Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 30th 03, 03:22 AM
Jackie
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have been trying to listen to my "usual" HF spots tonight, but I have
noticed nothing on the HF bands-- where I am listening from, even WWV on 10
MHz is totally shut down by static.

I am watching a DX cluster, http://www.dxer.org/, and I've noticed that most
of the DX spots on the cluster today have been reported on the
otherwise-capricious 6 meter band, due to auroral propagation. If I had a
six meter capable rig, I'd be on it right now. The wavelengths of the lower
VHF frequencies are apparently bouncing off the massive aurorae caused by
the solar storm. I've also noticed numerous spots posted via contacts on
the 2 meter band.

A solar storm of this magnitude right now is really a weird thing, being
that we're just a few years shy of the solar minimum. Just goes to show that
our neighborhood star isn't as predictable as we may have thought. I bet
that I would be able to see wonderful displays of the northern lights where
I am situated, if it weren't for these persistent rainclouds (Minnesota).

Jackie


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 30th 03, 06:03 AM
Mark Keith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jackie" wrote in message news:8u%nb.42165$mZ5.242915@attbi_s54...
I have been trying to listen to my "usual" HF spots tonight, but I have
noticed nothing on the HF bands-- where I am listening from, even WWV on 10
MHz is totally shut down by static.

I am watching a DX cluster, http://www.dxer.org/, and I've noticed that most
of the DX spots on the cluster today have been reported on the
otherwise-capricious 6 meter band, due to auroral propagation. If I had a
six meter capable rig, I'd be on it right now. The wavelengths of the lower
VHF frequencies are apparently bouncing off the massive aurorae caused by
the solar storm. I've also noticed numerous spots posted via contacts on
the 2 meter band.



Weird...I've been checking 6m for the last three days. Been fairly
dead here in Houston. I heard someone early the other morning , and
thats been about it. I roll around checking for beacons every once in
a while, and hear nothing. I'm hoping it will kick in down here sooner
or later. I'm running 100w and a three el NBS yagi. Been pointing it
n-n/e for starters. I've tried calling to see if I can wake anyone up,
but no go. I'm hanging on 50.125 "USB" most of the time as a "monitor"
freq. The beacons are down in the lower end. 50.000 to 50.1. MK
  #3   Report Post  
Old October 31st 03, 04:56 AM
Howard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 29 Oct 2003 22:03:22 -0800, (Mark Keith) wrote:

"Jackie" wrote in message news:8u%nb.42165$mZ5.242915@attbi_s54...
I have been trying to listen to my "usual" HF spots tonight, but I have
noticed nothing on the HF bands-- where I am listening from, even WWV on 10
MHz is totally shut down by static.

I am watching a DX cluster,
http://www.dxer.org/, and I've noticed that most
of the DX spots on the cluster today have been reported on the
otherwise-capricious 6 meter band, due to auroral propagation. If I had a
six meter capable rig, I'd be on it right now. The wavelengths of the lower
VHF frequencies are apparently bouncing off the massive aurorae caused by
the solar storm. I've also noticed numerous spots posted via contacts on
the 2 meter band.



Weird...I've been checking 6m for the last three days. Been fairly
dead here in Houston. I heard someone early the other morning , and
thats been about it. I roll around checking for beacons every once in
a while, and hear nothing. I'm hoping it will kick in down here sooner
or later. I'm running 100w and a three el NBS yagi. Been pointing it
n-n/e for starters. I've tried calling to see if I can wake anyone up,
but no go. I'm hanging on 50.125 "USB" most of the time as a "monitor"
freq. The beacons are down in the lower end. 50.000 to 50.1. MK


6m was open tonight here on the Left Coast. From Southern California
to Arizona, Utah, Montanna, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Perhaps
tomorrow will be better - or at least as good.
  #4   Report Post  
Old October 31st 03, 05:51 AM
Jackie
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Weird...I've been checking 6m for the last three days. Been fairly
dead here in Houston. I heard someone early the other morning , and
thats been about it. I roll around checking for beacons every once in
a while, and hear nothing. I'm hoping it will kick in down here sooner
or later. I'm running 100w and a three el NBS yagi. Been pointing it
n-n/e for starters. I've tried calling to see if I can wake anyone up,
but no go. I'm hanging on 50.125 "USB" most of the time as a "monitor"
freq. The beacons are down in the lower end. 50.000 to 50.1. MK


6m was open tonight here on the Left Coast. From Southern California
to Arizona, Utah, Montanna, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Perhaps
tomorrow will be better - or at least as good.


Just thinking about this a bit... perhaps Houston is too far south to take
advantage of auroral propagation. Fear not, however, as those in the more
southerly areas of the US could get their chance to hear signals bounced off
of the aurorae even where they are.

I don't have a 6 meter rig, but am considering getting one (or at least one
with 6 meters built in) for times such as these. I am only hearing of
increased activity on that band vicariously, through watching DX cluster
spots and now, via Howard. Nice to hear that you're getting some 6 meter
activity from where you are, Howard... let us know if you continue to catch
some good action on 6 in the states, or even further out...

73 de Jackie


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 31st 03, 06:12 AM
starman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jackie wrote:

Just thinking about this a bit... perhaps Houston is too far south to take
advantage of auroral propagation. Fear not, however, as those in the more
southerly areas of the US could get their chance to hear signals bounced off
of the aurorae even where they are.

I don't have a 6 meter rig, but am considering getting one (or at least one
with 6 meters built in) for times such as these. I am only hearing of
increased activity on that band vicariously, through watching DX cluster
spots and now, via Howard. Nice to hear that you're getting some 6 meter
activity from where you are, Howard... let us know if you continue to catch
some good action on 6 in the states, or even further out...

73 de Jackie


Since the auroral height can range from about 50 to 200 miles, there
might be an active area on your northern horizon that can be used for
VHF propagation, even though you might not be seeing any aurora higher
up.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


  #6   Report Post  
Old October 31st 03, 12:02 AM
Chandler7600
 
Posts: n/a
Default

All I can hear at 00:00 Zulu is 6275
(DW, Location unknown) and 5.975 ( BBC, Antigua faint..)
All else is staticy hisss..

s Subject: X11-class flare and major geomagnetic storm 29-X-2003
From: "Jackie"
Date: 10/29/2003 10:22 PM Eastern Standard Time
Message-id: 8u%nb.42165$mZ5.242915@attbi_s54

I have been trying to listen to my "usual" HF spots tonight, but I have
noticed nothing on the HF bands-- where I am listening from, even WWV on 10
MHz is totally shut down by static.

I am watching a DX cluster,
http://www.dxer.org/, and I've noticed that most
of the DX spots on the cluster today have been reported on the
otherwise-capricious 6 meter band, due to auroral propagation. If I had a
six meter capable rig, I'd be on it right now. The wavelengths of the lower
VHF frequencies are apparently bouncing off the massive aurorae caused by
the solar storm. I've also noticed numerous spots posted via contacts on
the 2 meter band.

A solar storm of this magnitude right now is really a weird thing, being
that we're just a few years shy of the solar minimum. Just goes to show that
our neighborhood star isn't as predictable as we may have thought. I bet
that I would be able to see wonderful displays of the northern lights where
I am situated, if it weren't for these persistent rainclouds (Minnesota).

Jackie



  #7   Report Post  
Old October 31st 03, 01:45 AM
Stephen M.H. Lawrence
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I here you, Jackie. I haven't seen blue skies in
days and days, here in Burnsville. Just imagine
the auroral displays we're missing (and nary an
HF signal, to make matters worse).

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, MN


"Jackie" wrote:

| I bet
| that I would be able to see wonderful displays of the northern lights
where
| I am situated, if it weren't for these persistent rainclouds (Minnesota).
|
| Jackie
|
|


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/03


  #8   Report Post  
Old October 31st 03, 05:56 AM
Jackie
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
hlink.net...
I here you, Jackie. I haven't seen blue skies in
days and days, here in Burnsville. Just imagine
the auroral displays we're missing (and nary an
HF signal, to make matters worse).


Oh man, tell me about it. I guess we're finally making up for our extremely
dry summer here. I am both an amateur astronomer and HF fan, and now that
both venues of entertainment are effectively down, I am actually getting to
some projects around the homestead, as well as finishing up books that I
started a couple of months ago. The Sun has conspired to shift my activities
to a small extent. Never mind what the astrologers have to say about such
things. :-)

Jackie


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017