audience was nothing like realy being there! The area was roped off and most of the props were put into the staged area before the hologramed air craft *was projected! They even put the JT8MD engine on the sidewalk and covered it up with a tarp so it would go unnoticed till after the hologram! Wow!! *Now I know where those berries disappeared to. Did you have them with milk or simply eat them raw? -- Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman) If you woke up this morning.... Don't complain.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - They were not berrys RD they were coffee beans.They ground them up in the cat **** soo they could charge you more for them. You gulped them down with every sip and I'll bet you smilled and said eye instead of saying this taste and smells exactly like cat ****! You taste for **** is appaling,but to each his own! - My taste for **** is so acute, I even post to you. *;) - ... read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Have you had it sexed yet? When is it due? You could have been the mother of a genius but you out smarted yourself! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com