| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cut your antenna to the frequency or band of choice. Listen with the
balun in, then listen without it. I'll bet you won't be able to tell a difference. In fact, there will even be a little loss in the balun. The point I'm trying to make is, Cut your antenna to the frequency you want for best performance and you won't need to waste money and time building baluns. KB7ADL Dave wrote in news 6olgv09n55icmuvb2b4f5hi20fbis7e88@4ax.com: Balderdash. A transformer that correctly drives the co-ax is a great advantage. On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 11:20:47 -0600, JJ wrote: Vince Fiscus, KB7ADL wrote: There is no real advantage for a balun on an antenna just for receiving. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Parallel balun problem with wire loop | Antenna | |||
| Adding a 2:1 balun to a multi-band dipole | Antenna | |||
| Balun design / SWR ? | Antenna | |||
| Horizontal loop - balun or no balun ? | Antenna | |||
| Balun Grounding Question ? | Antenna | |||