Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pete KE9OA wrote:
I hope I didn't sound too negative in my last reply.............actually the 394 isn't a bad receiver. For those who might be interested, I can redesign the input filters, using a 3 branch chebychev topology. Just shoot me the filter limits that are given in the service manual, and I can do that. It will turn a fair receiver into a very good receiver. I won't charge for this service........there are enough of you out there that can benefit from it! Hi Pete, I'm interested. I have been intending to build an outboard set of filters that would be diode switched under the control of the receiver, just as the internal filters are controlled. Was thinking of doubling the number of filters to narrow the individual passbands for even better protection from overload. Would control this sub-band switching by comparison against the voltage applied to the varactor. As I have never designed and built this sort of thing before, I'd be happy to have your guidance. I'll e-mail you off list with the frequencies. Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ireland, Denmark and Norway leaving shortwave | Shortwave | |||
I wonder... | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | Shortwave | |||
WHERE ARE ALL THE TOUGH GUYS IN THIS SHORTWAVE NEWSGROUP? | General |