he will be bak
 

he will be back stronger than ever .

at least he admitted COMPLETE resposibility , not like bubba

WHo?

Elvis ?

No he didn't. He lied like he always lies.

If the pills aren't in an amber bottle with a pharmacy label with your
name on it; if they instead come in a Ziploc bag; they ain't
prescription medications. They are street drugs. They are illicit
narcotics.

When someone exchanges a box of money for a box of bills he is
''scoring dope''.

Limbaugh is just another POS narcotics addict junkie who will have to
hit bottom and hate his old self if he expects to get better. People
who throw their lives away for a molecule have much bigger problems
than a pinched nerve in their spine. He has some very deep
''issues''.

Demons, to be sure.

Admitted complete responsibility? After 6 years!!!

He had no choice but to say something. He is making deals like crazy
to stay out of jail. He is going to roll over like a scared little
girl.

I'd give a million bucks for a tape of him dope sick...

On 12 Oct 2003 01:13:51 GMT, (Wbelsito) wrote:

he will be back stronger than ever .

at least he admitted COMPLETE resposibility , not like bubba

Plenty of good people have fallen into the trap of addiction when given
painkillers over a long term.

It should also be noted that he tried short-term addiction therapies twice,
but was not able to overcome it in that brief period. This time, he will
have a month, and he will also have a huge outpouring of support from his
fans that he never had before. Rush will do just fine.

It's obvious you're preturbed that he's been able to almost single-handedly
demolish your socialist liberal agenda over the last few years with a
three-hour radio show. His support of personal freedoms, small government
living within a modest tax environment, foreign policy in the true best
interest of US citizens, and a belief in God have made great advances over
the last few years.

And that's exactly why twits like you take such glee in his problems.

More moderate people have been taken aback by the venom and hate coming from
the left on this matter. You have done yourself no favors.

I can only imagine how well he's going to do when he returns, now that you
and your ilk are being seen for what you are.

Stinger
Picayune, MS


"David" wrote in message
...
No he didn't. He lied like he always lies.

If the pills aren't in an amber bottle with a pharmacy label with your
name on it; if they instead come in a Ziploc bag; they ain't
prescription medications. They are street drugs. They are illicit
narcotics.

When someone exchanges a box of money for a box of bills he is
''scoring dope''.

Limbaugh is just another POS narcotics addict junkie who will have to
hit bottom and hate his old self if he expects to get better. People
who throw their lives away for a molecule have much bigger problems
than a pinched nerve in their spine. He has some very deep
''issues''.

Demons, to be sure.

Admitted complete responsibility? After 6 years!!!

He had no choice but to say something. He is making deals like crazy
to stay out of jail. He is going to roll over like a scared little
girl.

I'd give a million bucks for a tape of him dope sick...

On 12 Oct 2003 01:13:51 GMT, (Wbelsito) wrote:

he will be back stronger than ever .

at least he admitted COMPLETE resposibility , not like bubba

"Stinger" wrote:
| It's obvious you're preturbed that he's been able to almost
single-handedly
| demolish your socialist liberal agenda over the last few years with a
| three-hour radio show.

Let's not forget that he also just about single - handedly saved
AM radio in America.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/03

Won't he be back for jail? Hasn't Rush repeatedly said something to
the effect that drug addicts should be in jail? We must presume
innocence prior to guilt, but if we are to believe his former
employee, there seems to the possiblity of illegal activity.

It doesn't matter how he saved AM radio or the country for that
matter. He reminds me of Bill Bennett, rather hypocritical as he was.
Will Rush be given a fair hearing and take the consequences? I
suspect his fame and fortune will give him a pass so he can continue
telling us on his radio show who should be in jail.

Oh joy. He saved AM radio. Call the Nobel committee.

On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:22:04 GMT, "Stephen M.H. Lawrence"
wrote:


"Stinger" wrote:
| It's obvious you're preturbed that he's been able to almost
single-handedly
| demolish your socialist liberal agenda over the last few years with a
| three-hour radio show.

Let's not forget that he also just about single - handedly saved
AM radio in America.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/03

Duuuude! You're, like, so coool 'n stuff! KNAC rocks,
'n stuff!

I sniff a conflict of interest. You jealous that Rush has thousands
more listeners than you and/or your favorite station?

73,

S.L.

"David" wrote in message
...
| Oh joy. He saved AM radio. Call the Nobel committee.
|
| On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:22:04 GMT, "Stephen M.H. Lawrence"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Stinger" wrote:
| | It's obvious you're preturbed that he's been able to almost
| single-handedly
| | demolish your socialist liberal agenda over the last few years with a
| | three-hour radio show.
|
| Let's not forget that he also just about single - handedly saved
| AM radio in America.
|
|
| ---
| Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
| Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
| Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/03
|
|


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/03

"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message ink.net...
Duuuude! You're, like, so coool 'n stuff! KNAC rocks,
'n stuff!

I sniff a conflict of interest. You jealous that Rush has thousands
more listeners than you and/or your favorite station?

73,

S.L.

"David" wrote in message
...
| Oh joy. He saved AM radio. Call the Nobel committee.
|
| On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:22:04 GMT, "Stephen M.H. Lawrence"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Stinger" wrote:
| | It's obvious you're preturbed that he's been able to almost
single-handedly
| | demolish your socialist liberal agenda over the last few years with a
| | three-hour radio show.
|
| Let's not forget that he also just about single - handedly saved
| AM radio in America.

Rush didn't "save" anything; he has helped to destroy AM radio in the
USA. Of course he had help from Clear Channel, Infinity/Viacom, and
the FCC!

Please try to keep in mind that the guy is only an ENTERTAINER, not a
political guru.

"Richard Cranium" wrote in message
om...

Rush didn't "save" anything; he has helped to destroy AM radio in the
USA.

I have to disagree, Richard. The only thing Rush "destroyed" was the
careers of dozens of talentless "time & temp" jocks when he took over their
time-slots. It sounds like you're just upset with his ideology (and the
fact that he's been successful) to me.

It's no secret that after suffering significant listener decline (to FM)
over the last two decades, the "talk" format has saved AM radio in the USA.
And Rush is the king of talk radio, fostering scores of imitators, both
local and syndicated.

Like him or hate him, Rush played a very large part in reestablishing the
commercial viability of AM radio, because without ratings, commercial radio
was doomed to continue its decline. It was only after Limbaugh sucessfully
syndicated and aced his time slots that we saw the way paved for others,
including Art Bell. It is simply intellectually dishonest not to give the
Rush Limbaugh radio program the credit deserved for having done this with
respect to AM radio. You may not like it, but it's the truth.

Of course he had help from Clear Channel, Infinity/Viacom, and
the FCC!

Exactly what innuendo are you hinting at here? That the FCC, Clear Channel
and Viacom have colluded with a secret, sinister plan to push Limbaugh on
the world? Listen, I'm no fan of Clear Channel or Infinity (or Powell's
FCC either for that matter). I like the idea of a lot of independent owners
competing with each other for listeners. But statements like he had help
from them (implying some sort of agenda) are just silly.

Frankly, I don't see what any of these outfits have to do with Rush, other
than that a few of their stations are among the over 600 that carry his
broadcasts. Our local New Orleans 50KW'er, WWL-AM isn't affilliated with
Clear Channel or Infinity, but carries his show, as do scores of independent
broadcasters.

Are you just hissy-fitting about big media? If so, say so -- lots of us
would agree.


Please try to keep in mind that the guy is only an ENTERTAINER, not a
political guru.

So was Johnny Carson. That doesn't marginalize his influence. There was a
time when commentary in Carson's opening monologue for "The Tonight Show"
was acknowledged to have an enormous effect upon public opinion. The same
has been true for Rush in the past (as he and his audience found each
other), and will probably continue when he returns.

Just my observations...

-- Stinger
ATS-909
FR-200
CCRadio+

"p-j" wrote in message
...


And conservatives typically label them as weak or some other variety of
adjective for losers.

Absolutely right. Nobody's praising Limbaugh for this, either.

According to Bush, he is a terrorist.

This is the kind of stretch that makes the rhetoric from the left so
amazingly stupid.

Po' folks get their homes smashed up and seized for exactly what Rush Liar
did.

"Po' folks?" Going for a little "street cred" there, P-J? "Da man dun
dissed joo, dude...Chill." (Yes, I speak Jive ;^))

Gotta love that rule of law.

Right again. Of course, you're being sarcastic, but that simply illustrates
how far into left field you've wandered. Rule of law == good. Anarchy ==
bad. Trust me on this one -- you're not helping your side of the argument
here.

As for all the whining idiocy I see you posting about Rush or Bush being
socialist, fascist or other nasty labels (through innuendo -- gotta love
innuendo --never give a fact or a coherent, logical argument -- just pretend
it's true and move on), I have no idea who you're listening to, but whatever
you do, don't drink the Kool-Aid.


"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism." - liberal Thomas Jefferson

Liberal? Muahahaaha! Once again, you're not just wrong, you're STUPID
wrong. It just "felt" like he was liberal in your pretend world, didn't it?

Thomas Jefferson, the conservative Republican framer of the constitution
that put the word "God" throughout the Declaration of Independence, on our
money, in the Constitution, etc. and insisted on limited "checks and
balances" government with a strong emphasis on states' rights was a classic
Republican. John Adams was the foremost liberal (Federalist Party) at the
time. Thomas Jefferson (Republican Party) opposed John Adams for the
presidency and beat Adams by eight electoral votes in the first turnover of
power for the USA. (Here's a link....learn.
http://www.poplarforest.org/Democracy-Adams/ ).

Next time, get your facts straight before you get diarrhea of the keyboard.

Have a nice day.

-- Stinger

In article ,
(Richard Cranium) writes:


Please try to keep in mind that the guy is only an ENTERTAINER, not a
political guru.


Entertainer and Rabble Rouser;

- Checked out his show, IMHO this guy can pontificate like mad,
but can't link more than three dots at a time...

May he have good luck leading a Drug Free Life.
If he's in a group setting it may open his eyes..

It's a free email host. I have nothing to do with them otherwise.

(BTW Clear Channel owns them and they are in the Top 10 worldwide for
internet radio).

On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:51:39 GMT, "Stephen M.H. Lawrence"
wrote:

Duuuude! You're, like, so coool 'n stuff! KNAC rocks,
'n stuff!

I sniff a conflict of interest. You jealous that Rush has thousands
more listeners than you and/or your favorite station?

73,

S.L.

"David" wrote in message
.. .
| Oh joy. He saved AM radio. Call the Nobel committee.
|
| On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 19:22:04 GMT, "Stephen M.H. Lawrence"
| wrote:
|
|
| "Stinger" wrote:
| | It's obvious you're preturbed that he's been able to almost
| single-handedly
| | demolish your socialist liberal agenda over the last few years with a
| | three-hour radio show.
|
| Let's not forget that he also just about single - handedly saved
| AM radio in America.
|
|
| ---
| Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
| Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
| Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/03
|
|


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/03

"p-j" wrote in message
.. .
All I hear from conservatives is praise. Other than a couple columnists,
there hasn't been any criticism. But you don't adress the point. What
about condemnation?

Condemnation is something that most people reserve until they have all the
facts. Right now, we don't, so you hear something in line with
disappointment.


I know this is hard for you to figure out, but I'm not left, I'm extreme
right wing.

Gee, you're really doing wonders for your cause. Why not write a coherent
argument and list examples instead of speaking in broad generalities?
Attacks on Bush's conservative policies look the same whether they come from
the left or the faaaarrrr right.


I have to wonder where you think one of the most controlled substances
in the world came from? Doctors underprescribe opiate pain killers to
people in the last hours of their lives for fear of the conservative's
DEA. What do you think the pathway of Rush's massive addiction supply
was?

This I am in full agreement with you on.


SNIP

Surely you believe that an immediate raid by paramilitary
troops should have been done. That's what conservatives repeatedly
advocate. And surely with the explosion of seizure laws, in particular
by the Bush administration, if any illegal drugs are found, the mansion
and contents should be taken from the dissembler junkie.

If law enforcement had enough evidence, they would have gotten a search
warrant.

However, if you're asking if I'm for the seizure of property then that would
be a no. Lumping all conservatives into the same basket is as flawed as
saying everybody with blue eyes is a racist.


Yeah and of course, like Limbaugh the dissembler and coward, you don't
respond.

That WAS my response.

Based on this, have you ever thought about what it means? Bush
frequently dismisses the rule of law in support of "stability."


Let's stop beating around the "Bush." If you mean do I think it's okay for
our government to hold Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners, along with American
combatants indefinitely? Yes. Pretending this war is like previous wars is
a fallacy. These "combatants" want to kill civilians. That's just
unacceptable.

Trust me on this one -- you're not helping your side of the argument
here.

Trusting you would make me an idiot.

Nah, you're doing too good a job on your own. Don't blame me.

P-J, like you, I am upset with some of the social policies that the Bush
administration has supported. However, I know he's looking at the realities
of our political landscape. Clinton went to the right to head off moderate
Democrats supporting Republicans. Bush goes to the left to do the opposite.
I don't like it either, but I like it a lot more than the things Bill and
Hillary wanted to do.

Look at the last presidential election -- a skinny electoral majority almost
let Al Gore become our president. Bush needs a larger base, so he can
pursue a conservative agenda. The thing to do is to give Bush a strong
enough majority that he won't have to cowtow to left-wing agendas. Angry
rhetoric coming from the right doesn't do anything but weaken the chances we
have for a more conservative government.

-- Stinger