Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Hmmm... there is no dispute that there is indeed global warming. The dispute
arises when the tin-foil hat crowd suggests that it is manmade. The
historical and
geological record bear this out.


Actually, Steve, if you had read the links I provided, you would have seen that
there is a rather significant consensus of both scientists and policy-makers
that man-made greenhouse gases are indeed one of the major contributors to
global warming. This link has been recognized by both Bush's EPA and Dept of
State. GW's objections to Kyoto were not based on indictments of any scientific
linkages, but on the notion that the restrictions on CO2 emissions weren't
applied equally to all nations.

Calling the vast majority of scientists part of "tin foil hat crowd" is a
technique that orininated with Rush Limbaugh. Do you also agree with him that
there are no significant risks we face with the quickly accelerating pace of
extinctions of animal species? If you do, that's your right, but ignoring the
vast consensus of scientists across the planet makes you look a bit tin-foilish
to me.

Can you offer any URLs to support your counter-claims? A comparison of source
qualifications would be VERY interesting.

Well you see, I don't waste my time chasing down links to try and dis-prove
something that is obviously false!

To do so, would be, well, foolish!





With all due respect,

Mike Bryant
Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

From: N8KDV

Well you see, I don't waste my time chasing down links to try and dis-prove
something that is obviously false!

To do so, would be, well, foolish!

Well, Steve, if it's so obviously false, a few questions seem clear:

First, if there was counter-evidence on such a well-publicized issue, you'd
think it would be easy to find. Ever wonder why it can't be found from
reputable non-political sources?

Second, why are the vast majority of scientists and policy-makers supporting
such an obviously false bit of science? Remember, I provided URLs backing up my
claims.

Finally, why do GW Bush's EPA and State Departments recognize a strong link
between man-made greenhouse gases and global warming? Have you ever heard GW
Bush deny the connection? Could you provide any URLs at all? Or is
argumentative support really an unfair request upon anyone branding most of the
rest of the world as members of the "tin-foil hat crowd"?

Sorry to be wasting your time! ;-)

Bryant

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Well you see, I don't waste my time chasing down links to try and dis-prove
something that is obviously false!

To do so, would be, well, foolish!

Well, Steve, if it's so obviously false, a few questions seem clear:

First, if there was counter-evidence on such a well-publicized issue, you'd
think it would be easy to find. Ever wonder why it can't be found from
reputable non-political sources?

Second, why are the vast majority of scientists and policy-makers supporting
such an obviously false bit of science? Remember, I provided URLs backing up my
claims.

Finally, why do GW Bush's EPA and State Departments recognize a strong link
between man-made greenhouse gases and global warming? Have you ever heard GW
Bush deny the connection? Could you provide any URLs at all? Or is
argumentative support really an unfair request upon anyone branding most of the
rest of the world as members of the "tin-foil hat crowd"?

Sorry to be wasting your time! ;-)

No problem, I'm used to you doing that! :-)



Bryant

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Well you see, I don't waste my time chasing down links to try and dis-prove
something that is obviously false!

To do so, would be, well, foolish!

Well, Steve, if it's so obviously false, a few questions seem clear:

First, if there was counter-evidence on such a well-publicized issue, you'd
think it would be easy to find. Ever wonder why it can't be found from
reputable non-political sources?

Second, why are the vast majority of scientists and policy-makers supporting
such an obviously false bit of science? Remember, I provided URLs backing up my
claims.

Finally, why do GW Bush's EPA and State Departments recognize a strong link
between man-made greenhouse gases and global warming? Have you ever heard GW
Bush deny the connection? Could you provide any URLs at all? Or is
argumentative support really an unfair request upon anyone branding most of the
rest of the world

Most of the rest of the world? That in and of itself is a tin-foil hat statement if
I ever heard one... LOL

You really think that 'most of the rest of the world' supports your way of
thinking? Thanks for the great laugh to get my day started!

as members of the "tin-foil hat crowd"?

Sorry to be wasting your time! ;-)

Bryant

From: N8KDV


You really think that 'most of the rest of the world' supports your way of
thinking? Thanks for the great laugh to get my day started!

I already provided the URL showing that over 90% of scientists across the world
support the linkage between man-made greenhouse gases. I guess actually reading
is far too great a waste of your time.

The following link:

http://unfccc.int/resource/convkp.html

shows that the vast majority of governmental policy-makers across the planet
believe that's there's enough evidence to support attempts to scale-back
greenhouse emissions.

Let's see, that's still zero support for YOUR obvious common sense
counter-positions, right?

Again, I ask: Why Does The EPA and State Dept under Bush recognize the linkage?
Why has Bush never denied the connection? Does GW Bush not have the pipeline to
obvious truth that God has provided Steve Lare?

Having a bad day, Steve?

Mike

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV


You really think that 'most of the rest of the world' supports your way of
thinking? Thanks for the great laugh to get my day started!

I already provided the URL showing that over 90% of scientists across the world
support the linkage between man-made greenhouse gases. I guess actually reading
is far too great a waste of your time.

The following link:

http://unfccc.int/resource/convkp.html

shows that the vast majority of governmental policy-makers across the planet
believe that's there's enough evidence to support attempts to scale-back
greenhouse emissions.

Let's see, that's still zero support for YOUR obvious common sense
counter-positions, right?

Again, I ask: Why Does The EPA and State Dept under Bush recognize the linkage?
Why has Bush never denied the connection? Does GW Bush not have the pipeline to
obvious truth that God has provided Steve Lare?

Having a bad day, Steve?

No, but apparently you are! Even though it's your Birthday and MLK day to boot!

I rarely have a bad day. If it sucks to be you, so be it! When it sucks to be me,
then I'll worry!



Mike

From: N8KDV

Having a bad day, Steve?

No, but apparently you are! Even though it's your Birthday and MLK day to
boot!

I rarely have a bad day. If it sucks to be you, so be it! When it sucks to be
me,
then I'll worry!


Well, I'm pretty happy to be me. Happy enough to enjoy showing folks that even
Master Centurion DXers don't really grasp non-radio issues that well.

Ten posts from you and none of them saying anything of substance or offering a
bit of counter-support. Thank goodness that most conservative commentators put
a little more energy into their efforts. ;-)

Bryant

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: N8KDV

Having a bad day, Steve?

No, but apparently you are! Even though it's your Birthday and MLK day to
boot!

I rarely have a bad day. If it sucks to be you, so be it! When it sucks to be
me,
then I'll worry!


Well, I'm pretty happy to be me. Happy enough to enjoy showing folks that even
Master Centurion DXers don't really grasp non-radio issues that well.

LOL... methinks you have a highly inflted opinion of yourself!
You're making gross assumtions again, much like you are making about global
warming!
I have a good grasp of many, many non-radio related issues.
I just don't have a grasp on tin-foil hat thinking! I'll leave that to you, a
non-Master DX Centurian.

I earned mine! so I flaunt it!



Ten posts from you and none of them saying anything of substance or offering a
bit of counter-support. Thank goodness that most conservative commentators put
a little more energy into their efforts. ;-)

Yes, they do. You finally noticed that I'm not a conservative commentator, that's
progress on your part!



Bryant