Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Outsourcing The Corporate CEO & his high paid Staff sounds like a great idea.
In that way, they could employ more people in this country, avoiding the continuous corporate layoffs - which we all have Yet to pay the full price for . . . If you fire someone making $60,000, and he finally gets a job for $20,000 - where does the money come from to pay for schools, road repairs, hospitals, police and Firemen where he lives..? How can said person pay his Mortgage? How can said person consume & spend , the thing that keeps our economy afloat..? & eventualy buy the products from the Company that Laid him off ?? - No one in Corporate America ever thought that one through . . . In article , Doctor Artaud writes: As an earlier post in this thread said, (another damn rhyme), why don't we outsource the corporate and political positions? I'm sure that as with Nike, we could find trustworthy people (hell, big salaries in this country haven't gotten us trustworthy people anyway) to run the companies at a significant savings to the company and would be beneficial to the stockholders. But noooo, they corporate honchos believe that "they alone" account for the profits of the company, even if it involves laying off 2000 people at Christmas, and after accomplishing such dastardly deeds, they are given a $3,500,000 bonus from the company for their accomplishments. Although the $3.5 Million would not pay the 2000 salaries very long (1-2 Months?), it's insulting to reward the CEO for terminating the jobs. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, they have thought it through. They know very well that it will lead to
economic disaster but they will have made their money by that time. As a CEO of a major corporation making several million dollars a year, how many years do you have to work before you get financially independent? After that, it makes no difference to them. Someone once termed this as "bugger your neighbor economics". This is a very appropriate term and is the motto of most of corporate America. Although it is a lousy way to run a business, it must be done or the business can't compete. The real problem is the economic trade deals the government is making. Making deals such as "if you buy 200 thousand worth of goods from us, we will buy 200 billion worth of goods from you is not good policy. In addition, most countries in the industrialized world have import duties high enough that foreign imports are expensive to buy. Not us. When I was a kid, imported goods were expensive. Consequently, the majority of goods were American made. That has changed. "Diverd4777" wrote in message ... - No one in Corporate America ever thought that one through . . . |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|