longwave wrote:

Stinger wrote:

Yeah, I guess you have to drive through Yale and Harvard with your windows
rolled up, so they don't throw diplomas in.

I guess you don't read much yourself. Here's some material for you.

http://www.yaledailynews.com/article.asp?AID=2636
http://aad.english.ucsb.edu/docs/bushstyle19.html
http://www.jsonline.com/news/metro/jan03/112130.asp
http://www.commondreams.org/views01/0620-01.htm

He passed! What's your point?

Do you have any kind of degree? Any advanced degrees?

It doesn't take a genius to be President, only someone who knows right from wrong.
George fits the bill!



"longwave" wrote in message
...
Michael Bryant wrote:

From: helmsman

If you can't gather more information faster than reading a newspaper
there is a problem. On top of the fact that "print doesn't have to be
a newspaper". I have always gotten better and more diversified news
from shortwave (since 1951) or the net.


Actually, the info in newspapers is usually more in-depth than that
heard on
most broadcasters. The best thing is to read several diferent newspapers
each
day.

And what does it say about a President if he neither reads newspapers or
listens to radio? King Bush, the first, was a SWLer, but I've never
heard of
Bush II listening.

It explains why GW knew so little about the world until he got a crash
course in everything after being elected. He's got to be one of the
least intelligent presidents in US history. Everyone on his staff is
smarter than him and they know it. That's why it's easy for them to
manipulate him.

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----