On 7/28/2011 1:10 PM, dave wrote:
On 7/28/2011 8:30 AM, MNMikew wrote:
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's
atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than
alarmist
computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed
science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future
global
warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted,
and
supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide
trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...192334971.html



Fake. Not reported elsewhere. You got punk'd.

Once again, special dave goes for the idiot of the day award, AND GETS
IT, for the 1,235,231,123 time (he has made the same number of posts!
Another Guinness record, in its' own right.)

http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.co...braswell-2011/

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/NAS...7/28/id/405200

Once again, making a statement by example, or, don't do something which
will make you look like a fool!

Instead, do something to prove beyond doubt that you are one!

Congratulations dave, you deserve it ... :-)

Regards,
JS

On Jul 28, 1:29*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 7/28/2011 1:10 PM, dave wrote:





On 7/28/2011 8:30 AM, MNMikew wrote:
NASA satellite data from the years 2000 through 2011 show the Earth's
atmosphere is allowing far more heat to be released into space than
alarmist
computer models have predicted, reports a new study in the peer-reviewed
science journal Remote Sensing. The study indicates far less future
global
warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted,
and
supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide
trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.

http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-data-blow...-warming-alarm....

Fake. Not reported elsewhere. You got punk'd.

Once again, special dave goes for the idiot of the day award, AND GETS
IT, for the 1,235,231,123 time (he has made the same number of posts!
Another Guinness record, in its' own right.)

http://pielkeclimatesci.wordpress.co...per-on-the-mis...

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/NAS...armists/2011/0...

Once again, making a statement by example, or, don't do something which
will make you look like a fool!

Instead, do something to prove beyond doubt that you are one!

Congratulations dave, you deserve it ... *:-)

Regards,
JS- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That "study" not only has Forbes inaccurately written all over it - it
not only is PACKED full of code words and buzzwords designed to make
conservative oil lackies foam at the mouth like rabid muskrats in heat
- it not only would instantaneously overturn 150 years' worth of hard
data and peer-reviewed science - but it has NEVER been peer reviewed
and has not yet passed any kind of muster with other scientists. If it
is true (believe me, nobody wishes it were true more than me), the
truth wil reveal itself as it is tested repeatedly and examined
throughly over the next couple of years by REAL scientists and not
highly biased "journalists" and fools. We'll see.