![]() |
"RedOctober90" wrote in message om... The reason for the ban on domestic broadcasting in the United States is that the feds tend to be afraid of the attributes of shortwave and the ability to transmit across an entire nation. They want Clear Channel to own all the domestic broadcasters so they can broadcast what they "approve of" The ban on domestic shortwave dates back to the 30's, and was based on the FCC belief that the country was best served by the 1-A and 1-B clear channel stations (you are right... it has to do with clear channels) and that domestic short wave was not needed and would be an impediment to the growth of the clear channel service. |
That's crap and you know it. Some are already suspecting that you're an
idiot. I would think you would try not to prove them right. "RedOctober90" wrote in message om... The reason for the ban on domestic broadcasting in the United States is that the feds tend to be afraid of the attributes of shortwave and the ability to transmit across an entire nation. They want Clear Channel to own all the domestic broadcasters so they can broadcast what they "approve of" Even though WBCQ isn't transmitting "domestically," it's still mostly listened to by people in the US. |
"RedOctober90" wrote in message om... The reason for the ban on domestic broadcasting in the United States is that the feds tend to be afraid of the attributes of shortwave and the ability to transmit across an entire nation. They want Clear Channel to own all the domestic broadcasters so they can broadcast what they "approve of" That's interesting. I figured neither the FCC nor Clear Channel had much interest in shortwave. As far as I know, the FCC isn't doing anything about SW programming content. And Clear Channel hasn't started up any of the SW stations. Even though WBCQ isn't transmitting "domestically," it's still mostly listened to by people in the US. That makes sense. Frank Dresser |
JW,
While GM could promote its Cars and Trucks "Nation Wide" on 'one' Single Powerful Shortwave Station. (NOTE: It does not.) GM does promote its Cars and Trucks "Nation Wide" on hundreds of 'local' AM/FM Stations. Plus 'local' GM Dealers also use local AM/FM Stations to promote GM Cars and Trucks. The current AM/FM/TV Station Broadcast Model helps to build local business and churn more money within the local economy. All Politics are Local and our US Representatives and US Senators plus our State and Local Elected Representatives are interested in a thriving "Local Economy." The FCC Does What Congress Permits. The National Economy is actual Hundreds of Regional Economies make up of Hundreds of 'local' Economies. WHATS GOOD FOR BUSINESS IS GOOD FOR AM/FM/TV BROADCASTING IN THE USA [.] Non-Domestic [Nation Wide] Shortwave Broadcasting 'exists' to fill a limited business (social) need. If the FCC did not WANT (allow) [Nation Wide] Non-Domestic Shortwave Broadcasting then Dr Gene Scott and many others would be off the air. With the Advent of Domestic XM and Sirius 'direct' Satellite Radio Broadcasting; over time more domestic "Nation Wide" Broadcasting will develop for that media. TBL: Non-Domestic [Nation Wide] Shortwave Broadcasting in Ten (10) to Fifty (50) Years will be what it is Today a Business Operating within its Limited Market. ~ RHF .. .. = = = "Jeff Wilson" = = = wrote in message . com... What do yout hink is the future of shortwave and amateur radio in 10, 50, 100 years? Honestly, it's not as necessary as it used to be, but the ARRL is right, "When all else fails" shortwave and amateur radio will be there. I think 3-30mhz is of limited use to corporations and other powerful interests. It's just not very attractive to them, and the regulatory bodies around the world respect it. So I think it's here to stay for a good long time. But the question is, in 100 years, who's going to use it? Will it be a vacant frequency spread? I sure hope not. It's a great hobby. Yet, I can't help but feel that the glory days of shortwave listening has passed me by. Thoughts? ------------- Jeff Wilson KG6RIF Los Angeles, California |
To the liberal left it sounds like crap, since they promote
censorship, and have no concept of free airwaves. You sound like a troll, calling me an "idiot" What have I written here that is wrong? It is true that the feds are afraid of someone using shortwave to spread beyond-the-fringe politics to a mass audience around the country. And also, they want Clear Channel to run American airwaves and only promote "governmentally approved" politics. "CW" wrote in message ... That's crap and you know it. Some are already suspecting that you're an idiot. I would think you would try not to prove them right. "RedOctober90" wrote in message om... The reason for the ban on domestic broadcasting in the United States is that the feds tend to be afraid of the attributes of shortwave and the ability to transmit across an entire nation. They want Clear Channel to own all the domestic broadcasters so they can broadcast what they "approve of" Even though WBCQ isn't transmitting "domestically," it's still mostly listened to by people in the US. |
There you go again, proving your idiocy.
"RedOctober90" wrote in message om... To the liberal left it sounds like crap, since they promote censorship, and have no concept of free airwaves. You sound like a troll, calling me an "idiot" What have I written here that is wrong? It is true that the feds are afraid of someone using shortwave to spread beyond-the-fringe politics to a mass audience around the country. And also, they want Clear Channel to run American airwaves and only promote "governmentally approved" politics. "CW" wrote in message ... That's crap and you know it. Some are already suspecting that you're an idiot. I would think you would try not to prove them right. "RedOctober90" wrote in message om... The reason for the ban on domestic broadcasting in the United States is that the feds tend to be afraid of the attributes of shortwave and the ability to transmit across an entire nation. They want Clear Channel to own all the domestic broadcasters so they can broadcast what they "approve of" Even though WBCQ isn't transmitting "domestically," it's still mostly listened to by people in the US. |
"RHF" wrote in message om... JW, While GM could promote its Cars and Trucks "Nation Wide" on 'one' Single Powerful Shortwave Station. (NOTE: It does not.) GM does promote its Cars and Trucks "Nation Wide" on hundreds of 'local' AM/FM Stations. Plus 'local' GM Dealers also use local AM/FM Stations to promote GM Cars and Trucks. The current AM/FM/TV Station Broadcast Model helps to build local business and churn more money within the local economy. All Politics are Local and our US Representatives and US Senators plus our State and Local Elected Representatives are interested in a thriving "Local Economy." The FCC Does What Congress Permits. The National Economy is actual Hundreds of Regional Economies make up of Hundreds of 'local' Economies. WHATS GOOD FOR BUSINESS IS GOOD FOR AM/FM/TV BROADCASTING IN THE USA [.] Non-Domestic [Nation Wide] Shortwave Broadcasting 'exists' to fill a limited business (social) need. If the FCC did not WANT (allow) [Nation Wide] Non-Domestic Shortwave Broadcasting then Dr Gene Scott and many others would be off the air. With the Advent of Domestic XM and Sirius 'direct' Satellite Radio Broadcasting; over time more domestic "Nation Wide" Broadcasting will develop for that media. TBL: Non-Domestic [Nation Wide] Shortwave Broadcasting in Ten (10) to Fifty (50) Years will be what it is Today a Business Operating within its Limited Market. ~ RHF . GM promotes it's cars nationwide on nationwide TV programming. Car ads on radio are usually sponsored by a dealer or a dealer's association. There isn't much nationwide programming on radio anymore. When there was, there was also nationwide radio advertising. I don't see how much of this resulted from any deliberate government policy. Frank Dresser |
"RedOctober90" wrote in message om... To the liberal left it sounds like crap, since they promote censorship, and have no concept of free airwaves. You sound like a troll, calling me an "idiot" What have I written here that is wrong? It is true that the feds are afraid of someone using shortwave to spread beyond-the-fringe politics to a mass audience around the country. What's the evidence of that? And also, they want Clear Channel to run American airwaves and only promote "governmentally approved" politics. Will the government force NPR to sell out to Clear Channel? Frank Dresser |
He has no evidence. It is a product of his mind. It has always been
government policy to prevent any one, or only a few, entities from controlling the majority of the media. That includes newspapers, TV and radio. The reason for that was to ensure variety of opinion. We had a case here locally a year of so ago where, one of the two largest newspapers in the area wanted to buy the other. They had to get government permission to do so. They were denied. If it had been two bicycle factories, the government would have no say about it. The deregulation and buy up of radio stations is due to greed helped along by a president (passed) that had the motto "Morals? We don't need no stinkin' morals". "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "RedOctober90" wrote in message om... To the liberal left it sounds like crap, since they promote censorship, and have no concept of free airwaves. You sound like a troll, calling me an "idiot" What have I written here that is wrong? It is true that the feds are afraid of someone using shortwave to spread beyond-the-fringe politics to a mass audience around the country. What's the evidence of that? And also, they want Clear Channel to run American airwaves and only promote "governmentally approved" politics. Will the government force NPR to sell out to Clear Channel? Frank Dresser |
But of course... your one of those "government is so nice and does
everything in the favor of the people.. awwwwwwww" Wake up. The government would never allow a WBCQ type station to get on regualr AM/FM radio, this is why you only find these silly neo-con "buy my book buy my tape type" You have some of these neo-cons who one day say "Bush is god" then another day "Bush sucks" These guys aren't really doing anything but spewing crap. But.. this is acceptable by the government. Anyone talking the realities would be quickly called a racist and booted off the air. "CW" wrote in message ... There you go again, proving your idiocy. "RedOctober90" wrote in message om... To the liberal left it sounds like crap, since they promote censorship, and have no concept of free airwaves. You sound like a troll, calling me an "idiot" What have I written here that is wrong? It is true that the feds are afraid of someone using shortwave to spread beyond-the-fringe politics to a mass audience around the country. And also, they want Clear Channel to run American airwaves and only promote "governmentally approved" politics. "CW" wrote in message ... That's crap and you know it. Some are already suspecting that you're an idiot. I would think you would try not to prove them right. "RedOctober90" wrote in message om... The reason for the ban on domestic broadcasting in the United States is that the feds tend to be afraid of the attributes of shortwave and the ability to transmit across an entire nation. They want Clear Channel to own all the domestic broadcasters so they can broadcast what they "approve of" Even though WBCQ isn't transmitting "domestically," it's still mostly listened to by people in the US. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com