Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps, but at $0.00, it's better than nothing.
Radio Netherlands, concerning this receiver, continued with: http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/icr75a.html "In our opinion, there is no need to purchase an after-market external DSP unit (c.f. "Digital Signal Processing... and a look at two market leaders of post-receiver processing units", World Radio TV Handbook, 1997 edition)." though I imagine that the article on the Icom R-75 was written in the year 2000, and that progress has been made in External DSPs. Regards. In article , David wrote: The DSP isn't worth worrying about, IMHO. Outboard DSPs all work way better that the one that Icom sells. On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:35:05 GMT, (Soliloquy) wrote: |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Soliloquy" wrote in message ... Perhaps, but at $0.00, it's better than nothing. I was disappointed in my R75's audio, until I turned off the DSP. Then I was quite pleased! But the DSP is fun to play around with. DeWayne Radio Netherlands, concerning this receiver, continued with: http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/icr75a.html "In our opinion, there is no need to purchase an after-market external DSP unit (c.f. "Digital Signal Processing... and a look at two market leaders of post-receiver processing units", World Radio TV Handbook, 1997 edition)." though I imagine that the article on the Icom R-75 was written in the year 2000, and that progress has been made in External DSPs. Regards. In article , David wrote: The DSP isn't worth worrying about, IMHO. Outboard DSPs all work way better that the one that Icom sells. On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:35:05 GMT, (Soliloquy) wrote: |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|