Am 06.10.2011 08:52, schrieb Scout:

...
Crimes are usually not unavoidable like bad weather. It is a sign of a
degenerated society, that people believe, they could only survive, if
they run around with arms.

Hmmmm....meanwhile the UK has one of the highest violent crime rates
among the leading nations.


I have a lot of friends from England and they all tell me the same
story. They came to Germany, because the situation in the UK is too
tough. It is a very lawless and violent society.
UK is also extremely militaristic and outruns even the USA.

How did that happen?

Well, I don't know. Maybe this is a build in feature of the English
society. Also the UK is highly influenced by masons and other societies,
with questionable objectives.

And we see how well that society worked as London burned this summer.


The destruction of the English society is something, that really worries
me. Its closer than the USA, but more severe.
Germany is different.

Greece has a lot of problems now and there are other countries with
large deficits.

So clearly trying to keep people from having arms, doesn't necessarily
mean crimes won't occur.


I don't like the English way to control the people beyond every possible
means.

Actually that wasn't my point. If you think, you need a weapon to defend
yourself, than maybe thats a possible way.
I meant, that the police should provide security for the society and
carrying guns around isn't necessary.

To achieve this, crimes had to reduced (on average).

Who commits a crime? Well if you are frightened, hungry and alone, but
have arms, than this could lead to a crime.

All sorts of drugs are related to crimes, because the drugs allow an
income. That money is 'antisocial', because it feeds the criminals and
leaves wrecked bodies behind.

Greed of all sort is certainly a motivation for crimes. Sadism and
perversion is also related, as is violence.

These anti-social influences should be reduced, to allow a more peaceful
society to develop.

More unknown is, that dirt of various kind is also capable of making
people violent. So a 'clean' environment is good for the people. Its
more healthy, nicer, beautiful, if the neighbourhood isn't full of rubble.

It is really worth the afford to remove all rubble, overpaint graffiti,
fix broken windows and say 'hush hush' to the drug pushers. You can kind
of cure a neighbourhood this way, with moderate affords.

The true measure isn't by how much people have had their arms removed,
but whether they chose not to engage in crime whether they have arms or
not.


Well, it depends on the arms if you end in the hospital or on the
graveyard - after a crime.

It isn't the arms that cause crime, but the will to do so. Removing
arms, doesn't alter the will. One can ALWAYS find a way if they decide
crime is what they desire.



The arms cause 'only' the wounds. But you are right and some investments
in metal health are also necessary.

TH