Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith wrote:
Broadband over Power Lines has been approved for a NPRM by the full 5 commissioners of the FCC. What this means for all short wave listeners is that once BPL is deployed a SWL is not protected by any interference caused by BPL transmissions. SWL's use part 15 devices and most accept any interference. If BPL interfered with local Radio or TV broadcast then the licensee of those stations could complain, however I doubt if any SWL in America will be able to get a international broadcaster to complain to a utility company about BPL interference. Basically this could lead to the death of shortwave listening and ham radio is equally threatened. Ham radio and CB operators will face irate neighbors who have their BPL Internet connection interfered with by transmissions. I can easily see enraged neighbors calling their congress person complaining about the 'CBer' wiping out all the Internet connections in their neighborhoods and congress quickly passing a law placing the burden on the Ham Radio and CB Operator not to interfere with Internet BPL. The FCC has allowed the beginning of the end of HF operation by allowing BPL to use HF frequencies. Keith wrote: Broadband over Power Lines has been approved for a NPRM by the full 5 commissioners of the FCC. What this means for all short wave listeners is that once BPL is deployed a SWL is not protected by any interference caused by BPL transmissions. SWL's use part 15 devices and most accept any interference. If BPL interfered with local Radio or TV broadcast then the licensee of those stations could complain, however I doubt if any SWL in America will be able to get a international broadcaster to complain to a utility company about BPL interference. Basically this could lead to the death of shortwave listening and ham radio is equally threatened. Ham radio and CB operators will face irate neighbors who have their BPL Internet connection interfered with by transmissions. I can easily see enraged neighbors calling their congress person complaining about the 'CBer' wiping out all the Internet connections in their neighborhoods and congress quickly passing a law placing the burden on the Ham Radio and CB Operator not to interfere with Internet BPL. The FCC has allowed the beginning of the end of HF operation by allowing BPL to use HF frequencies. The FCC is apparently only concerned about BPL interference to "licensed spectrum users" in the US. Since foreign broadcasters are not licensed in the US, they may have no recourse with BPL interference to their US shortwave listeners. It's also not clear if we as SWL's have any say in the matter. The amateur radio community has more influence because they are US licensed spectrum users. However that only protects their assigned bands. We've already seen how the FCC encouraged the CODAR stations to use the portion of the 60-m band which is dominated by foreign broadcasters, mostly in the tropics. They did this because SWL's don't have a lobby in Washington. I hope more of us will start sending emails to the FCC about this potentially serious problem for the SWL community. http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-243879A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-243879A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-243879A3.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-243879A4.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-243879A5.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-243879A6.pdf -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BPL NPRM v. NOI | Policy | |||
AMATEUR RADIO ENTHUSIASTS COME OUT SWINGING IN OPPOSITION TO NPRM ON BPL | Policy | |||
Access BPL NPRM versus NOI | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM Approved | Policy | |||
BPL NPRM | Policy |