Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article Bg35b.335858$uu5.68150@sccrnsc04,
"CW" wrote: Did you read the article? No? It shows. "Telamon" wrote in message ... You will only know just how much unwanted noise will be generated until the first time the phone rings while the radio is connected then it will be very quiet. No more noise or signal either after that. The article has been posted numerous times. Did something change? I didn't think so. If you are advocating that this is a good idea then you¹re not very smart. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Smarter than you, no doubt. Advocating it? No. There are a lot of problems
with it. The main thing being noise to the point it would likely be useless but the ringer voltage is not a concern if done correctly. "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article Bg35b.335858$uu5.68150@sccrnsc04, "CW" wrote: Did you read the article? No? It shows. "Telamon" wrote in message ... You will only know just how much unwanted noise will be generated until the first time the phone rings while the radio is connected then it will be very quiet. No more noise or signal either after that. The article has been posted numerous times. Did something change? I didn't think so. If you are advocating that this is a good idea then you¹re not very smart. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In article CRe5b.337247$YN5.232719@sccrnsc01,
"CW" wrote: Smarter than you, no doubt. Advocating it? No. There are a lot of problems with it. The main thing being noise to the point it would likely be useless but the ringer voltage is not a concern if done correctly. "Telamon" wrote in message .. . In article Bg35b.335858$uu5.68150@sccrnsc04, "CW" wrote: Did you read the article? No? It shows. "Telamon" wrote in message ... You will only know just how much unwanted noise will be generated until the first time the phone rings while the radio is connected then it will be very quiet. No more noise or signal either after that. The article has been posted numerous times. Did something change? I didn't think so. If you are advocating that this is a good idea then you¹re not very smart. OK smart-ass you going to build the filter ³correctly² for every newbe hobbyist in the group that may want to try it? No? Then why bother posting to the thread. Since it¹s got a lot of problems and most likely useless you must be looking for an argument. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Antenna and lack of intermod | Scanner |