Michael Bryant wrote:

From: "CW"

And, of course, they will offer no proof. Just supposition the way they
always have.
Brother stair has been predicting the end of the world. Do you believe that
too?

CW,

If you really believe that global warming climate research is on par with one
of Brother Stair's predictions you are ignoring the consensus of world
scientists and the quiet admissions of your own right-wing administration:

Consensus of world scientists support global warming

http://www.law.pace.edu/env/energy/globalwarming.html

Bush administration efforts recognize global warming

http://www.globalchange.gov/

Global warming: Early warning signs

http://www.climatehotmap.org/

Bush's EPA fact page on climate research
http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwa...t/Climate.html

Bush's State Dept: Co2 Control Helps Economy

http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwa...ceCenterPublic
ationsUSClimateActionReport.html

Most people would opt to be, at least, precautious. You really should stop
basing your scientific conclusions on the babbling of right-wing AM talk show
hosts. (Just to make this OT! ;-)

I had a debate team win a national championship suggesting that using the
marketplace to trade emission allottments would spur conservation and spur the
economy.

What does that prove? That a bunch of other academic tin-foil hat wearers liked
your story? Come on...

It would in no way spur conservation, nor would it spur the economy (especially
not ours). All it would do is facilitate the trading of another 'commodity', with
the attendant money to be made by doing so.

Tin-foil hat thinking indeed!

The evidence is strong. Please list your counter-URLs so we can
compare the quality of opposing evidentiary sources.

I have 1000s more URLs if you're interested...


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)