Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800
for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was just not pleasant to use. I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now 22 year old Kenwood R-1000. For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it is a very good deal. -- Charter member of the Church of the Easily Amused Robert (Bob) Davis Amateur Radio K0FPC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robert Davis wrote:
As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800 for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was just not pleasant to use. I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now 22 year old Kenwood R-1000. For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it is a very good deal. I guess the sync' detector on the '800' didn't impress you. I would choose the '800' over the FRG-7 for that reason alone. However the FRG-7 is a good deal for a beginner. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "starman" wrote in message ... Robert Davis wrote: As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800 for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was just not pleasant to use. I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now 22 year old Kenwood R-1000. For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it is a very good deal. I guess the sync' detector on the '800' didn't impress you. I would choose the '800' over the FRG-7 for that reason alone. However the FRG-7 is a good deal for a beginner. Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would have that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800! DeWayne -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, DeWayne, the FRG-7 didn't drift at all -- the reason is
because it was based upon an auto-correcting Wadley loop circuit. If you do a Google search on "Wadley loop" or "Barlow-Wadley" you'll find quite a bit of information about that type of receiver. It was a novel circuit, which afforded terrific accuracy (rare in analog dials on consumer-grade shortwave radios) and zero drift. Randy, WA4FJF "DeWayne" wrote in message ... Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would have that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800! DeWayne |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Randy Padawer" wrote in message om... Actually, DeWayne, the FRG-7 didn't drift at all -- the reason is because it was based upon an auto-correcting Wadley loop circuit. If you do a Google search on "Wadley loop" or "Barlow-Wadley" you'll find quite a bit of information about that type of receiver. It was a novel circuit, which afforded terrific accuracy (rare in analog dials on consumer-grade shortwave radios) and zero drift. Randy, WA4FJF Thanks for the good news. I always avoided trying a FRG-7 for that reason. I bought a new Panasonic RF-4900 from Gilfer. I could let it warm up for hours and it would still drift nearly two kHz. I couldn't record anything without babysitting. Other than that I loved the 4900. I'd take the SAT 800 over the RF-4900 any day though. DeWayne "DeWayne" wrote in message ... Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would have that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800! DeWayne |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Grundig Satellit 3400 Professional | Shortwave | |||
Grundig Satellit 800 Newbie Questions | Shortwave | |||
AM Portion of Grundig Satellit 800 Millenium Reception | Shortwave | |||
GRUNDIG SATELLIT 800 MILLENNIUM SHORTWAVE RADIO (should I buy it !) | Shortwave | |||
Icom R75 or Grundig Satellit 800? | Shortwave |