Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe see what the owners think of the radios you listed.
See URL: http://www.eham.net/reviews/products/8 I have a Kenwood TS-870 and find it adequate for SWLing as well as Ham work. Some features on the SWL radios not found on Ham transceivers might influence you -- such as synchronous detection, audio response, etc. The eHam reviews will elaborate on why folks chose a particular model. -- 73 From The Wilderness Keyboard ------------------------------- "Bob Bonneville" wrote in message ... I am interested in getting back into SWL (This is what lead me into ham radio back in 1963.) I have narrowed my selection to four receivers over a rather large price difference. My choices were the result of reading many conflicting reviews, along with some bias from my days as a ham. I was hoping that some of you may have owned various combinations of these over the years, that could result in a first hand opinion. The choices I have made are, in no particular order a Drake R8B Icom R8500 Ten Tec RX-350D Icom R75 I was also considering getting back into ham radio (my license is still active and I retire in about 18 months) and would like an opinion as to how the general coverage reception in most of today's ham transcievers compares to the dedicated radios listed above. I started in SWL in 1961 with a Hallicrafters S-120. Later moved to a Lafayette HE-80 when I got the ham license. Then had things like a Drake 2-B, a Hallicrafters SX-117, and finally a Kenwood TS-820S (None of which I have today.) Thanks in advance...... Bob -- wa3cuj |