Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian Smith" wrote in message ... "Richard" wrote in message ... http://www.home.earthlink.net/%7Esrw...rundig-100.htm "FM? Whazzat? snipped I found FM performance to be excellent from my old Grundig Satellit 1400 (c.1983). Got many a continental European from up here in Scotland, during Sporadic 'E' lifts in the summer. -- Ian Smith, Renfrew, Scotland. 55.868733°N 4.399517°W, 7m asl Yep. Reading some comments about the Sony ICFM33RDS, and the bit I text I quoted to start the thread, I've somehow got the impression that many modern portable PL sets are "rap" with a capital "C"on FM. Radio Shack DX-397 and the Sony 7600GR quoted as not being that good. Not sure how expensive these radios are, but, the ICFM33RDS is only£35, so maybe poorish FM performance is to be expected for this set. If I pay say £80 or £100 for a PLL radio, maybe FM performance would get to as good as the old Grundig. I don't want the RX to be deaf on FM, or have images from localstations all over the band. I wonder then if I need double conversion on FM.I bet ICFM33RDS is not double. Thats actually just a two band RX. I probably should spend a bit more and go for worldband. I vacillate between worldband and not worldband. :c) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sneaking tiny radios into North Korea | Broadcasting | |||
Comparison of six portable radios | Broadcasting | |||
export cb radios | Policy | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment | |||
stuff for all hams | General |