WOULD THE TERM "WORLD BAND" BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR SHORTWAVE?


In Google Shortwave newsgroup, our colleagues have been debating
the term "World Band" as a kind of communication spectrum as well as
"Shortwave spectrum". It seems that this debate would be an endless
discussion, just like a flame that never dies.
There should be a deliberation or a forum that discuss the
validity of the term "World Band" to substitute "Shortwave" as a kind
of communication spectrum. Only the following like the "Committee on
Radio Frequencies" (CORF) under the National Academy of Sciences,
"Inter-Union Commission on Frequency Allocations for Radio Astronomy
and Space Science (IUCAF) of the International Council of Scientific
Unions and the "Radio communication Sector" of the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU) can discuss and implement to do the
changes officially like "World band" spectrum = "Shortwave" spectrum.
For example the term "kilocycles" was used in old radios before and
was presently changed to "kilohertz" in the honor of "Heinrich Hertz",
the discoverer of electromagnetic waves. This should be the next
agenda for the next "World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC)
meeting. It should be constructive and acceptable to the world
especially by scientists and engineers, not confusion and
misinterpretation. Mostly engineering or scientific books published
around the world, it never mentioned the term "World Band" as a kind
of communication spectrum.
Its only Sony Corporation who introduced the term "World Band"
thru their marketing ads for their radios that has the capability to
receive foreign or international broadcasts around the world. Their
ads mentioned that Sony, a long time world leader in multi-band
receivers, takes you on a boundary-free trip around the world on four
complete bands, requiring no passports, visas or custom checks". In
other words "Sony World Band Receivers – Know No Boundaries".



Andre

HF

On 29 Nov 2003 14:18:59 -0800, (Andre) wrote:

If Nextel can copyright the term "Push to Talk" anything is possible.

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 21:56:46 -0500, "Ken Knapp"
wrote:

If Nextel can copyright the term "Push to Talk" anything is possible.

Hmmm, I always thought it "Release to Listen"

"Andre" wrote in message
om...
WOULD THE TERM "WORLD BAND" BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR SHORTWAVE?


In Google Shortwave newsgroup, our colleagues have been debating
the term "World Band" as a kind of communication spectrum as well as
"Shortwave spectrum". It seems that this debate would be an endless
discussion, just like a flame that never dies.
There should be a deliberation or a forum that discuss the
validity of the term "World Band" to substitute "Shortwave" as a kind
of communication spectrum. Only the following like the "Committee on
Radio Frequencies" (CORF) under the National Academy of Sciences,
"Inter-Union Commission on Frequency Allocations for Radio Astronomy
and Space Science (IUCAF) of the International Council of Scientific
Unions and the "Radio communication Sector" of the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU) can discuss and implement to do the
changes officially like "World band" spectrum = "Shortwave" spectrum.
For example the term "kilocycles" was used in old radios before and
was presently changed to "kilohertz" in the honor of "Heinrich Hertz",
the discoverer of electromagnetic waves. This should be the next
agenda for the next "World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC)
meeting. It should be constructive and acceptable to the world
especially by scientists and engineers, not confusion and
misinterpretation. Mostly engineering or scientific books published
around the world, it never mentioned the term "World Band" as a kind
of communication spectrum.
Its only Sony Corporation who introduced the term "World Band"
thru their marketing ads for their radios that has the capability to
receive foreign or international broadcasts around the world. Their
ads mentioned that Sony, a long time world leader in multi-band
receivers, takes you on a boundary-free trip around the world on four
complete bands, requiring no passports, visas or custom checks". In
other words "Sony World Band Receivers - Know No Boundaries".



Andre

The Great High Priests of Babble such as the Learned euGene the
Dispeptic, Prophet Ralph and Lloyd Haw-Haw only use the term SHORTWAVE
and never WORLDBAND.

I have journied long and far to the Ancient Catalog Archive and
discovered the most amazing literature! The scribes have left a drawing
of the Great and Powerful SubGenius listening to his radio. His radio
cannot be described as WORLDBAND but only as SHORTWAVE. The drawing can
be seen at the alt.binaries.pictures.radio newsgroup.

Lord Magne and his Warriors may be foolish enough challange the Great
High Priests of Babble, but all fear the Wrath of Bob.

Frank Dresser

Andre,

1. Common Broad Cast Bands for Radio Transmissin and Reception:

* Longwave (LW) ~ 150 to 500 kHz

* Medium Wave (AM/MW/BCB) ~ 500 to 1800 kHz

* Shortwave (SW/HF) Bands ~ 1.8 to 30 MHz

* FM Broadcast Band (FM/UHF) ~ 86 to 108 MHz

* VHF and UHF Bands ~ 30 MHz and Beyond...


2. Hence We Say (Common Useage/Expressions):

* AM & FM Radios
= = = AM and FM Band Reception ONLY.

* Shortwave (SW/HF) Radios/Receivers
= = = Shortwave Band Reception ONLY {?}

* General Communications Radios/Receivers
= = = Usually includes the LW, MW and SW Bands.

* WORLD BAND Radios/Receivers
= = = Coverage: MW, SW, and FM; maybe LW and more.

* Wide Band Scanners/Radios/Receivers
= = = Coverage: VHF and UHF Bands and maybe more.


LANGUAGE: Its All About . . .
- Saying It !
- - Writing It !
- - - and Reading It !
To Reach a Common Understanding [ Communications ] .


t4... ~ RHF
= = = Take The Time To... Think About It !
..
..
= = = (Andre)
= = = wrote in message . com...
WOULD THE TERM "WORLD BAND" BE A SUBSTITUTE FOR SHORTWAVE?


In Google Shortwave newsgroup, our colleagues have been debating
the term "World Band" as a kind of communication spectrum as well as
"Shortwave spectrum". It seems that this debate would be an endless
discussion, just like a flame that never dies.
There should be a deliberation or a forum that discuss the
validity of the term "World Band" to substitute "Shortwave" as a kind
of communication spectrum. Only the following like the "Committee on
Radio Frequencies" (CORF) under the National Academy of Sciences,
"Inter-Union Commission on Frequency Allocations for Radio Astronomy
and Space Science (IUCAF) of the International Council of Scientific
Unions and the "Radio communication Sector" of the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU) can discuss and implement to do the
changes officially like "World band" spectrum = "Shortwave" spectrum.
For example the term "kilocycles" was used in old radios before and
was presently changed to "kilohertz" in the honor of "Heinrich Hertz",
the discoverer of electromagnetic waves. This should be the next
agenda for the next "World Administrative Radio Conference (WARC)
meeting. It should be constructive and acceptable to the world
especially by scientists and engineers, not confusion and
misinterpretation. Mostly engineering or scientific books published
around the world, it never mentioned the term "World Band" as a kind
of communication spectrum.
Its only Sony Corporation who introduced the term "World Band"
thru their marketing ads for their radios that has the capability to
receive foreign or international broadcasts around the world. Their
ads mentioned that Sony, a long time world leader in multi-band
receivers, takes you on a boundary-free trip around the world on four
complete bands, requiring no passports, visas or custom checks". In
other words "Sony World Band Receivers ? Know No Boundaries".



Andre