Why is it called "theory of evolution" if it's a proven fact?

http://www.arn.org/

"that intelligent causes are necessary to explain the complex,
information-rich structures of biology and that these causes are empirically
detectable."

http://www.arn.org/idfaq/What%20is%2...t%20design.htm



http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=23471

"Roger DeHart

"If something in science suddenly becomes so sacrosanct that you can't
question it, then it ceases to be science," said DeHart. "I don't even want to
teach creationism, I just want to teach the flaws of Darwinism," he said. "

http://www.nas.com/ccc/news5-23-01.htm









In article , "Mr. 4X"
wrote:
(Ed Conrad) wrote:



The theory of the evolution of man is the greatest conspiracy
against truth in the history of science, quite likely in the history
of the world.

Isn't it obvious?



De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum: -There's no arguing about matters of taste.
Multum in parvo: - Much in little (small but significant)
Sine qua non: -Indispensible part
Non sequitur: -It does not follow
Cogito ergo sum: - I think therefore I am.
Nota bene: - Note well
Tabula rasa: - Clean slate