Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 10th 04, 04:34 PM
Lord Whiz
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Arthur Pozner" wrote in message
...
|
How
| could anyone even compare any Collins design/product with a
portable?
| I am outraged. This is absurd.
| The audio reproduction and flexibility of having so many controls is
| nothing remotely available on ANY receiver I encountered in
solid
| state receivers (commercial/milspec/consumer/amateur).
----

As the poster alluded above, the R-390 was a Collins design, and
they also made some. But, the R-390 was a military specification
number, and it was made by several companies, including:
Stewart-Warner, Motorola, Electronic Assistance Corp, as well
as Collins. There were, indeed, varying points of difference in
quality .. but, all of them met the 'military specs' which did not
necessarily mean that was the best which the receiver could do.
Military Spec was a minimal common denominator all had to meet.|


  #2   Report Post  
Old March 10th 04, 10:31 PM
Arthur Pozner
 
Posts: n/a
Default

R-390(non A) does not have the audio output power level of
SP-600. It has 0.5 W vs 2W. The LC filters in wide IF position must
be very similar- 16Kc and 13Kc (slightly more in Collins).
Just for fun I connected Sony 7600 to a Hi-fi stereo not long ago.
Sounded pretty decent for a portable on SW (especially with the synch
on). Did synchronous detectors exist in the
fifties?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017