|
Alex Jones
I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00
CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo |
Frank Minutillo wrote: I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo I looked at WWCR's schedule and I don't see him listed there. Perhaps I missed something though. http://www.wwcr.com/wwcr_program/wwc...uide_text.html |
N8KDV wrote: Frank Minutillo wrote: I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo I looked at WWCR's schedule and I don't see him listed there. Perhaps I missed something though. http://www.wwcr.com/wwcr_program/wwc...uide_text.html Apparently he is on WWRB http://www.wwrb.org/ |
In article fhk2c.36449$Ri6.5230@lakeread04,
says... I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo If you miss him consistantly, it may mean the sights on your rifle/pistol are off... ^_^ FW |
I missed him too. Had to go to his website to hear him on a RA stream...
"Frank Minutillo" wrote in message news:fhk2c.36449$Ri6.5230@lakeread04... I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo |
"Frank Minutillo" wrote in message news:fhk2c.36449$Ri6.5230@lakeread04... I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo His act is to act crazy and sell videotapes to suckers. He's in the same league as scam artists that sell gold coins as a hedge against an economic meltdown. He'll also be the special guest for THREE HOURS on Coast to Coast AM with George Noorey on either Wednesday or Thursday of next week. www.coasttocoastam.com Should be good for a few laughs I'd guess. : ) |
"Frank Minutillo" wrote in message news:fhk2c.36449$Ri6.5230@lakeread04... I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo He's been on daytimes 11AM-1PM Central on WWCR 9.475. Frank Dresser |
"Da Green Hornet" wrote in message groups.com... "Frank Minutillo" wrote in message news:fhk2c.36449$Ri6.5230@lakeread04... I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo His act is to act crazy and sell videotapes to suckers. He's in the same league as scam artists that sell gold coins as a hedge against an economic meltdown. He'll also be the special guest for THREE HOURS on Coast to Coast AM with George Noorey on either Wednesday or Thursday of next week. www.coasttocoastam.com Should be good for a few laughs I'd guess. : ) I get a chuckle out of Jones on his own program, but when he crosses over to "legitimate" (or at least semi-legitimate) media, it annoys me. Noorey needs to stick to canals on Mars, ghostly apparitions, remote viewers, and weird viruses; he is way too credulous on political topics to donate three hours of a pretty highly rated program to Jones. |
"T. Early" wrote in message ...
"Da Green Hornet" wrote in message groups.com... I get a chuckle out of Jones on his own program, but when he crosses over to "legitimate" (or at least semi-legitimate) media, it annoys me. Noorey needs to stick to canals on Mars, ghostly apparitions, remote viewers, and weird viruses; he is way too credulous on political topics to donate three hours of a pretty highly rated program to Jones. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I get a chuckle (not really) out of self appointed censors like you who wish to determine what millions of others should, or should not, be allowed to listen to. A paltry three hours of alternative views out of the tens of thousands of hours the "mainstream" political pundits receive from the media isn't enough. People often speak of the need for a "third party" in national politics. I'd settle for having a second party in the country! The Repulican/Democrat, left/right ruse has been going on forever and Alex Jones is working diligently to expose the con game. He is deserving of a forum outside the limited audience of shortwave radio to do so. Mack |
"Mack Sambo" wrote in message om... "T. Early" wrote in message ... "Da Green Hornet" wrote in message groups.com... I get a chuckle out of Jones on his own program, but when he crosses over to "legitimate" (or at least semi-legitimate) media, it annoys me. Noorey needs to stick to canals on Mars, ghostly apparitions, remote viewers, and weird viruses; he is way too credulous on political topics to donate three hours of a pretty highly rated program to Jones. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++ I get a chuckle (not really) out of self appointed censors like you who wish to determine what millions of others should, or should not, be allowed to listen to. A paltry three hours of alternative views out of the tens of thousands of hours the "mainstream" political pundits receive from the media isn't enough. People often speak of the need for a "third party" in national politics. I'd settle for having a second party in the country! The Repulican/Democrat, left/right ruse has been going on forever and Alex Jones is working diligently to expose the con game. He is deserving of a forum outside the limited audience of shortwave radio to do so. Mack Let's have a brief intelligence (or in the case of a Jones, non-intelligence) test. Show me anywhere in my previous post where I suggested "censoring" Jones. My main regret, which may require some degree of reading comprehension to follow, is that Noorey is not up to the task of exposing Jones' absurd fallacies for what they are. I'm guessing you aren't either. |
"T. Early" wrote in message ...
"Mack Sambo" wrote in message om... "T. Early" wrote in message ... "Da Green Hornet" wrote in message groups.com... I get a chuckle out of Jones on his own program, but when he crosses over to "legitimate" (or at least semi-legitimate) media, it annoys me. Noorey needs to stick to canals on Mars, ghostly apparitions, remote viewers, and weird viruses; he is way too credulous on political topics to donate three hours of a pretty highly rated program to Jones. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++ I get a chuckle (not really) out of self appointed censors like you who wish to determine what millions of others should, or should not, be allowed to listen to. A paltry three hours of alternative views out of the tens of thousands of hours the "mainstream" political pundits receive from the media isn't enough. People often speak of the need for a "third party" in national politics. I'd settle for having a second party in the country! The Repulican/Democrat, left/right ruse has been going on forever and Alex Jones is working diligently to expose the con game. He is deserving of a forum outside the limited audience of shortwave radio to do so. Mack Let's have a brief intelligence (or in the case of a Jones, non-intelligence) test. Show me anywhere in my previous post where I suggested "censoring" Jones. My main regret, which may require some degree of reading comprehension to follow, is that Noorey is not up to the task of exposing Jones' absurd fallacies for what they are. I'm guessing you aren't either. I used to enjoy "The Power Hour" with Joyce Riley and Dave Von Kliest. Then right after 9/11, they seemed to go off the deep end. I mean, its probably legitimate to question whether the US was somehow involved in the terrorist attacks. I personally believe that to be an absurd position, but by all means, lets study the FACTS, not the theories, and let the chips fall where they may. But Good Lord, they just go on and on and on about it until you want to call them up and scream at them "Will you PLEASE just give it a rest??" I actually stopped listening to them for about a six month stretch, then one morning I decided to tune in to see if they had put their crackpot 9/11 theories behind them. Within the first segment of the show, I discovered that they had not. They seem like nice enough folks,though, and I get the impression that their concern for Gulf War vets is genuine and laudable. But the only reason I find to listen to their program is that they usually have some very informative guests. The rest of the program - from Dave's corny music, lame jokes, and horrible impressions; and Joyce's contant "ooooh"ing and forced chuckling at Dave's moronic antics, to their bratty show-ending signature "We-Will-Not-STOP!!" - is juat a tedious strain on my nerves. MB |
"Gray Shockley" wrote in message .com... Using that freq which you gave the other day, I picked him up yesterday (Friday). His drooling has gotten worse. /gray/ The price of Big Berkey drool filters must have gone up. Frank Dresser |
"T. Early" wrote in message ... I get a chuckle out of Jones on his own program, but when he crosses over to "legitimate" (or at least semi-legitimate) media, it annoys me. Noorey needs to stick to canals on Mars, ghostly apparitions, remote viewers, and weird viruses; he is way too credulous on political topics to donate three hours of a pretty highly rated program to Jones. I've heard Art Bell was doing a alot of the black helicopter/government conspiracy stories before the Oklahoma City bombing. So, Alex Jones isn't totally out of character for the show. I think the host of Coast to Coast must be credulous for the show to work. It's the host's job to get the guest to share his special knowledge. It won't take the skill of an Art Bell to get Alex Jones talking. It's the Coast to Coast listener's job to seperate reality from nonsense and Alex Jones has plenty to offer. Frank Dresser |
"Mack Sambo" wrote in message
om... "T. Early" wrote in message ... I get a chuckle out of Jones on his own program, but when he crosses over to "legitimate" (or at least semi-legitimate) media, it annoys me. Noorey needs to stick to canals on Mars, ghostly apparitions, remote viewers, and weird viruses; he is way too credulous on political topics to donate three hours of a pretty highly rated program to Jones. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I get a chuckle (not really) out of self appointed censors like you who wish to determine what millions of others should, or should not, be allowed to listen to. A paltry three hours of alternative views out of the tens of thousands of hours the "mainstream" political pundits receive from the media isn't enough. No, I agree it should be more. Alex should have 4 hours with Snorey to make a fool of himself. I for one am looking forward to taping this show for my playback the next day. Should be a real hoot if you ask me! The short-wave videotape salesman of whackjob conspiracy theories to trailer park dwelling white trash....meets the moderator of the Face on Mars, tinfoil-hat wearing, UFoologists and star trek geeks who can stay up late cause they are all unemployable kooks. WHAT A NIGHT ON AM RADIO THIS WILL BE ! woo-hoooo! People often speak of the need for a "third party" in national politics. I'd settle for having a second party in the country! Sure...2nd/3rd party...enough suckers fell for that line of ultra virgin monkeyshi+ in 2000 when Ralph Nader was on the ballot and the idiot voters in Florida frigged us up the proverbial wazoo for the next 4 years with a GW Bush Presidency. Smooth move Ex-Lax! The Republican/Democrat, left/right ruse has been going on forever and Alex Jones is working diligently to expose the con game. He is deserving of a forum outside the limited audience of short-wave radio to do so. OK we'll give him one night to make a complete ass out of himself on mainstream late night radio. After that however, he goes straight back to shortwave "Paytriot Acres Trailer Park" out on the other side of town to placate the losers who listen to his right wing short-wave crapola with a beer in one hand and a part of their anatomy in the other... PFHBLTTT!! Mack PLONK! |
"T. Early" wrote in message ...
Let's have a brief intelligence (or in the case of a Jones, non-intelligence) test. Show me anywhere in my previous post where I suggested "censoring" Jones. My main regret, which may require some degree of reading comprehension to follow, is that Noorey is not up to the task of exposing Jones' absurd fallacies for what they are. I'm guessing you aren't either. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Your wish to censor Alex Jones is implicit in the post, your "regret" that he is appearing on a show with such a large listening audience reveals that. Your supposition that it is George Norry's responsibility to "expose" Jones indicates a lack of understanding regarding the genre of the show, it's not CNN's Crossfire or NBC's Hardball. Also, the audience can call in and engage Jones directly if they so desire. If you were intellectually honest you would admit that you would relish the opportunity to censor Alex Jones. Your assumption that the listeners aren't able to determine the validity of what Jones says, what is true or not true, also betrays an arrogance all too common amongst people such as yourself. Mack |
"Mack Sambo" wrote in message om... "T. Early" wrote in message ... Let's have a brief intelligence (or in the case of a Jones, non-intelligence) test. Show me anywhere in my previous post where I suggested "censoring" Jones. My main regret, which may require some degree of reading comprehension to follow, is that Noorey is not up to the task of exposing Jones' absurd fallacies for what they are. I'm guessing you aren't either. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++ Your wish to censor Alex Jones is implicit in the post, your "regret" that he is appearing on a show with such a large listening audience reveals that. Your supposition that it is George Norry's responsibility to "expose" Jones indicates a lack of understanding regarding the genre of the show, it's not CNN's Crossfire or NBC's Hardball. Also, the audience can call in and engage Jones directly if they so desire. If you were intellectually honest you would admit that you would relish the opportunity to censor Alex Jones. Your assumption that the listeners aren't able to determine the validity of what Jones says, what is true or not true, also betrays an arrogance all too common amongst people such as yourself. Mack Let's see if I'm too "arrogant" to follow your line of reasoning. After admitting that I listen to Jones on SW, I express concern (regret, if you want) that Jones is getting three hours on Coast to Coast because I question Noorey's ability to appropriately question Jones on some of his political fantasies. This, in your mind, equates to advocating censoring Jones, which I did not. When asked directly where I advocating censoring him, you say it's "implied." In other words, I didn't say it, but we'll pretend that wishing Jones would appear in a different forum with a better interviewer equates to calling for censorship (i.e., taking him off the air). Having put words in my mouth, and trying to pass that off as "implied," you now suggest that *I'm* intellectually dishonest and jump back on the censorship horse. So let's resolve that once and for all--I'd like nothing better than to see Jones get as much personal coverage as possible by seasoned interviewers who don't have Noorey's penchant for tossing softballs. Noorey is a decent guy with a good show within it's realm, but wouldn't it be great to hear Jones explaining the "Secrets of the Bohemian Grove" to Mike Wallace? It also strikes me as rather strange that you consider it "arrogant" to desire that Jones be interviewed by someone with sufficient knowledge of politics to put his "ideas" to the test, rather than someone whose idea of a credible source is Richard C. Hoagland. Still, you don't have to be arrogant to recognize that for anyone who regards Jones as source of wisdom on current events, an informed, politically astute interviewer probably is the last thing you'd want. |
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++
+++++++++ Your wish to censor Alex Jones is implicit in the post, your "regret" that he is appearing on a show with such a large listening audience reveals that. Your supposition that it is George Norry's responsibility to "expose" Jones indicates a lack of understanding regarding the genre of the show, it's not CNN's Crossfire or NBC's Hardball. Also, the audience can call in and engage Jones directly if they so desire. If you were intellectually honest you would admit that you would relish the opportunity to censor Alex Jones. Your assumption that the listeners aren't able to determine the validity of what Jones says, what is true or not true, also betrays an arrogance all too common amongst people such as yourself. Mack Let's see if I'm too "arrogant" to follow your line of reasoning. After admitting that I listen to Jones on SW, I express concern (regret, if you want) that Jones is getting three hours on Coast to Coast because I question Noorey's ability to appropriately question Jones on some of his political fantasies. This, in your mind, equates to advocating censoring Jones, which I did not. When asked directly where I advocating censoring him, you say it's "implied." In other words, I didn't say it, but we'll pretend that wishing Jones would appear in a different forum with a better interviewer equates to calling for censorship (i.e., taking him off the air). Having put words in my mouth, and trying to pass that off as "implied," you now suggest that *I'm* intellectually dishonest and jump back on the censorship horse. So let's resolve that once and for all--I'd like nothing better than to see Jones get as much personal coverage as possible by seasoned interviewers who don't have Noorey's penchant for tossing softballs. Noorey is a decent guy with a good show within it's realm, but wouldn't it be great to hear Jones explaining the "Secrets of the Bohemian Grove" to Mike Wallace? It also strikes me as rather strange that you consider it "arrogant" to desire that Jones be interviewed by someone with sufficient knowledge of politics to put his "ideas" to the test, rather than someone whose idea of a credible source is Richard C. Hoagland. Still, you don't have to be arrogant to recognize that for anyone who regards Jones as source of wisdom on current events, an informed, politically astute interviewer probably is the last thing you'd want. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Okay so rather than keeping Jone's off the air you want him on as much as possible with "seasoned interviewers." I think you'd be surprised at how well Alex does in that setting. I've heard him interviewed on Denver's KOA radio station by Rick Barber (one of the best unknown radio interviwers in the business) and Alex was outstanding. He was scheduled to do one hour and the host kept asking him to stay for another hour and another. He ended up doing four hours and effectively backing all his assertions with mainstream media sources. Really quite an impressive performance by Jones. As for Mike Wallace, yes I'm sure you would love to see that, as would every other foe of Jone's. Wallace and 60 Minutes tape anywhere from 3-6 hours of interview with their victim and then edit it down to fit a 15 minute segment. Cutting and splicing to make their target look like a complete fool and them like geniuses. The oldest trick in the book and the reason 60 minutes won't do live interviews. And this mercifully brings to a close this thread, for me anyway. Best wishes. Mack |
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:11:26 -0600, Mack Sambo wrote
(in message ) : Okay so rather than keeping Jone's off the air you want him on as much as possible with "seasoned interviewers." I think you'd be surprised at how well Alex does in that setting. I've heard him interviewed on Denver's KOA radio station by Rick Barber (one of the best unknown radio interviwers in the business) and Alex was outstanding. He was scheduled to do one hour and the host kept asking him to stay for another hour and another. He ended up doing four hours and effectively backing all his assertions with mainstream media sources. But - as Alex "Drooling" Jones has explained - all the mass media is leftwing, communist, socialistic, fascistic new world order and can't be trusted. And, as you wrote, " . . . and effectively backing all his assertions with mainstream media sources." So The Drooler is "backing all his assertions" with "mainstream media sources" that can't be trusted? The strange little man who listened to The Drooler and then broke into the Bohemian Grove, armed and then went to sleep, is an absolutely perfect personification of The Drooler's "true believer" listeners. Gray Shockley -------------------------------------------------------- See Eric Hoffer for your biography. |
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:54:34 -0500, "T. Early"
wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: "David" wrote in message .. . A great way to hide a crime is to make it so outrageous no one would believe it. Actually, a great way to make people believe something totally ridiculous is to invent out of nothing a crime so outrageous that those who want to believe it will claim that a great way to hide a crime is to make it so outrageous no one would believe it. I'm getting dizzy... -- V.G. Change pobox dot alaska to gci. "People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to harrass rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker (This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM) Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield. |
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 19:14:08 -0900, "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)"
wrote: On Sun, 7 Mar 2004 18:54:34 -0500, "T. Early" wrote in alt.fan.art-bell: "David" wrote in message . .. A great way to hide a crime is to make it so outrageous no one would believe it. Actually, a great way to make people believe something totally ridiculous is to invent out of nothing a crime so outrageous that those who want to believe it will claim that a great way to hide a crime is to make it so outrageous no one would believe it. I'm getting dizzy... Who wouldn't be? -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULTŪ member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Carl, you can lead a kook to wisdom, but you can't make him learn" - Irony Alert |
Gray Shockley wrote in message s.com...
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 19:11:26 -0600, Mack Sambo wrote (in message ) : Okay so rather than keeping Jone's off the air you want him on as much as possible with "seasoned interviewers." I think you'd be surprised at how well Alex does in that setting. I've heard him interviewed on Denver's KOA radio station by Rick Barber (one of the best unknown radio interviwers in the business) and Alex was outstanding. He was scheduled to do one hour and the host kept asking him to stay for another hour and another. He ended up doing four hours and effectively backing all his assertions with mainstream media sources. But - as Alex "Drooling" Jones has explained - all the mass media is leftwing, communist, socialistic, fascistic new world order and can't be trusted. And, as you wrote, " . . . and effectively backing all his assertions with mainstream media sources." So The Drooler is "backing all his assertions" with "mainstream media sources" that can't be trusted? The strange little man who listened to The Drooler and then broke into the Bohemian Grove, armed and then went to sleep, is an absolutely perfect personification of The Drooler's "true believer" listeners. Gray Shockley See Eric Hoffer for your biography. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Guess the guy can't win. If he sites alternatie sources he is dismissed as a crackpot. So he uses "mainstream" sources to satisfy the cynics like you. Your logic is easily turned around on you. If the mainstream media isn't what Jone's claims and is objective and truthful with no hidden agenda, and he uses it to confirm what he puts forth then his assertions must be credible. YAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWNNNNN and *PLONK* Mack See Lenin's definition of "USEFUL IDIOT" for your biography. |
DGH,
TONIGHT - Thursday March 11th, 2004 ALEX JONES is on Tonight with George Noory C2C-AM= http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2004/03/11.html Alex Jones (http://www.infowars.com) is a leading expert on the Patriot Act, and will discuss privacy and the current state of our civil liberties. He'll also share his insights on Bohemian Grove and its relationship to secret societies. ALEX-JONES= http://www.prisonplanet.com Plus there is "Richard C. Hoagland" for the first hour. RCH= http://www.enterprisemission.com/ Listen-Up-People ~ RHF .. .. = = = "Da Green Hornet" wrote in message = = = sgroups.com... "Frank Minutillo" wrote in message news:fhk2c.36449$Ri6.5230@lakeread04... I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo His act is to act crazy and sell videotapes to suckers. He's in the same league as scam artists that sell gold coins as a hedge against an economic meltdown. He'll also be the special guest for THREE HOURS on Coast to Coast AM with George Noorey on either Wednesday or Thursday of next week. www.coasttocoastam.com Should be good for a few laughs I'd guess. : ) .. |
"T. Early" wrote in message ...
"Da Green Hornet" wrote in message groups.com... "Frank Minutillo" wrote in message news:fhk2c.36449$Ri6.5230@lakeread04... I can't find Alex Jones anywhere lately. His website says 3.210 from 10:00 CST but he's not there. Does anyone know where he is. I miss the nut. Frank Minutillo His act is to act crazy and sell videotapes to suckers. He's in the same league as scam artists that sell gold coins as a hedge against an economic meltdown. He'll also be the special guest for THREE HOURS on Coast to Coast AM with George Noorey on either Wednesday or Thursday of next week. www.coasttocoastam.com Should be good for a few laughs I'd guess. : ) I get a chuckle out of Jones on his own program, but when he crosses over to "legitimate" (or at least semi-legitimate) media, it annoys me. Isn't Mr.Hillbilly Heroin Rush(Oxycontin)Limbaugh on ABC ? Whak job Rush attracted the nuts that kisten to him while he was spewing stoned out of his mind. Thats legitamte allright. Noorey needs to stick to canals on Mars, ghostly apparitions, remote viewers, and weird viruses; he is way too credulous on political topics to donate three hours of a pretty highly rated program to Jones. Limbaugh gets about that much time doesn't he? |
I like Alex Jones. I don't always agree with him, but I like him.
You're listening, and I listen. At least the guy has passion about something. In case you haven't noticed, bad tings are happening in the world. Some people have indifferance abouding. Others are affected by the events of our time. Then there's the whole issue of solutions. Alex wants the bad stuff to stop. Nice idea, but the "bad stuff" is just getting started. Darren, http://www.geocities.com/apocalyptic121/index.html |
In article , running dogg wrote:
Dan wrote: - Commenting on the tragic shootings in the Minnesota high school suggested " every classroom have a gun next to the teacher in some safe lock box thing.. - Trouble starts in teh school with firearms, teaher just pushes a button out comes the Gun & then *BOOM* -- No More trouble.. Self firing guns? Push a button and the gun does the rest? And when the gun kills all the innocent students in the class too, the parents can't sue because "it was the gun's fault"? Guns don't kill, people kill. Also, if the gun box can be opened with the push of a button, it's not exactly in a "safe lock box", is it? There are lock boxes with five digit push button combinations. These are the same people who suggested arming first graders after that girl was shot in Michigan. Do you think a six year old can be taught to use a gun responsibly, considering all the six year olds who play with "toy" guns only to discover that the gun is NOT a toy and that their best friend is dead? It's called training. Kids should be taught to not touch a gun and get an adult to take care of it. That's what I love about kooks, they're so easy to make fun of because they don't have the mental capacity to think through their inane ideas. Put a kook in front of a mike, speaking off the cuff, and it's even more fun. That's why SW radio is Kook Central, any kook who can pay the dough can get on the air and make a total fool of himself (usually a him, except in rare cases). You sound like a kook yourself at times. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
I worked for the local school system a year ago and I was amazed at how
easily people could walk into and out of our local buildings through a variety of doors and open windows. Pre-Columbine schools weren't designed with security as the primary factor. So it all comes down to the desire of the potential shooter. If they truly feel no remorse about taking the life of another human being, and they don't fear their own deaths, then there's really nothing to stop this horrible tragedy from happening again and again. God help us all. |
In World War Two,the Dutch govt was experimenting with a "self fireing"
gun.It was designed to be dropped from the air via Aircraft and it was suppose to stick straight up in the ground via a spike that was attatched to the bottom of the gun and that was suppose to automatically start the gun revolving around and around horizontaly and be shooting at the enemy.But they figured it might wind up killing more Dutchies than the enemy,so they abandoned that bright idea. cuhulin |
When I went to public school from 1946 to 1958,we didn't know what
security was.Us kids had to be our own security.We would get in fights,but after a couple of hours we forgot who we was fighting with.We carried all kinds of things in our pockets too.Cigarette lighters,pocket knifes,you name it.We never carried any guns or dope or drugs to school though,nobody went around shooting up the schools with guns either. cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com