Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... It is a common error to assume that digital communications are similar to analog RF. One reason is very fast edge times are required to create the most eye margin possible at the decoding end of a data stream so the bandwidth required is much greater. A good rule of thumb is 3.7 times the clock rate as a minimum. Usually the engineering shoots for the fastest edge times practical. Well, I thought we started out with harmonics of the BPL carriers. I don't see why there would have to be BPL harmonics due to the digital modulation anymore than a RTTY transmission would have to have harmonics. If you're saying the sidebands of carriers will be spaced as far as 3.7 times as far as the data clock rate, sure, why not? I don't know any of the specifics. But if the BPL carriers stop at 80 Mhz, I suppose the total spectrum won't go much past 80 Mhz.. An one/zero pattern and multiples thereof are square waves but I should not have used that term because it looks like I just threw you off the path of understanding. -- Telamon Ventura, California That's the rocky path of understanding, for ya. Can't even take take my shoes off when I need to count past 10. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
IBOC -- a way to jam skywave signals from Mexico and Canada at night, just like the USSR did with VOA, RFE/RL, ... | Broadcasting | |||
The "Radio Crazy" Well-earned demise of AM IBOC. | Broadcasting | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
The AM IBOC mess is yet to begin... | Broadcasting | |||
Here comes IBOC | Shortwave |