On 10/16/11 3:52 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 10/16/2011 1:39 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
In ,
John wrote:

On 10/15/2011 11:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
In ,
. net wrote:

"Howard wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 19:00:47 -0700, John
wrote:

Like I say, outside of academia, I just don't see that many MACs

I don't see what academia use, I don't see what most companies use.
But I do see what people have in coffee houses - and there are
lots of
Macs there.

That's about where you're going to find them since 3/4 of Macs
being sold
are the laptops. The Mac desktop market keeps shrinking.


No, Scout:

THE desktop market keeps shrinking.


Light duty use, traveling, you are just stuck with a laptop ...


If by "light duty use" you mean: "just about everything that the average
person wants to do with a computer".


But, try to load one up with massive storage, 32 gigs ram, excellent
video card, etc. and it sucks the battery like pouring water out of a
bucket ... some will try to go total laptop ... but if you need powerful
computing power and support hardware, forget it ... plus, no real
upgrade potential ... you have to trash it every year.

No, actually, you don't.

I'm typing this on my now nearly 4 year old MacBook Pro which does all I
want it to do.

And most people don't need "powerful computing power" [sic]. They didn't
need what passed for powerful 5 years ago and they certainly don't need
the power that a high-end desktop has.


Now I see how you can recommend junk to those contemplating the purchase
of a computer ... laptops are barely acceptable for most all commercial
applications ...

Regards,
JS

Absolute hogwash!

Most commercial applications don't need the horsepower of an Atom
powered netbook, let alone the extra power from a better, faster processor.

And btw, less powerful doesn't mean junk. But then you gamers don't
understand anything but graphic speed and sound anyway...


--
Lloyd