Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dresser wrote:
You might want to consider radios larger than shirt pocket size. In my expirence, the larger portables are the better performers. Yea true. I've actually got I've got a DX-392, (Roberts RC818) so my focus has been on the shirt/pocket size. And it could be that with pocket-sized radios the chances of getting good FM performance is reduced. Made worse if it's cheap as in cost, like the Sony ICFM33RDS is. One could in theory say then, that generally speaking pocket portables will not have particularly good performance on FM. That is different from saying modern PLL portables generally speaking have not particularly good FM performance. But even if this was true, that PLL portables in general (not pocket) have not good FM performance, it could be price sensitive. And you can probably always find something that does not fit the general case. We are always looking out for these. :c) Or pay the higher price, which may translate to no option but to go for bigger than pocket portable. But, sometimes you really want a pocket portable. I must suss out the right pocket portable in my price range (say up to £80 ($120-ish). Whether I can get good FM performance for this cost I know not yet. If it is true that FM performance is mediocre for modern pocket-sized PLL RX's, then I'll not find what I'm after.Unless I were to find an exception in that price bracket. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sneaking tiny radios into North Korea | Broadcasting | |||
Comparison of six portable radios | Broadcasting | |||
export cb radios | Policy | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment | |||
stuff for all hams | General |