|
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? So then he didn't acknowledge that the "gravitational ether" existed? He didn't acknowledge that space is bent like a mattress by a bowling ball, and subject to the forces of gravity? You are claiming lines of space (ether) penetrate through the earth as perfectly straight lines? Let's see the sources which cause you to reach that/those conclusion(s?) Regards, JS |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
On 6/2/11 11:34 , John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? So then he didn't acknowledge that the "gravitational ether" existed? He didn't acknowledge that space is bent like a mattress by a bowling ball, and subject to the forces of gravity? You are claiming lines of space (ether) penetrate through the earth as perfectly straight lines? Let's see the sources which cause you to reach that/those conclusion(s?) Regards, JS Wow. Two words and you misread it. I stand in awe. Einstein was quite clear that space was a non-Euclidian construct. That, in fact, it was quite flexible, and that there were no straight lines. And that it was finite. |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 2, 9:34*am, John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? So then he didn't acknowledge that the "gravitational ether" existed? He didn't acknowledge that space is bent like a mattress by a bowling ball, and subject to the forces of gravity? You are claiming lines of space (ether) penetrate through the earth as perfectly straight lines? Let's see the sources which cause you to reach that/those conclusion(s?) Regards, JS Obviously lensing proves the flexibility of space and perhaps even that of time which at least photons seem to respect, thereby establishing that it's by no means empty unless 1000 atomic particles plus whatever flow of gravity and magnetic fields per cubic meter is supposed to represent emptiness. If space were truly empty, photons could ether travel FTL and thereby become invisible to our best instruments, or perhaps not manage to go anywhere. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:34:10 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by John Smith : On 6/2/2011 9:25 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote: Space does not bend. Einstein disagreed. Really? Yes, really; Einstein showed that space bends, and therefore disagreed with the statement that "Space does not bend". snip -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 2, 8:33*am, John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 7:22 AM, Warhol wrote: ... and in space there ain't no ether found... there is only the infinite void... Space does not bend. A ray/ a Beam does. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0109/3c175_vla.jpg ... Actually, the only way you can bend a light beam (or, any other electromagnetic beam or photons) is to bend the material which contains the beam. But, if you said something correct now, you would ruin your record of being 100% wrong -- good save! ROFLOL Regards, JS Once in a while our cranky doom and gloom Warhol gets it right. http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 2, 7:22*am, Warhol wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:48*am, John Smith wrote: On 6/2/2011 12:29 AM, Warhol wrote: ... since a few NASA employees post here maybe they have something to sat about this? Also the opposite of what NASA says *is the truth... They will have egg on their faces again. No one wishes to stick their neck out and call it "ether" (or aether) for that matter ... even Einstein attempts to acknowledge "it" as the "cosmological effect" (basically, but denied by many, to be equiv. to a "cosmic ether.") I find many high schools and colleges are even "unaware" (or in some form of denial) to Einsteins admission of a "gravitational ether." Like I say, there is relatively "handful" of people who come right out and deal with ether as a substantial material, in academic and research branches. An example of what I am referring to is this abstract: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PhLA..152..458A Or, this one: http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608164 Investigating with search terms composed of "gravitational ether", "cosmic ether", "cosmological effect", etc. will show the debate is far from over ... However, the "effect" which seems to go wanting for a proper name has already been covered under the name of "ether." *However, since many have denied its' existence, but now are forced to admit "something is there", attempt to hide their mistaken denial in a "name change ploy/tactic." *This has more to do with human nature and the refusal to admit mistakes than anything else ... Actually, quite funny to watch! *Very smart people also suffer from such ego worship ... and the fear of being ostracized by their peers ... Simply put, you can still deny the "ether" if you just name "it" something else, since then, you deny the "it" is ether! *ROFLOL Regards, JS I wont talk anymore about this, since ether is known to be air... just consult the ancient encyclopedia's. and in space there ain't no ether found... there is only the infinite void... Space does not bend. A ray/ a Beam does. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0109/3c175_vla.jpg And what is an atomic clock? what a joke... science filled with untrue claims. THE GREAT ATOMIC CLOCK SCAM! Like false religion, if they contradict each other each time. Maybe I should start a thread; "FAKE of CENTURY" BTW E = mc2 is not Einstein's equation at all... The big E just made "h" (plancks constant usable)... no such thing as dark energy/mass no anti gravity no black holes Space don't bend by gravity No Cosmic Ether if you have specifics perhaps ask Yids deliberately associated his name with it though for the usual reasons of deception and promoting the meme that the self chosen are superior intellects... the *******s who think they know, have no p.h.u.c.k.ing clue... PSS Ether, or luminiferous Ether, was the hypothetical substance through which electromagnetic waves travel. It was proposed by the greek philosopher Aristotle Eric Weisstein's World of Biography and used by several optical theories as a way to allow propagation of light, which was believed to be impossible in "empty" space. http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Ether.html So it was and they changed the laws by fraud and made all students very dumb... the ancient knew what we don't know anymore. Space is not empty, unless 1000 atomic particles per m3 qualifies, plus scads of energy and force always passing through each and every m3. I'm not sure the innards of a black hole are empty, but there is that remote possibility of that robust sphere of positrons being hollow and thus having nothing at its core. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 2, 5:33*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 7:22 AM, Warhol wrote: ... and in space there ain't no ether found... there is only the infinite void... Space does not bend. A ray/ a Beam does. http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0109/3c175_vla.jpg ... Actually, the only way you can bend a light beam (or, any other electromagnetic beam or photons) is to bend the material which contains the beam. But, if you said something correct now, you would ruin your record of being 100% wrong -- good save! ROFLOL Regards, JS our ancient TV Tubes work with a bended electrical arc Beam in vacuum... http://www.physicscentral.com/elemen...s/beam-img.jpg http://www.edsavhandbook.com/CRT%20Ilustrationn.jpg modulating electron beams navigate from left to right, top to bottom, and illuminate the red, green, and blue sets of phosphor located behind a fine wire mesh screen, the shadow mask, near the screen’s surface. Thus the original video image is recreated. So here we have the proof rays/beams can be bended... The cathode ray tube is the technology that launched TV and dominated video displays in the 20th century. Its key component parts consist of the cathode, the anode, two electromagnets, a steering circuit. |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
Get a sheet of paper and fold it into pleats, as though you are making a
fan to wave back and forth to cool yourself.Some people say/hypothesize Space/or a part of Space, the distance could be shortened similar to a sheet of pleated paper so as to shorten the distance when traveling from place to place in Space in Spaceships. cuhulin |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com