On Jun 1, 12:59*am, John Smith wrote:
On 5/31/2011 11:59 PM, Mike Painter wrote:









John Smith wrote:
On 5/31/2011 9:42 PM, Olrik wrote:

...
Huh?
...

Yeah, the particularly dense have a problem here, let me rephrase:

"Nothing can't hold something."

The logic of that statement is self-explanatory. *You can "put"
something into nothing because there would be no "space" to "put" it
into!
Indeed, if you "succeed" in putting something into nothing -- it would
cease to exist! *DUH!, there would be "nothing" to hold the
"something!"
Which ignores the "truely empty box" part of your comment.

As for "aether". I suspect you are confusing it with "ether" and you should
stop smelling it.

I can give you a true example of "nothing."

You have a small box, the inside dimension of 1x1x1 inches. *Into this
box, you place a 1x1x1 inch O.D. cube.

Now you have an example of "nothing." *As, there is "nothing" between
the outside of the cube and the inside of the box -- and, you don't have
any possibility of movement of the cube within the box!

And, the reason is simple, you can't move "something" into "nothing!"

This is what "nothing" is.

Regards,
JS

A lot of very square brains are stuffed into square skulls of the
exact same volume here in Google Groups or Usenet/newsgroups, thus
you've nailed the problem. They've managed to put to much of
something into nothing, or vise versa.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On 6/1/2011 3:34 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
A lot of very square brains are stuffed into square skulls of the
exact same volume here in Google Groups or Usenet/newsgroups, thus
you've nailed the problem. They've managed to put to much of
something into nothing, or vise versa.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”


Again, I was commenting on "empty", "space", "nothing", "matter", etc.

Your need to now branch off on, yet, another tangent of what appears is
going to now center on personal attacks, due you your ego suffering
imagined damages, simply takes the context of the matters out of the
discussion, and now leaves another discussion in their place.

Interesting, but like I said, I simply have no comments of any
importance to make on subjects which I have no interest in.

Perhaps such NGs as alt.support.self-esteem, alt.self-improve,
alt.support.self-harm or even alt.recovery.panic-anxiety.self-help would
be much more fitting forums/platforms to your directions?

For your easy diversion into subjects, other than the ones under
immediate discussion, perhaps you could consider starting a newsgroup
such as "alt.support.maintaining-focus?"

Regards,
JS

On Jun 1, 3:52*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 3:34 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
A lot of very square brains are stuffed into square skulls of the
exact same volume here in Google Groups or Usenet/newsgroups, thus
you've nailed the problem. *They've managed to put to much of
something into nothing, or vise versa.

*http://www.wanttoknow.info/
*http://translate.google.com/#
* Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

Again, I was commenting on "empty", "space", "nothing", "matter", etc.

Your need to now branch off on, yet, another tangent of what appears is
going to now center on personal attacks, due you your ego suffering
imagined damages, simply takes the context of the matters out of the
discussion, and now leaves another discussion in their place.

Interesting, but like I said, I simply have no comments of any
importance to make on subjects which I have no interest in.

Perhaps such NGs as alt.support.self-esteem, alt.self-improve,
alt.support.self-harm or even alt.recovery.panic-anxiety.self-help would
be much more fitting forums/platforms to your directions?

For your easy diversion into subjects, other than the ones under
immediate discussion, perhaps you could consider starting a newsgroup
such as "alt.support.maintaining-focus?"

Regards,
JS

You need to make something really big out of nothing is noted.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On 6/1/2011 8:48 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You need to make something really big out of nothing is noted.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

That is your problem, you dismiss the really basic and necessary rules
and laws of science and jump, then, to subjects you are unable to
discuss in a logical and reasoning manner.

Since this now allows you to rant on subjects you know nothing about,
you can make insane guesses, hold insane beliefs, and propose impossible
situations which obey none of the real laws of science and math ... and,
doing all with no sense of how insane it sounds to those who have a
knowledge of all this. Since you don't know any better, you think none
do -- gee, akin to winos giving PhD dissertations on complex matters of
importance!

But hey, if it works for you ... ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

On Jun 1, 10:22*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 8:48 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You need to make something really big out of nothing is noted.

*http://www.wanttoknow.info/
*http://translate.google.com/#
* Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

That is your problem, you dismiss the really basic and necessary rules
and laws of science and jump, then, to subjects you are unable to
discuss in a logical and reasoning manner.

Since this now allows you to rant on subjects you know nothing about,
you can make insane guesses, hold insane beliefs, and propose impossible
situations which obey none of the real laws of science and math ... and,
doing all with no sense of how insane it sounds to those who have a
knowledge of all this. *Since you don't know any better, you think none
do -- gee, akin to winos giving PhD dissertations on complex matters of
importance!

But hey, if it works for you ... *ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

There's nothing sane about Google Groups or much less Usenet/
newsgroups that are 99.9% populated with rusemasters or FUD-masters of
the mainstream status quo.

At times you need a really good battery of loose cannons in order to
return the favor, along with a good sense of humor and sadistic
zingers that'll help define those trying to make your existence as
insignificant or nonexistent as possible.

Giving a topic or one of its replies a reasonable swag is fair game.
Otherwise I like to stick within the regular laws of physics and
interpret from the best available science, whereas others here seem to
prefer to topic/author stalk and to use those highly social/political
and even faith-based conditional laws of physics, plus they usually
exclude/banish or obfuscate on behalf of any science that doesn't
happen to agree with their closed mindset that is usually based upon
worshiping all things Einstein.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

You have a hole in the ground.Inside the hole is air, around the hole
and below the hole is more ground.All you are 'digging' is air.You have
to move that shovel to where there is some ground if you want to dig
something.
Colder than a well digger's arse in Montana!
cuhulin

On 6/1/2011 3:44 PM, wrote:
You have a hole in the ground.Inside the hole is air, around the hole
and below the hole is more ground.All you are 'digging' is air.You have
to move that shovel to where there is some ground if you want to dig
something.
Colder than a well digger's arse in Montana!
cuhulin


Glad to finally see some relevant remarks, in a post, finally inserted
into the discussion!

ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

On 6/1/2011 3:44 PM, wrote:

...
Colder than a well digger's arse in Montana!
cuhulin


Or, colder than a witches' tit in January! (and, allowing for her to be
riding a broom at the time the comment is expected to be accurate!)

Regards,
JS

New York City (watch out NYC, somebody is going around in Brooklyn and
stealing them thar Iron Fences) and San Diego overdue for Hurricanes, so
says an article at,
http://www.standeyo.com
cuhulin

Watchin the weather channel furr ah leetle wyle.It is a 'weather maker'
day today/tonight.From Coast to Coast and in between.Two tornados hit
Springfield,Massatwobumps twice in two hours.
cuhulin