Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 1:08:33 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:53:22 -0700, allisellis851 wrote: On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:45:58 PM UTC-5, wrote: On Friday, March 23, 2018 at 12:10:55 PM UTC-5, Frank wrote: On Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:49:26 -0700, allisellis851 wrote: www.redstatewatcher.com ...Stormy Daniels didn't take a lie detector test. Why? Because some TwitterK00K is looking at a picture of Stormy Daniels taken before all the lie box paraphernalia was attached? She didn't have those little doohickys on her fingers, that is why she did not take a lie detector test . Some people sayyyyy if you wants to know if somebody is lieing, look at their eye pupils get smaller. ((Photos Lie Detector)) https://newrepublic.com/minutes/1475...olygraph-test- doesnt-reveal-anything ...Lie detector test results are not admisable in a Court of Law. Yep. The "lie detector" doesn't really detect lies. But in K00kworld, we are to believe that an inconclusive test was faked because -- because -- because -- well, I don't know why an inconclusive test would be need to be faked. DNA tests are not 100 percent either, according to a long article I once read in Popular Mechanics magazine not many years ago. .... spacenews.com/u-s-air-force-seeks-1-3-billion-increase-for-space-programs |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|