"David Stinson" wrote in message
...

Money talks, public service walks- BPL is a certainty.

Money's the half of it. Ego and politics are the other half. Pols like
Michael Powell and Billy Tauzin want credit for sweeping away all those
presumably outmoded concerns about RFI so people in rural areas can get the
on ramp to the modern hi-speed info superhighway right there in their
fusebox.


The "null it out- anyone can do it" argument is crap-
works well in theory, poorly in the field.
Even with excellent nulling, QRP and other weak signal work is finished.
Shortwave DXing is finished.

You have three choices-
Give up radio.
Move far enough into the country to avoid the polluted grid,
"Gorilla warfare-" Power lines that leak out, can also leak IN.
50 watts of broadband noise generator plugged into the nearest socket
would do. Note that I would never advocate anything illegal.....
D.S.

As a former US President said, "We could do it, but it would be wrong."

I have to wonder how much BPL access would be knocked out by a sparky old
ozone generating vacuum cleaner. One room? A few houses?

And let's not forget our old nemisis, the bargain basement switchmode
computer power supply. I have one which pumps enough hashy variable
frequency hets to overwhelm even strong local broadcast stations on a radio
in the same room.

Some thief ran, well -- hobbled, off with my arc welder a few years ago. I
never replaced it. Good thing, I now realize.

I kinda doubt electrical interference would cut off somebody's BPL access
entirely. I picture the error rate going up and up, and the connection
speeds going down and down. Maybe even slower than dial-up. Even worse,
the guy who pays for BPL is likely to blame the power company, rather than
the real culprit -- the clown who just doesn't give a damn about RFI.

Frank Dresser

On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:43:12 GMT, Frank Dresser wrote:

Even worse,
the guy who pays for BPL is likely to blame the power company, rather than
the real culprit -- the clown who just doesn't give a damn about RFI.

Aren't they the same in that situation ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane

"Phil Kane" wrote in message
et...
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 16:43:12 GMT, Frank Dresser wrote:

Even worse,
the guy who pays for BPL is likely to blame the power company, rather
than
the real culprit -- the clown who just doesn't give a damn about RFI.

Aren't they the same in that situation ??

--
73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane



Partly. The power company doesn't care. The FCC seems lax in Part 15
enforcement, among other things. Certain congressmen seem to think the only
impediments to the Jetson way of life are outmoded regulations. The
neighbors only think of interference when Tom Brokaw turns green and they
blame it on the SWL's random wire antenna.

The only people who give a damn about RFI are the people who use radio.

I'm not an expert on BPL, but I don't have any faith in the FCC's ability to
look past a glossy demo and into the real world, either. If I had been
invited to the demos, I'd have brought my old vacuum cleaner and my
homebuilt PC with the noisy power supply(which, I assume, is good under Part
15 regs. Ha!). I think somebody would give a damn if everyday electrical
noisemakers slowed BPL.

Frank Dresser

I'm not an expert on BPL, but I don't have any faith in the FCC's ability to
look past a glossy demo and into the real world, either. If I had been
invited to the demos, I'd have brought my old vacuum cleaner and my
homebuilt PC with the noisy power supply(which, I assume, is good under Part
15 regs. Ha!). I think somebody would give a damn if everyday electrical
noisemakers slowed BPL.


Don't know about BPL, but back when they were testing various proposed
broadcast HDTV
transmission standards, one of the devices used in noise tests was
literally an old vacuum cleaner
motor.