LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 21st 03, 01:44 PM
KLØS
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The ARRL resurrected the FMT last year and had well over a hundred test
reports submitted.

From a technical point of view it remains an interesting challenge in the
actual measurement, the accounting for propagation effects, etc. If you
read the comments from last year's FMT participants you'll find a wide range
of measurement methodologies which led me in several new directions. The
discussion among folks before and after the test was also enjoyable and
informative.

Although propagation here wasn't very good for this year's test it was still
fun and technically challenging -- guess that's the whole idea.

You can see lots more detail at:

http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/fmt/

Dino KLØS/4

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 Radionews Shortwave 0 October 26th 03 08:40 AM
ARNewsline 1356 - Aug 8 2003 Radionews Dx 0 August 12th 03 08:38 AM
ARNewsline 1356 - Aug 8 2003 Radionews Dx 0 August 12th 03 08:38 AM
ARNewsline 1352 - July 11 2003 Radionews Dx 0 July 11th 03 05:26 PM
ARNewsline 1352 - July 11 2003 Radionews Dx 0 July 11th 03 05:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017