|
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
On Jul 8, 4:46*am, "Scout"
wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct? No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record. Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original? Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is closed, fuzznuts. Why is it there is a serious question about the registration number that shows up on the document Obama has produced? There is no such question. Seems to me given the irregularities that further investigation is warranted if only due to his security clearances. Seems to me you're full of **** as usual. Your denial does not create a real doubt about the document, but about your sanity, Certainly such would occur with anyone else obtaining or holding a TS clearance should such irregularities arise. No, it would do no such thing. The state certification would be accepted. So why is he "special"? He is "special" in the historical sense that he made history by being the first and only presidential candidate in US history ever to actually document through his birth certificate that he meets the natural born citizen requirement. Case closed. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
"Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct? No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record. Yep, no one has validated Obama's, indeed there are reports they can't even find it. So how you do validate a copy when you can't find the original? Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original? Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is closed, fuzznuts. Then you will have no problems producing a cite of it. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
On Jul 8, 7:18*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message .... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct? No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record. Yep, no one has validated Obama's, Hawaii has. indeed there are reports they can't even find it. No, there are in fact so such reports, stoopid. You're just lying. Making **** up doesn't constitute what we smart people like to call "evidence," dope. So how you do validate a copy when you can't find the original? False premise. DISMISSED. The original in fact is now public, Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original? Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is closed, fuzznuts. Then you will have no problems producing a cite of it. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
On Jul 10, 7:15*am, Iarnrod wrote:
Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. You know how it is with racists like him. Anything claimed by his fellow racist nutters is seized upon as fact by him and propagated in spite of it being wrong and proven so. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
"Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian government? Obama gave it out at a press conference. Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii? It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it there is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some questionable issues concerning it. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
On 7/10/2011 12:04 AM, george wrote:
Well Donald Trump changed his claim about the birth certificate declaring that his questioning made Obama get his birth certificate released to the media. And guess what, Obama was born a US citizen.... Speaking of Trump (the Republican's answer to Bozo the Clown)*, whatever happened to the 'bombshell' Trump was going to drop about the startling information his hired detectives "discovered"? Sort of interesting as to how that conveniently died on the vine. * At least Bozo is honest about admitting he is a clown, more than you can say about Trump. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
On 7/9/2011 11:45 PM, Scout wrote:
Actually there are a number of things, like: 1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was registered several days after Obama's? 2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than showing the security document features as it should? 3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not line up with the other pixels? There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't have a valid answer for. None of the other birthtard kookers here have been able to answer this, so let me give you a shot at providing a valid answer... Why hasn't the R-E-P-U-B-L-I-C-A-N, C-O-N-S-E-R-V-A-T-I-V-E, anti-Obama Wall Street Journal, with its fleet of investigative reporters and deep pockets not found anything like you mention above, hmmm? Why does the Wall Street Journal say Obama *IS* a legitimate US citizen??? Maybe you could make a few bucks selling your phony "facts" above to the WSJ. On second thought, they probably aren't as gullible as the birthtards. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
On Jul 9, 9:45*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 4:10 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message .... On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian government? Hey stoopid, didn't you CHECK it out? snicker Widdle Cub Scout is afwaid. He's bit off more than he can chew here and is running away! Obama gave it out at a press conference. Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii? BWAHAAAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! Keep tap dancing, kook!! LUV IT!!! It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it there is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some questionable issues concerning it. There is not one single questionable thing about Obama's birth certificate. Actually there are a number of things, like: 1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was registered several days after Obama's? Cite. Not questionable. It's Hawaii's system, the state have authenticated it. Case is closed. 2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than showing the security document features as it should? False premise. Lack of cite to support your claims is duly noted. There is nothing about the scan that is questionable to anyone who knows anything about pdf files. 3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not line up with the other pixels? Lack of cite noted. Lack of cite that anything of the sort would be questionable is also noted. Your stupidity is noted. There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't have a valid answer for. You have not yet raised a valid and supportable question. DISMISSED. Hint: Bone up on pdfs, kooker. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
"Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 9:45 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 4:10 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian government? Hey stoopid, didn't you CHECK it out? snicker Widdle Cub Scout is afwaid. He's bit off more than he can chew here and is running away! Obama gave it out at a press conference. Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii? BWAHAAAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! Keep tap dancing, kook!! LUV IT!!! It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it there is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some questionable issues concerning it. There is not one single questionable thing about Obama's birth certificate. Actually there are a number of things, like: 1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was registered several days after Obama's? Cite. http://www.sodahead.com/united-state...estion-525043/ Not questionable. It's Hawaii's system, the state have authenticated it. Case is closed. Which does not address the issues, or proves anything since independent verification can not be obtained. 2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than showing the security document features as it should? False premise. Lack of cite to support your claims is duly noted. http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...anomalies/1784 There is nothing about the scan that is questionable to anyone who knows anything about pdf files. So it is your contention that in a scan of a document the PDF software would put a white halo around the lettering and remove the security document features? Cite. 3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not line up with the other pixels? Lack of cite noted. Lack of cite that anything of the sort would be questionable is also noted. Your stupidity is noted. http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...anomalies/1784 There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't have a valid answer for. You have not yet raised a valid and supportable question. DISMISSED. Hint: Bone up on pdfs, kooker. Cites provided, and I await your counter cites showing that pdf files act in this manner. |
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post.
On Jul 10, 9:41*am, "Scout"
wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 9, 9:45 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message .... On Jul 9, 4:10 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian government? Hey stoopid, didn't you CHECK it out? snicker Widdle Cub Scout is afwaid. He's bit off more than he can chew here and is running away! Obama gave it out at a press conference. Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii? BWAHAAAHAHAAHAHAAA!!! Keep tap dancing, kook!! LUV IT!!! It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it there is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some questionable issues concerning it. There is not one single questionable thing about Obama's birth certificate. Actually there are a number of things, like: 1) Why does his registration number come after someone who's birth was registered several days after Obama's? Cite. http://www.sodahead.com/united-state...crepancy-in-ob... Not questionable. It's Hawaii's system, the state have authenticated it. Case is closed. Which does not address the issues, or proves anything since independent verification can not be obtained. What is the issue? You have yet to establish that there is an issue here. Your mystification over Hawaii's numbering system does not create a crisis for actual people with actual brains, kook. 2) Why does his scan have a white halo around the lettering rather than showing the security document features as it should? False premise. Lack of cite to support your claims is duly noted. http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...rtificate-pixe... DISMISSED. Failure to state a claim. Your claim is not established. There is nothing about the scan that is questionable to anyone who knows anything about pdf files. So it is your contention that in a scan of a document the PDF software would put a white halo around the lettering and remove the security document features? Cite. Cite what? YOU are the one who needs to cite, You cannot. 3) Why are the pixel sizes irregular, and why do some of those pixels not line up with the other pixels? Lack of cite noted. Lack of cite that anything of the sort would be questionable is also noted. Your stupidity is noted. http://www.decodedscience.com/presid...rtificate-pixe... DISMISSED. Ignorance of simple PDF methods doesn't create an actual issue for people with actual brains. There, 3 questionable things about his BC, and ones which I bet you don't have a valid answer for. You have not yet raised a valid and supportable question. DISMISSED. Hint: Bone up on pdfs, kooker. Cites provided, All irrelevant to your stated claims. You have yet to show that any of this is unusual. and I await your counter cites showing that pdf files act in this manner. I await your cites to support your ludicrous brainless and ignorant claims. Hint: We both know you will fail since the birth certificate is of course the real McCoy as Hawaii has certified. Case is closed, moran. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com