LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 26th 03, 03:46 AM
CW
 
Posts: n/a
Default

For the reasons you give and others, I tend to think this is along the lines
of Y2K. Big panic but...
"tommyknocker" wrote in message
...
GeorgeF wrote:



So why is the FCC going through with it? I would think that the heavy
military use of HF (I'm including the Coast Guard as part of the armed
forces) would keep BPL from happening. Mil HF comms pop up on unexpected
freqs at odd times (probably to keep other people from listening) and
interference from 2-30 Mhz would be a big problem, especially at bases
in urban areas like Camp Pendleton and Travis AFB.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415 ­ September 24, 2004 Radionews CB 0 September 24th 04 05:55 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412 ­ September 3, 2004 Radionews General 0 September 4th 04 08:35 PM
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1384 February 20, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 February 27th 04 05:21 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Broadcasting 0 January 19th 04 12:57 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 Radionews Dx 0 January 18th 04 09:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017