| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#1
October 17th 16, 04:15 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
Where?
freerepublic.com Where is hillary? and, www.rense.com/general96/hackedscalia.htm
|
|
#2
October 17th 16, 07:12 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
On 10/16/2016 10:15 PM, DhiaDuit wrote:
freerepublic.com Where is hillary? and, www.rense.com/general96/hackedscalia.htm "If elected, she will be the first genetically modified organism (GMO) president of the United States." Ah, Rense. If we didn't already have a site like this, we'd have to invent one. Still, lots of juicy details about Hillary even if their conspiracy case is bunk. And the phrase "wet works" should be enough to send chills down your spine. But, sorry, Rense, no smoking gun. |
|
#4
October 18th 16, 02:06 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
www.drudgereort.com Paper: How hillary's 'Resting Bitch' face could be swaying voters
|
|
#5
October 18th 16, 10:02 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
On 10/17/2016 4:48 PM, BDK wrote:
In article , says... On 10/16/2016 10:15 PM, DhiaDuit wrote: freerepublic.com Where is hillary? and, www.rense.com/general96/hackedscalia.htm "If elected, she will be the first genetically modified organism (GMO) president of the United States." Ah, Rense. If we didn't already have a site like this, we'd have to invent one. Still, lots of juicy details about Hillary even if their conspiracy case is bunk. And the phrase "wet works" should be enough to send chills down your spine. But, sorry, Rense, no smoking gun. I love the disclaimer on rense that covers their crazy asses.. Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein. The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. As with all controversies, we stand ready to post any and all rebuttals and responses from people mentioned in the material we post. Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. The idea of a free press in America is one that we hold in the highest regard. We believe in bringing our site visitors and program listeners the widest possible array of information that comes to our attention. We have great trust and respect for the American people, and our worldwide audience, and believe them to be fully-capable of making their own decisions and discerning their own realities. Among the thousands of articles posted here for your consideration, there will doubtless be some that you find useless, and possibly offensive, but we believe you will be perceptive enough to realize that even the stories you disagree with have some value in terms of promoting your own further self-definition and insight. Our site is a smorgasbord of material...take what you wish and click or scroll right past that which doesn't interest you. We suggest you don't make 'assumptions' about our official position on issues that are discussed here. That is not what this site is about. We believe it to be unwise to sweep controversy under the carpet. We also firmly believe people should not only read material which they agree with. The opinions expressed through the thousands of stories here do not necessarily represent those of Mr. Rense, his radio program, his website, or his webmaster, Mr. James Neff. We are not going to censor the news and information here. That is for you to do. We strongly recommend not 'assuming' anything. Read, consider, and make your own informed decisions. People 'assumed' the Warren Commission report was accurate. It was not. People 'assumed' the Federal Government would never conduct biochemical experiments on the general populace. But it did, by the score. People 'assumed' the world was once flat. One more time... Neither Jeff Rense nor Rense.com necessarily adhere to, or endorse, any or all of the links, stories, articles, editorials, or products offered by sponsors found on this site, or broadcast on the Jeff Rense radio program. All of the materials and data offered on this site, and on the radio program, are for informational and educational purposes only. And remember: it's all free to you, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Thank you for visiting. Enjoy. BWHAHAHAHAHAAA! I would rather believe the "Onion"... |
|
#6
October 18th 16, 02:06 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 4:02:36 AM UTC-5, Drifter wrote:
On 10/17/2016 4:48 PM, BDK wrote: In article , says... On 10/16/2016 10:15 PM, DhiaDuit wrote: freerepublic.com Where is hillary? and, www.rense.com/general96/hackedscalia.htm "If elected, she will be the first genetically modified organism (GMO) president of the United States." Ah, Rense. If we didn't already have a site like this, we'd have to invent one. Still, lots of juicy details about Hillary even if their conspiracy case is bunk. And the phrase "wet works" should be enough to send chills down your spine. But, sorry, Rense, no smoking gun. I love the disclaimer on rense that covers their crazy asses.. Disclaimer - The posting of stories, commentaries, reports, documents and links (embedded or otherwise) on this site does not in any way, shape or form, implied or otherwise, necessarily express or suggest endorsement or support of any of such posted material or parts therein. The myriad of facts, conjecture, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information in the articles, stories and commentaries posted on this site range from cutting edge hard news and comment to extreme and unusual perspectives. We choose not to sweep uncomfortable material under the rug - where it can grow and fester. We choose not to censor skewed logic and uncomfortable rhetoric. These things reflect the world as it now is - for better and worse. We present multiple facts, perspectives, viewpoints, opinions, analyses, and information. As with all controversies, we stand ready to post any and all rebuttals and responses from people mentioned in the material we post. Journalism is (or used to be) the profession of gathering and presenting a broad panorama of news about the events of our times and presenting it to readers for their own consideration. We believe in the intelligence, judgment and wisdom of our readers to discern for themselves among the data which appears on this site that which is valid and worthy...or otherwise. The idea of a free press in America is one that we hold in the highest regard. We believe in bringing our site visitors and program listeners the widest possible array of information that comes to our attention. We have great trust and respect for the American people, and our worldwide audience, and believe them to be fully-capable of making their own decisions and discerning their own realities. Among the thousands of articles posted here for your consideration, there will doubtless be some that you find useless, and possibly offensive, but we believe you will be perceptive enough to realize that even the stories you disagree with have some value in terms of promoting your own further self-definition and insight. Our site is a smorgasbord of material...take what you wish and click or scroll right past that which doesn't interest you. We suggest you don't make 'assumptions' about our official position on issues that are discussed here. That is not what this site is about. We believe it to be unwise to sweep controversy under the carpet. We also firmly believe people should not only read material which they agree with. The opinions expressed through the thousands of stories here do not necessarily represent those of Mr. Rense, his radio program, his website, or his webmaster, Mr. James Neff. We are not going to censor the news and information here. That is for you to do. We strongly recommend not 'assuming' anything. Read, consider, and make your own informed decisions. People 'assumed' the Warren Commission report was accurate. It was not. People 'assumed' the Federal Government would never conduct biochemical experiments on the general populace. But it did, by the score. People 'assumed' the world was once flat. One more time... Neither Jeff Rense nor Rense.com necessarily adhere to, or endorse, any or all of the links, stories, articles, editorials, or products offered by sponsors found on this site, or broadcast on the Jeff Rense radio program. All of the materials and data offered on this site, and on the radio program, are for informational and educational purposes only. And remember: it's all free to you, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Thank you for visiting. Enjoy. BWHAHAHAHAHAAA! I would rather believe the "Onion"... theguardian.com Why do people dislike hillary clinton? The story goes far back |
|
#7
October 19th 16, 01:22 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
On 10/18/2016 9:44 AM, Hils wrote:
If the shiksa queen was to start a global nuclear war... Where did this thought about Hillary causing a nuclear war ever start? Too many kOOk sites? It would seem more likely to be caused by the clown Trump. He has advocated nuclear proliferation, said "I like war", said "Bomb the **** out of them" -- and on top of that he is notoriously thin-skinned and totally ignorant of international politics ("What, you mean Russia invaded Crimea, I didn't know that".) If you are betting on who will start a nuclear war, it seems the deck is stacked waaaay in favor of the blowhard buffoon Trump. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
|
#8
October 19th 16, 02:21 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 7:22:19 PM UTC-5, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 10/18/2016 9:44 AM, Hils wrote: If the shiksa queen was to start a global nuclear war... Where did this thought about Hillary causing a nuclear war ever start? Too many kOOk sites? It would seem more likely to be caused by the clown Trump. He has advocated nuclear proliferation, said "I like war", said "Bomb the **** out of them" -- and on top of that he is notoriously thin-skinned and totally ignorant of international politics ("What, you mean Russia invaded Crimea, I didn't know that".) If you are betting on who will start a nuclear war, it seems the deck is stacked waaaay in favor of the blowhard buffoon Trump. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus I Agree, John Pilger is NOT a kook. newmatilda? ...Waltzing Matilda, Waltzing Matilda song Youtube |
|
#9
October 19th 16, 05:27 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
On 10/18/2016 9:03 PM, Hils wrote:
On 19/10/16 01:22, Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 10/18/2016 9:44 AM, Hils wrote: If the shiksa queen was to start a global nuclear war... Where did this thought about Hillary causing a nuclear war ever start? Too many kOOk sites? John Pilger is hardly a kook. Well, that may be debatable; although I agree with some of his thoughts, I do not give him a free pass for everything. https://newmatilda.com/2016/03/23/jo...-donald-trump/ Some of his "facts" are provably wrong. = It would seem more likely to be caused by the clown Trump. He has advocated nuclear proliferation, said "I like war", said "Bomb the **** out of them" -- and on top of that he is notoriously thin-skinned and totally ignorant of international politics ("What, you mean Russia invaded Crimea, I didn't know that".) Russia didn't invade Crimea, Russia gave the Crimean people what they wanted. That is *certainly* open to debate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimea...ferendum,_2014 This is as close as the world outside Switzerland has come to real democracy in a very long time. If you are betting on who will start a nuclear war, it seems the deck is stacked waaaay in favor of the blowhard buffoon Trump. There must be some doubt over whether Trump has the spine to resist the pressure from the warmongers who infest much of the US military and administration, Huh? "Resist the warmongers"? Please re-read the above -- where Trump said he *likes* war and to *bomb the **** out of them*. Don't know about you, but that sounds a little (well, OK, a lot) "warmongerish" to me. Doesn't seem like he needs help from anyone else. but I doubt he would initiate such a thing. Well, maybe or maybe not. He is indeed a blowhard, but the statements above seem pretty much to stand on their own. Clinton, on the other hand, has form in enjoying causing people to die unnecessarily. Again, debatable. Qaddafi *was* responsible for a lot of terrorism; also don't pin Pilger's comment about Albright's statement about the death of Iraqi children on Hillary. Finally --and sadly-- sometimes violence has to be used when the USA is considered (for better or for worse) to be the "policeman of the world". Hillary is bad, but IMHO Trump is a lot worse. It seems like we can respectfully agree to disagree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
|
#10
October 19th 16, 06:55 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where?
On Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 11:27:24 AM UTC-5, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 10/18/2016 9:03 PM, Hils wrote: On 19/10/16 01:22, Joe from Kokomo wrote: On 10/18/2016 9:44 AM, Hils wrote: If the shiksa queen was to start a global nuclear war... Where did this thought about Hillary causing a nuclear war ever start? Too many kOOk sites? John Pilger is hardly a kook. Well, that may be debatable; although I agree with some of his thoughts, I do not give him a free pass for everything. https://newmatilda.com/2016/03/23/jo...-donald-trump/ Some of his "facts" are provably wrong. = It would seem more likely to be caused by the clown Trump. He has advocated nuclear proliferation, said "I like war", said "Bomb the **** out of them" -- and on top of that he is notoriously thin-skinned and totally ignorant of international politics ("What, you mean Russia invaded Crimea, I didn't know that".) Russia didn't invade Crimea, Russia gave the Crimean people what they wanted. That is *certainly* open to debate. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimea...ferendum,_2014 This is as close as the world outside Switzerland has come to real democracy in a very long time. If you are betting on who will start a nuclear war, it seems the deck is stacked waaaay in favor of the blowhard buffoon Trump. There must be some doubt over whether Trump has the spine to resist the pressure from the warmongers who infest much of the US military and administration, Huh? "Resist the warmongers"? Please re-read the above -- where Trump said he *likes* war and to *bomb the **** out of them*. Don't know about you, but that sounds a little (well, OK, a lot) "warmongerish" to me. Doesn't seem like he needs help from anyone else. but I doubt he would initiate such a thing. Well, maybe or maybe not. He is indeed a blowhard, but the statements above seem pretty much to stand on their own. Clinton, on the other hand, has form in enjoying causing people to die unnecessarily. Again, debatable. Qaddafi *was* responsible for a lot of terrorism; also don't pin Pilger's comment about Albright's statement about the death of Iraqi children on Hillary. Finally --and sadly-- sometimes violence has to be used when the USA is considered (for better or for worse) to be the "policeman of the world". Hillary is bad, but IMHO Trump is a lot worse. It seems like we can respectfully agree to disagree. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus www.drudgereport.com 'her arse doesn't know what Planet it is on' ...Looka here, armstrongeconomics.com Martial Law Or Electorial College |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
