On Friday, December 6, 2013 12:08:51 PM UTC-5, jta wrote:
Pedro de Pacas;812367 Wrote:

On 2013-12-01, jta wrote:-



Hey Greg:

Take your bad attitude and stuff it.

You're the only one that has revealed another pirate's identity; that

makes YOU the snitch, doesn't it?-



Hey JTA:



Next time you jump to conclusions, use a mat. You'd stand a better

chance

of picking the right answer (and person) that way.



Hint: I'm not Poet, but I have followed the **** that has gone on in the



North American SWL scene for the past couple of years. Perhaps the

concept of someone not directly involved with any of that crap having an



opinion on the lack of quality or originality in WBNY's programming is

beyond your reckoning, but, whoomph, there it is.



It's pretty ****ing hysterical how you jump to Murphy's defense, though,



even if through an ad-hominem attack on the wrong person. Makes me

wonder what tickles your conscience so badly that a simple critique of

WBNY's repetitiveness can bring you out of the woodwork.



**** you (yes, *you*, John T. Arthur), **** the P.O. Box 1, Belfast, NY



14711 maildrop, and **** all the other cockbags seeking to make this

hobby their own personal ****ing ground to the detriment of other SWLs.



- Pedro.



Talk about someone "seeking to make this hobby their own personal

****ing ground to the detriment of other SWLs"..!



I didn't "jump to Murphy's defense" - YOU jumped to attack him without

cause.



There still is not a single shred of evidence that Murphy did anything,

just lame assumptions by people with a vendetta.



However, there is plenty of proof that Greg Brown (aka John Poet)

revealed the identity of another pirate Operator, so why are you

defending him?









--

jta


'Not a shred of evidence that Murphy did anything' (!!)-- just his I.P. address attached to forwarded emails he sent to Industry Canada (the Canadian counterpart to the FCC) trying to get the Canadian pirate 'Northern Relay Service' busted by them.

http://www.tcsshortwave.com/2012/07/...55-snitch.html

You're read all this before... after which you told me in a private email,
"Congratulations, you proved something." Has your memory gone this bad in old age? Or did you learn only too well the 'Big Lie' technique from your pal, Nixon? (I presume the latter).

Just FYI-- if I wanted to talk about the shortcomings of Murphy, criticizing his programming would be at the bottom of the list. I'd just as soon he kept on doing the same old thing.