Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 16th 03, 03:06 AM
Robert Davis
 
Posts: n/a
Default FRG-7 or Satellit 800

As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800
for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with
one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was
just not pleasant to use.

I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able
to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity
on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now
22 year old Kenwood R-1000.

For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the
Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it
is a very good deal.

--
Charter member of the Church of the Easily Amused
Robert (Bob) Davis Amateur Radio K0FPC
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 16th 03, 06:52 AM
starman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Robert Davis wrote:

As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800
for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with
one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was
just not pleasant to use.

I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able
to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity
on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now
22 year old Kenwood R-1000.

For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the
Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it
is a very good deal.


I guess the sync' detector on the '800' didn't impress you. I would
choose the '800' over the FRG-7 for that reason alone. However the FRG-7
is a good deal for a beginner.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #3   Report Post  
Old September 16th 03, 09:45 AM
DeWayne
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"starman" wrote in message
...
Robert Davis wrote:

As a former FRG-7 owner, and as a borrower of a Satellit 800
for a few days, I still like the FRG-7 better. I agree with
one poster who did not like the looks of the 800. It was
just not pleasant to use.

I found no lack of sensitivity in the FRG-7. I was not able
to compare the radios side by side. The variable selectivity
on the 800 is a good thing, but not as good as in my now
22 year old Kenwood R-1000.

For a price of $150 to $175, which is what I have seen the
Yaesu receivers actually sell for at hamfests, I think it
is a very good deal.


I guess the sync' detector on the '800' didn't impress you. I would
choose the '800' over the FRG-7 for that reason alone. However the FRG-7
is a good deal for a beginner.


Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would have
that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800!
DeWayne



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



  #4   Report Post  
Old September 17th 03, 05:17 AM
Randy Padawer
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Actually, DeWayne, the FRG-7 didn't drift at all -- the reason is
because it was based upon an auto-correcting Wadley loop circuit. If
you do a Google search on "Wadley loop" or "Barlow-Wadley" you'll find
quite a bit of information about that type of receiver. It was a
novel circuit, which afforded terrific accuracy (rare in analog dials
on consumer-grade shortwave radios) and zero drift.
Randy, WA4FJF

"DeWayne" wrote in message ...
Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would have
that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800!
DeWayne

  #5   Report Post  
Old September 17th 03, 07:06 AM
DeWayne
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Randy Padawer" wrote in message
om...
Actually, DeWayne, the FRG-7 didn't drift at all -- the reason is
because it was based upon an auto-correcting Wadley loop circuit. If
you do a Google search on "Wadley loop" or "Barlow-Wadley" you'll find
quite a bit of information about that type of receiver. It was a
novel circuit, which afforded terrific accuracy (rare in analog dials
on consumer-grade shortwave radios) and zero drift.
Randy, WA4FJF


Thanks for the good news. I always avoided trying a FRG-7 for that reason. I
bought a new Panasonic RF-4900 from Gilfer. I could let it warm up for hours
and it would still drift nearly two kHz. I couldn't record anything without
babysitting. Other than that I loved the 4900. I'd take the SAT 800 over the
RF-4900 any day though.
DeWayne


"DeWayne" wrote in message

...
Didn't those old Yaesu's drift like crazy? I doubt if the SAT 800 would

have
that problem. And yes, the sync detector is awsome on the SAT 800!
DeWayne





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Grundig Satellit 3400 Professional Igor Gros Shortwave 5 January 3rd 05 10:12 AM
Grundig Satellit 800 Newbie Questions David Shortwave 4 August 29th 03 08:42 PM
AM Portion of Grundig Satellit 800 Millenium Reception Wayne Watson Shortwave 2 August 3rd 03 04:19 PM
GRUNDIG SATELLIT 800 MILLENNIUM SHORTWAVE RADIO (should I buy it !) Paul Shortwave 3 July 3rd 03 04:39 PM
Icom R75 or Grundig Satellit 800? Scannergirl2 Shortwave 2 July 1st 03 04:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017