RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   Building a new shortwave tube radio (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/175347-building-new-shortwave-tube-radio.html)

[email protected] November 13th 11 01:24 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On Nov 12, 2:44*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 11/11/2011 10:10 PM, RHF wrote:

...
-wrt- Faraday Cage :
Old Metal {Steel} Garbage Can with a
tight fitting Lid. *-store-holding-
+ The Solid State AM/FM/SW Radio
+ Plenty of Batteries
-or- Re-Chargeable Batteries and a
Solar Charger


-no-tubes-required- ~ RHF
* .


Satellites are withstanding these on an almost daily basis, for years,
if not decades ... doesn't seem to be a real problem anymore ...
however, laying hands to that technology might be a bit of a different
story ... as, while one nation might wants its' own satellites hardened,
it certainly doesn't want the enemies ...

Regards,
JS


As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .

Brenda Ann[_2_] November 13th 11 01:55 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 


wrote in message
...


As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All satellites still use these for output:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traveling-wave_tube


[email protected] November 13th 11 02:59 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On Nov 12, 8:55*pm, "Brenda Ann"
wrote:
wrote in ...

As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----

All satellites still use these for output:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traveling-wave_tube


Oh,sorry. But this may be a miniature tube for microwave frequencies .
Where do they obtain high voltages - it must be smps type . Solar
panels??

Don Pearce[_2_] November 13th 11 07:12 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:24:02 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Nov 12, 2:44*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 11/11/2011 10:10 PM, RHF wrote:

...
-wrt- Faraday Cage :
Old Metal {Steel} Garbage Can with a
tight fitting Lid. *-store-holding-
+ The Solid State AM/FM/SW Radio
+ Plenty of Batteries
-or- Re-Chargeable Batteries and a
Solar Charger


-no-tubes-required- ~ RHF
* .


Satellites are withstanding these on an almost daily basis, for years,
if not decades ... doesn't seem to be a real problem anymore ...
however, laying hands to that technology might be a bit of a different
story ... as, while one nation might wants its' own satellites hardened,
it certainly doesn't want the enemies ...

Regards,
JS


As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .


Dream on. Just about every satellite in the sky uses vacuum tubes. The
TWT (travelling wave tube) is still the way to generate high, reliable
power for space-borne transmitters.

d

John Smith[_7_] November 13th 11 07:37 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On 11/12/2011 5:55 PM, Brenda Ann wrote:


wrote in message
...


As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


All satellites still use these for output:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traveling-wave_tube


Fact of the matter is, you don't need tubes in space, you already have a
much better vacuum than can ever be created on earth ... you simply need
the elements ...

Regards,
JS


John Smith[_7_] November 13th 11 07:37 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On 11/12/2011 6:59 PM, wrote:
On Nov 12, 8:55 pm, "Brenda
wrote:
wrote in ...

As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .

---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----

All satellites still use these for output:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traveling-wave_tube

Oh,sorry. But this may be a miniature tube for microwave frequencies .
Where do they obtain high voltages - it must be smps type . Solar
panels??


NASA knows about voltage converters ...

Regards,
JS


John Smith[_7_] November 13th 11 07:42 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On 11/12/2011 11:12 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:24:02 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Nov 12, 2:44 pm, John wrote:
On 11/11/2011 10:10 PM, RHF wrote:

...
-wrt- Faraday Cage :
Old Metal {Steel} Garbage Can with a
tight fitting Lid. -store-holding-
+ The Solid State AM/FM/SW Radio
+ Plenty of Batteries
-or- Re-Chargeable Batteries and a
Solar Charger

-no-tubes-required- ~ RHF
.

Satellites are withstanding these on an almost daily basis, for years,
if not decades ... doesn't seem to be a real problem anymore ...
however, laying hands to that technology might be a bit of a different
story ... as, while one nation might wants its' own satellites hardened,
it certainly doesn't want the enemies ...

Regards,
JS


As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .


Dream on. Just about every satellite in the sky uses vacuum tubes. The
TWT (travelling wave tube) is still the way to generate high, reliable
power for space-borne transmitters.

d


They would be fools to attempt to boost the weight and fragility of
vacuum tubes into space, if they have any other alternative ... high
power is easily handled with the modern transistors ... the energy
requirements of the heaters is also another no-go ...

Regards,
JS


Don Pearce[_2_] November 13th 11 08:07 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 23:42:22 -0800, John Smith
wrote:

On 11/12/2011 11:12 PM, Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:24:02 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Nov 12, 2:44 pm, John wrote:
On 11/11/2011 10:10 PM, RHF wrote:

...
-wrt- Faraday Cage :
Old Metal {Steel} Garbage Can with a
tight fitting Lid. -store-holding-
+ The Solid State AM/FM/SW Radio
+ Plenty of Batteries
-or- Re-Chargeable Batteries and a
Solar Charger

-no-tubes-required- ~ RHF
.

Satellites are withstanding these on an almost daily basis, for years,
if not decades ... doesn't seem to be a real problem anymore ...
however, laying hands to that technology might be a bit of a different
story ... as, while one nation might wants its' own satellites hardened,
it certainly doesn't want the enemies ...

Regards,
JS

As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes .
That's the reality .


Dream on. Just about every satellite in the sky uses vacuum tubes. The
TWT (travelling wave tube) is still the way to generate high, reliable
power for space-borne transmitters.

d


They would be fools to attempt to boost the weight and fragility of
vacuum tubes into space, if they have any other alternative ... high
power is easily handled with the modern transistors ... the energy
requirements of the heaters is also another no-go ...

Regards,
JS


Energy requirements are not a problem, and neither is G-loading on
takeoff. You are inventing problems where none need exist. TWTs are
mega-reliable devices with a very predictable life curve.

It is much more important to know exactly how long and how well your
satellite is going to work than to hope to get longer by using a
technology that might last longer, but will more probably die
unexpectedly when struck by a cosmic ray burst.

d

Geoffrey S. Mendelson November 13th 11 11:39 AM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 

It is much more important to know exactly how long and how well your
satellite is going to work than to hope to get longer by using a
technology that might last longer, but will more probably die
unexpectedly when struck by a cosmic ray burst.


Sometimes you can not predict how long a satellite will be used. A friend of
mine worked on a civilian satellite for a defense contractor and just before
the division was sold off, cleaned out any old documents and files they had
on it.

Since the satellite he had worked on was way past its expected life (but still
in use), the contracts had long expired, the work was not classified and a
new improved one was due to be launched in a few days, he was told
to dump it all.

A few days later, the booster exploded on the pad, and the replacement
was destroyed.

The sattelite was kept running for many years, although there were no
documents on what to do or how it was built.

Geoff.
--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, N3OWJ/4X1GM
My high blood pressure medicine reduces my midichlorian count. :-(



dave November 13th 11 12:49 PM

Building a new shortwave tube radio
 
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 17:24:02 -0800, arthrnyork wrote:



As far as I know- none of the satellites are using vacuum tubes . That's
the reality .


Almost all of them use TWTAs, a form of vacuum tube, for their final
downlink amplifiers.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com