RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   FRG-7 or Satellit 800 (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/38205-frg-7-satellit-800-a.html)

Robert Davis September 16th 03 03:06 AM

FRG-7 or Satellit 800
 
As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800
for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with
one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was
just not pleasant to use.

I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able
to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity
on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now
22 year old Kenwood R-1000.

For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the
Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it
is a very good deal.

--
Charter member of the Church of the Easily Amused
Robert (Bob) Davis Amateur Radio K0FPC

starman September 16th 03 06:52 AM

Robert Davis wrote:

As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800
for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with
one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was
just not pleasant to use.

I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able
to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity
on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now
22 year old Kenwood R-1000.

For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the
Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it
is a very good deal.


I guess the sync' detector on the '800' didn't impress you. I would
choose the '800' over the FRG-7 for that reason alone. However the FRG-7
is a good deal for a beginner.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

DeWayne September 16th 03 09:45 AM


"starman" wrote in message
...
Robert Davis wrote:

As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800
for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with
one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was
just not pleasant to use.

I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able
to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity
on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now
22 year old Kenwood R-1000.

For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the
Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it
is a very good deal.


I guess the sync' detector on the '800' didn't impress you. I would
choose the '800' over the FRG-7 for that reason alone. However the FRG-7
is a good deal for a beginner.


Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would have
that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800!
DeWayne



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----




Randy Padawer September 17th 03 05:17 AM

Actually, DeWayne, the FRG-7 didn't drift at all -- the reason is
because it was based upon an auto-correcting Wadley loop circuit. If
you do a Google search on "Wadley loop" or "Barlow-Wadley" you'll find
quite a bit of information about that type of receiver. It was a
novel circuit, which afforded terrific accuracy (rare in analog dials
on consumer-grade shortwave radios) and zero drift.
Randy, WA4FJF

"DeWayne" wrote in message ...
Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would have
that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800!
DeWayne


DeWayne September 17th 03 07:06 AM


"Randy Padawer" wrote in message
om...
Actually, DeWayne, the FRG-7 didn't drift at all -- the reason is
because it was based upon an auto-correcting Wadley loop circuit. If
you do a Google search on "Wadley loop" or "Barlow-Wadley" you'll find
quite a bit of information about that type of receiver. It was a
novel circuit, which afforded terrific accuracy (rare in analog dials
on consumer-grade shortwave radios) and zero drift.
Randy, WA4FJF


Thanks for the good news. I always avoided trying a FRG-7 for that reason. I
bought a new Panasonic RF-4900 from Gilfer. I could let it warm up for hours
and it would still drift nearly two kHz. I couldn't record anything without
babysitting. Other than that I loved the 4900. I'd take the SAT 800 over the
RF-4900 any day though.
DeWayne


"DeWayne" wrote in message

...
Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would

have
that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800!
DeWayne





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com