Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ronald wrote:
I enjoy listening to talk radio shows at night but find my current Radio Shack unit lacking. I live in Malibu, CA and would enjoy listening to talk shows out of New York, Chicago and other cities with great hosts. CC Crane offers the Sangean CCRadio Plus for $165 but before spending this much on an AM radio does anyone have first hand experience with it. Is there any real need to spend $165 for an AM radio. You're likely to be disappointed. At night the trouble is too many stations, not weak signals. 50 watts makes it across the country, but there's a million other watts on the same frequency along the way. A selective radio (=picking out only one channel) eliminates most problems with stations on nearby frequencies (so you're really dealing with 3 million unwanted watts, a million on each side) but you still have the million on the frequency you're tuned to. The CC Crane is fairly selective. For the same price I'd go for a Sony 7600GR (http://www.jandr.com) which at least gives you the ability to pick upper or lower sideband with its synch detection, and gives you as a bonus shortwave as well; it needs a MW loop antenna in the daytime and then it equals the CC Crane. Select-a-tenna or Terk loop, for instance; get the cheap passive models. Daytime MW DXing is much more interesting because then sensitivity really does matter. -- Ron Hardin On the internet, nobody knows you're a jerk. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Ron Hardin wrote: Ronald wrote: I enjoy listening to talk radio shows at night but find my current Radio Shack unit lacking. I live in Malibu, CA and would enjoy listening to talk shows out of New York, Chicago and other cities with great hosts. CC Crane offers the Sangean CCRadio Plus for $165 but before spending this much on an AM radio does anyone have first hand experience with it. Is there any real need to spend $165 for an AM radio. You're likely to be disappointed. At night the trouble is too many stations, not weak signals. 50 watts makes it across the country, but there's a million other watts on the same frequency along the way. A selective radio (=picking out only one channel) eliminates most problems with stations on nearby frequencies (so you're really dealing with 3 million unwanted watts, a million on each side) but you still have the million on the frequency you're tuned to. The CC Crane is fairly selective. For the same price I'd go for a Sony 7600GR (http://www.jandr.com) which at least gives you the ability to pick upper or lower sideband with its synch detection, and gives you as a bonus shortwave as well; it needs a MW loop antenna in the daytime and then it equals the CC Crane. Select-a-tenna or Terk loop, for instance; get the cheap passive models. Daytime MW DXing is much more interesting because then sensitivity really does matter. -- Ron Hardin I agree completely with the last sentence. Late at night, the differences between various AM receivers *shrinks* as compared to daytime (though some are still much better than others, of course), but in midday AM DX, the radios built especially for it, and in conjunction with something like a passive inductive loop (I like the Select-A-Tenna) can give amazing performance over the typical AM/FM radio of today with a 79˘ AM tuner section in it. Tony ----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups ---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =--- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|