Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 4:46*am, "Scout"
wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct? No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record. Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original? Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is closed, fuzznuts. Why is it there is a serious question about the registration number that shows up on the document Obama has produced? There is no such question. Seems to me given the irregularities that further investigation is warranted if only due to his security clearances. Seems to me you're full of **** as usual. Your denial does not create a real doubt about the document, but about your sanity, Certainly such would occur with anyone else obtaining or holding a TS clearance should such irregularities arise. No, it would do no such thing. The state certification would be accepted. So why is he "special"? He is "special" in the historical sense that he made history by being the first and only presidential candidate in US history ever to actually document through his birth certificate that he meets the natural born citizen requirement. Case closed. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct? No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record. Yep, no one has validated Obama's, indeed there are reports they can't even find it. So how you do validate a copy when you can't find the original? Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original? Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is closed, fuzznuts. Then you will have no problems producing a cite of it. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 7:18*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message .... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct? No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record. Yep, no one has validated Obama's, Hawaii has. indeed there are reports they can't even find it. No, there are in fact so such reports, stoopid. You're just lying. Making **** up doesn't constitute what we smart people like to call "evidence," dope. So how you do validate a copy when you can't find the original? False premise. DISMISSED. The original in fact is now public, Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original? Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is closed, fuzznuts. Then you will have no problems producing a cite of it. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 10, 7:15*am, Iarnrod wrote:
Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Obama gave it out at a press conference. It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. You know how it is with racists like him. Anything claimed by his fellow racist nutters is seized upon as fact by him and propagated in spite of it being wrong and proven so. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 7:18 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 8, 4:46 am, "Scout" wrote: "Iarnrod" wrote in message ... On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote: usual delusional racist blather Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT. Case closed. That's an interesting position. And a correct and dispositive one. I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the computer on fraudulent data. Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record filed in 1961. Cite. Hey stoopid, check the White House web site. Really? The White House web site is controlled by the Hawaiian government? Obama gave it out at a press conference. Oh, so now Obama is Hawaii? It made all the papers. The case is closed. Are you sniffing glue again? Holy COW but you're stupid. I accept you can't back up your BS, and since they haven't released it there is no verification for what Obama has produced which has some questionable issues concerning it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post. | Shortwave | |||
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent Johnny KQQK post. | Shortwave | |||
Excellent analysis/examination of fraudulent birth certificate. | Shortwave | |||
A question about amateur license examination in the US | CB | |||
?? QRZ ?? passed re-examination? | Shortwave |