Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently had the fortune of convincing my wife that the Icom R-75 available
at AES in Cleveland (et al.) was too good a deal to pass on, and that an early Christmas present might be in order. Fortunately she bought it, (the story and the radio). $450 with a free DSP unit. Not being the worlds most intelligent person, nor the most adroit, I must say that I had a few moments of consternation installing the DSP unit. If you get the R-75 with the UT-106 DSP, open the DSP box and place the enclosed instructions and leatherette case far from view. They contain no information and are not used to install the UT-106 in the R-75. Next, open the manual for the R-75, and follow the instructions for the installation of the UT-106 DSP unit. P.S., the view showing the installation of the "Velcro Pad" is virtually indecipherable. Oddly enough, while reading the Radio Netherlands report on the R-75, I came across the following: http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/icr75.html "Spot the Difference with the Sync What is the singular failing of this receiver? In our opinion, there is virtually no difference between synchronous AM and AM reception. The synchronous mode includes both sidebands; there is no option to choose the lower or upper sideband. The Lowe HF-150 synchronous modes and performance are far superior. We urge that ICOM correct the synchronous performance in future models and make available a retrofit ROM available to current customers. Fortunately all is not lost here. As the receiver's SSB reception is quite good, in difficult or crowded band conditions, we simply tune in the appropriate sideband of the desired signal and, if necessary, adjust the PBT controls." Notice the last paragraph, using the receiver's SSB abilities to substitute for the lack of an adequate synchronous detector. I've been saying this for some time, though some people insist that you need Synchronous Detection, else life isn't worth living. Since my Yaesu FRG-100 and FT-840 don't have synchronous detection, this is what I have done for certain difficult reception situations. Anyway, I am a Yaesu addict, but I must say I am impressed with the R-75. Preamps, DSP, Dual Pass Band Tuning, etc. Very nice, and certainly worth the money. Apparently the DSP offer isn't a once in a lifetime deal, so that anyone wishing to get the combination of radio with the DSP for the price of the radio alone, if it is not affordable now, and if the offer "expires", it will no doubt be offered again. The following was on the Radio Netherlands R-75 review page: "We should note that in North America there is an ongoing sales promotion that offers the UT-106 DSP module free to purchasers of the receiver before March 30, 2000. After sending in the registration card and coupon, we received the module from ICOM America in two weeks time. It took us about 10 minutes to install the small circuit board and plug in three cables. We cannot determine if there is a similar promotion elsewhere in the world. Check with your dealer." Regards |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Perhaps, but at $0.00, it's better than nothing.
Radio Netherlands, concerning this receiver, continued with: http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/icr75a.html "In our opinion, there is no need to purchase an after-market external DSP unit (c.f. "Digital Signal Processing... and a look at two market leaders of post-receiver processing units", World Radio TV Handbook, 1997 edition)." though I imagine that the article on the Icom R-75 was written in the year 2000, and that progress has been made in External DSPs. Regards. In article , David wrote: The DSP isn't worth worrying about, IMHO. Outboard DSPs all work way better that the one that Icom sells. On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:35:05 GMT, (Soliloquy) wrote: |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Soliloquy" wrote in message ... Perhaps, but at $0.00, it's better than nothing. I was disappointed in my R75's audio, until I turned off the DSP. Then I was quite pleased! But the DSP is fun to play around with. DeWayne Radio Netherlands, concerning this receiver, continued with: http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/icr75a.html "In our opinion, there is no need to purchase an after-market external DSP unit (c.f. "Digital Signal Processing... and a look at two market leaders of post-receiver processing units", World Radio TV Handbook, 1997 edition)." though I imagine that the article on the Icom R-75 was written in the year 2000, and that progress has been made in External DSPs. Regards. In article , David wrote: The DSP isn't worth worrying about, IMHO. Outboard DSPs all work way better that the one that Icom sells. On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:35:05 GMT, (Soliloquy) wrote: |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You may also want to consider getting the Kiwa mods for the AM sync and the
audio section. I have an R-75 and sent it to Kiwa for the mods. It was well worth it. -- Respectfully, Michael Home Page: http://md_dxing.tripod.com/ Northern NJ R75 w/DSP, Kiwa agc/sync & audio mods G5RV & 200ft longwire w/ICE-180 MFJ-1048 preselector SoundBlstr Live PC card w/five piece Cambridge speakers & full software mixer/eq. "Soliloquy" wrote in message ... I recently had the fortune of convincing my wife that the Icom R-75 available at AES in Cleveland (et al.) was too good a deal to pass on, and that an early Christmas present might be in order. Fortunately she bought it, (the story and the radio). $450 with a free DSP unit. Not being the worlds most intelligent person, nor the most adroit, I must say that I had a few moments of consternation installing the DSP unit. If you get the R-75 with the UT-106 DSP, open the DSP box and place the enclosed instructions and leatherette case far from view. They contain no information and are not used to install the UT-106 in the R-75. Next, open the manual for the R-75, and follow the instructions for the installation of the UT-106 DSP unit. P.S., the view showing the installation of the "Velcro Pad" is virtually indecipherable. Oddly enough, while reading the Radio Netherlands report on the R-75, I came across the following: http://www.rnw.nl/realradio/icr75.html "Spot the Difference with the Sync What is the singular failing of this receiver? In our opinion, there is virtually no difference between synchronous AM and AM reception. The synchronous mode includes both sidebands; there is no option to choose the lower or upper sideband. The Lowe HF-150 synchronous modes and performance are far superior. We urge that ICOM correct the synchronous performance in future models and make available a retrofit ROM available to current customers. Fortunately all is not lost here. As the receiver's SSB reception is quite good, in difficult or crowded band conditions, we simply tune in the appropriate sideband of the desired signal and, if necessary, adjust the PBT controls." Notice the last paragraph, using the receiver's SSB abilities to substitute for the lack of an adequate synchronous detector. I've been saying this for some time, though some people insist that you need Synchronous Detection, else life isn't worth living. Since my Yaesu FRG-100 and FT-840 don't have synchronous detection, this is what I have done for certain difficult reception situations. Anyway, I am a Yaesu addict, but I must say I am impressed with the R-75. Preamps, DSP, Dual Pass Band Tuning, etc. Very nice, and certainly worth the money. Apparently the DSP offer isn't a once in a lifetime deal, so that anyone wishing to get the combination of radio with the DSP for the price of the radio alone, if it is not affordable now, and if the offer "expires", it will no doubt be offered again. The following was on the Radio Netherlands R-75 review page: "We should note that in North America there is an ongoing sales promotion that offers the UT-106 DSP module free to purchasers of the receiver before March 30, 2000. After sending in the registration card and coupon, we received the module from ICOM America in two weeks time. It took us about 10 minutes to install the small circuit board and plug in three cables. We cannot determine if there is a similar promotion elsewhere in the world. Check with your dealer." Regards |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Soliloquy wrote:
"As the receiver's SSB reception is quite good, in difficult or crowded band conditions, we simply tune in the appropriate sideband of the desired signal and, if necessary, adjust the PBT controls." Notice the last paragraph, using the receiver's SSB abilities to substitute for the lack of an adequate synchronous detector. I've been saying this for some time, though some people insist that you need Synchronous Detection, else life isn't worth living. Since my Yaesu FRG-100 and FT-840 don't have synchronous detection, this is what I have done for certain difficult reception situations. The method (discribed above) for tuning an AM signal using the SSB mode is called 'Exalted Carrier Single Sideband' or ECSS. It works quite well, providing the receiver has the ability to tune at 1-Khz increments and is also very stable. This is important if you're listening to music. The R-75 seems to fit these requirements. The advantage of a real syncronous detector is it works independently of tuning accuracy and/or stability, so you don't have to keep adjusting it after it's locked on the signal. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:25:49 -0400, starman wrote:
Soliloquy wrote: "As the receiver's SSB reception is quite good, in difficult or crowded band conditions, we simply tune in the appropriate sideband of the desired signal and, if necessary, adjust the PBT controls." Notice the last paragraph, using the receiver's SSB abilities to substitute for the lack of an adequate synchronous detector. I've been saying this for some time, though some people insist that you need Synchronous Detection, else life isn't worth living. Since my Yaesu FRG-100 and FT-840 don't have synchronous detection, this is what I have done for certain difficult reception situations. The method (discribed above) for tuning an AM signal using the SSB mode is called 'Exalted Carrier Single Sideband' or ECSS. It works quite well, providing the receiver has the ability to tune at 1-Khz increments and is also very stable. This is important if you're listening to music. The R-75 seems to fit these requirements. The advantage of a real syncronous detector is it works independently of tuning accuracy and/or stability, so you don't have to keep adjusting it after it's locked on the signal. There is another advantage. Synchronous AM detection phase locks to the on air carrier. Without it, the phase relationship between the carrier and sidebands is unknown, resulting is some degree of phase distortion. Given the choice between phase distortion, and no intelligbility at all, phase distortion wins every time. That is why SSB doesn't sound so great, phase distortion because the relationship between the sideband and the carrier is unknown. There are ways with ISB to establish the phase relationship (The ISB's are generated with carriers at quadrature).. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|