Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm also thinking that without a noise-bridge, my best bet is a trial and error comparison. Joe Carr sez that at less than 1 wavelength, large loops can reach a feedpoint impedance of up to 3000 ohms (I had to read it twice to make sure); but at a full wavelength or longer, it pretty much stays at around 100 ohms. Various sources show anywhere from no match needed, all the way up to a 30:1 match is needed. I think there's just too many variables to know for sure. So, trial and error it is. I'm going to try a 30:1, a 10:1 and a 1:1 toroid xformer to see what differences, if any, I can detect just with the naked "earball". In the absence of any discernable difference, I'm going to at least use the 1:1, if only to maintain the DC seperation between the antenna element and the coax. In addition to the end Z varying radically with frequency, you will also find the classic 9:1 toroidal transformer only functions as a 9:1 over a relatively narrow frequency range- whereas a binocular core will behave as a 9:1 over almost 2 decades. Somewhere here I have a network analyzer plot comparing a toroidal vs binocular transformer. -- Dale W4OP for PAR Electronics, Inc. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna impedance analyzer comparison | Antenna | |||
TV antenna impedance measurements with MFJ-269. | Antenna | |||
NEW PROGRAM - Input Impedance & SWR of resonant antenna. | Homebrew | |||
NEW PROGRAM - Input Impedance & SWR of resonant antenna. | Homebrew |