Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Diverd4777" wrote in message ... All: Inquired about the kaito KA 105 to Kaito USA http://www.kaitousa.com/KA105.htm asked if it was single IF or double IF Got the reply back: "It is a single IF, but works as a dual conversion radio" - Is this possible? Dan They might meant "Works as well as a dual conversion radio". That's possible, if they're compairng a poor dual conversion radio to a good single conversion one. Dual conversion describes a circuit, not a desirable performance specification such as adjacent channel selectivity, image rejection or signal to noise ratio. Back in the dinosaur radio days, they tried to improve the image rejection of single conversion radios with more high Q RF sections. That worked but it got much more expensive with increasing frequency. Double conversion proved to be the cheaper way. It seems very unlikely an inexpensive single conversion radio will have more selectivity or a better image rejection ratio than an inexpensive double conversion radio. It might have fewer birdies or a lower noise floor, however. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx |