LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16   Report Post  
Old September 2nd 03, 06:46 PM
starman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

tom Holden wrote:

starman wrote in message ...
tom Holden wrote:

The DX-394 can be very accurate but factory or post-sale alignment can
be out and component aging can be a factor. LSB and CW1 use one BFO
and switching between these modes produces no change in the beat
frequency. USB and CW2 use another BFO with the same consistent pitch
between modes. [snip]


One of the strangest methods for generating USB and LSB reception that
many of us have ever seen.


What's strange about it? Seems economical by using the same filter for
both USB and LSB. Are there no other radios that take the same
approach?


I've never seen any but there probably is at least one more.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews CB 0 September 24th 04 06:55 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 June 25th 04 08:28 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400 ­ June 11, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 June 16th 04 09:35 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews CB 0 January 18th 04 10:36 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 January 18th 04 10:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017