What candidate is most support, by actual monetary donations, from
military personnel -- the people who are the boots on the ground, see
what the criminals are doing, want real cures?

And, this webpage might answer your questions:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...tary-donations

Regards,
JS

Hils wrote:
On 2011-12-18 22:41, John Smith wrote:

What candidate is most support, by actual monetary donations, from
military personnel -- the people who are the boots on the ground, see
what the criminals are doing, want real cures?

And, this webpage might answer your questions:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...tary-donations



Interesting. It certainly runs counter to some perceptions of the US
military on this side of the pond. Also interesting that Obama received
more such donations than any of the other Republican candidates: perhaps
a recognition of his withdrawal of troops from Iraq as promised. (One of
the few things he's got right.)

Just thinking ahead... how different would the rest of the world become
if the US became strictly non-interventionist?

The rest of the world would have been under a world dictatorship a long
time ago. it would then have been us against the whole world and we
would have probably fell and found ourselves also under the dictatorship.

On Dec 18, 6:17*pm, Hils wrote:

.. Also interesting that Obama received
more such donations than any of the other Republican candidates: perhaps
a recognition of his withdrawal of troops from Iraq as promised. (One of
the few things he's got right.)

Withdrew? Are you serious? The Iraqi's kicked our ass out. Period. The
Sock Puppet In Chief spun it save face and take credit for something
he has no intention of complying with. It calls to mind the spectacle
of a confidence man being chased out of town by an angry mob only to
read later that the huckster was leading a parade of merrymakers.
Total mendacity.

"Hils" wrote in message
...
On 2011-12-18 22:41, John Smith wrote:
What candidate is most support, by actual monetary donations, from
military personnel -- the people who are the boots on the ground, see
what the criminals are doing, want real cures?

And, this webpage might answer your questions:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...tary-donations

Interesting. It certainly runs counter to some perceptions of the US
military on this side of the pond. Also interesting that Obama received
more such donations than any of the other Republican candidates: perhaps a
recognition of his withdrawal of troops from Iraq as promised. (One of the
few things he's got right.)

Just thinking ahead... how different would the rest of the world become if
the US became strictly non-interventionist?

Does that also include not providing aid for countries around the world too
??
After all, that is also being an "interventionist"...

Let's start by defunding the UN and all UN programs.

Truth Teller
On Dec 18, 6:17*pm, Hils
. Also interesting that Obama received
more such donations than any of the other Republican candidates: perhaps
a recognition of his withdrawal of troops from Iraq as promised. (One of
the few things he's got right.)

Withdrew? Are you serious? The Iraqi's kicked our ass out. Period. The
Sock Puppet In Chief spun it save face and take credit for something
he has no intention of complying with. It calls to mind the spectacle
of a confidence man being chased out of town by an angry mob only to
read later that the huckster was leading a parade of merrymakers.
Total mendacity.



Total Dunkirk.


LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/14028.JPG
---
BOOOSH's smartest Iraq Move.
http://www.strangepolitics.com/image...ent/158939.jpg

On 12/18/2011 5:28 PM, John wrote:
Hils wrote:
On 2011-12-18 22:41, John Smith wrote:

What candidate is most support, by actual monetary donations, from
military personnel -- the people who are the boots on the ground, see
what the criminals are doing, want real cures?

And, this webpage might answer your questions:

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...tary-donations



Interesting. It certainly runs counter to some perceptions of the US
military on this side of the pond. Also interesting that Obama
received more such donations than any of the other Republican
candidates: perhaps a recognition of his withdrawal of troops from
Iraq as promised. (One of the few things he's got right.)

Just thinking ahead... how different would the rest of the world
become if the US became strictly non-interventionist?

The rest of the world would have been under a world dictatorship a long
time ago. it would then have been us against the whole world and we
would have probably fell and found ourselves also under the dictatorship.

Korea would be a much better area to combat the type of thing you
mention, however, they have no resources of value for the criminals to
steal ...

No, the puppet masters who own and run, illegally, our public servants
have their agenda, they simply attempt to hide in under guises of
national security and "helping" other nations ... the fact that these
tactics of deceit and deception have worked so well, I just chalk up to
easily fooled morons ...

Another problem is our nanny role with Israel, a country who now needs
to stand on its' own, or find a place where they are wanted ... or else
you can pay for it ...

Regards,
JS

On 12/18/2011 7:44 PM, Truth Teller wrote:
On Dec 18, 6:17 pm, wrote:

. Also interesting that Obama received
more such donations than any of the other Republican candidates: perhaps
a recognition of his withdrawal of troops from Iraq as promised. (One of
the few things he's got right.)

Withdrew? Are you serious? The Iraqi's kicked our ass out. Period. The
Sock Puppet In Chief spun it save face and take credit for something
he has no intention of complying with. It calls to mind the spectacle
of a confidence man being chased out of town by an angry mob only to
read later that the huckster was leading a parade of merrymakers.
Total mendacity.

If we leave Iraqi, really leave, I think that our crooked public
servants and their puppet masters must feel they have the theft of that
countries natural resources pretty well mastered and controlled. They
must have "their men" in strategic positions to assist them in the
manipulation of oil, its' supply and its' prices, so that they can
manage them from here ... else, they will be using OUR military to
support their crimes ...

Regards,
JS

Hils
Yet the people who really run the US have what they really wanted:
....


what they really wanted

A people without HOPE are easier to Control.
In statism lies the certainty of stagnation.
http://www.strangepolitics.com/image...ent/160688.jpg




LIBs. What PRICE their Vision?
---
Suffering from ED? (Excessive Dishonesty?)
Can't remember the Truth? Try the LIBs LIAGRA...
http://www.strangecosmos.com/images/content/137335.jpg