EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On Mar 15, 2:08*pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 13, 1:03 pm, Steve wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42 am, dxAce wrote:

radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.

The evidence points to you being a clown 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I rest my case... there are hundreds of thousands of pages of NNRC,
IRCA, NRC and other club bulletins referring to "veries" as the
accepted term for AM verifications as well as countless magazine
articles, columns and references. Of course, the facts would get in
the way of your obstinate point of view. Just out of curiosity, has
anyone actually seen the QSLs for your claimed 225 confirmed
countries? You protest proven facts way too much to be for real.

EiBi Skeds Updated
 

On Mar 19, 10:37*pm, radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 15, 2:08*pm, dxAce wrote:









radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 13, 1:03 pm, Steve wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42 am, dxAce wrote:

radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.

The evidence points to you being a clown 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

I rest my case... there are hundreds of thousands of pages of NNRC,
IRCA, NRC and other club bulletins referring to "veries" as the
accepted term for AM verifications as well as countless magazine
articles, columns and references. Of course, the facts would get in
the way of your obstinate point of view. Just out of curiosity, has
anyone actually seen the QSLs for your claimed 225 confirmed
countries? You protest proven facts way too much to be for real.

Yes, you've clearly "moved on". I can tell that you have no chip on
your shoulder whatsoever.