Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Arthur Pozner" wrote : About the merits of the R-390 ================================= Somebody else added in a comment about the R-390/R-390A. However, there is a *world* of difference between the R-390 and R-390A. Anyone who has owned both will know all about it. Audio quality and filtering are among the most dramatic differences. But, as long as we're talking audio .. many will also remember the Hammarlund SP-600 .. another boat anchor. It was another analog receiver, but not with the odometer-like frequency readout like the R-390 & R-390A. Instead, the SP-600 had several bands covering up to 50 MHz, but the "bandspread" dial was soooo widely indicated, that (e.g. on 60 meters) each single KHz could be indicated by about 3/8-inch on the large main tuning knob rim. Pretty derned good for a boat anchor. But,the audio .... the audio ... could not be matched by anything either then or now. And, I have owned (literally) every major performer receiver since the war (WW2). |