Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brenda Ann wrote:
The greatest boundary to bi-coastal AM DX is not geographical at all.. but purposeful. Stations that have high power at night have very directional arrays that protect other stations on the same frequency. Most on the west coast have N-S or similar patterns that keep them from being heard on the east coast. For instance, KOMA (or whatever they are this week) in OKC and KKSN in Portland, OR must protect each other's nighttime coverage. (both are 1520 KHz). An interesting point... I have yet to see a directional array here in the ROK.. and it shows.. at night there are so many stations fighting over any given frequency that it numbs the mind. Most of the winners are Russian and Chinese. I have only ever heard one Japanese MW station here.. After viewing the following (below) FCC webpage, I do get the impression there are fewer class-ND1, 50-KW unlimited, MW stations on the west coast than in the east. Could that mean it's easier for the west coast to hear the east, than vice versa? http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/amq?state...2=&EW=W&size=9 -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|