|
N8KDV's Smoking Pol Pot
Steve Lare,
You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post: __________________________________________________ ___________ From: N8KDV ) Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump suit View: Complete Thread (6 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST Nobody You Know wrote: wrote: BBC is mute on this.. anyone else pick up anything...? http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him off. It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though... technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed. __________________________________________________ ______________ Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds to find the post. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Yep, Steve. What you think of that? You going to take that laying down?
Get after him Steven, come on post something nasty!!!! Burr I'm going to dinner, hope to see a lot of post to this tread when I get back!!! Michael Bryant wrote: Steve Lare, You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post: __________________________________________________ ___________ From: N8KDV ) Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump suit View: Complete Thread (6 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST Nobody You Know wrote: wrote: BBC is mute on this.. anyone else pick up anything...? http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him off. It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though... technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed. __________________________________________________ ______________ Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds to find the post. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Steve denied making the post exactly one year from the day he made the post.
That's an interesting coincidence, no? We're actually compiling a dossier on you, Steve. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: Steve denied making the post exactly one year from the day he made the post. That's an interesting coincidence, no? We're actually compiling a dossier on you, Steve. I denied nothing. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael 'I must be on drugs, I can't read' Bryant wrote: Steve Lare, You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post: __________________________________________________ ___________ From: N8KDV ) Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump suit View: Complete Thread (6 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST Nobody You Know wrote: wrote: BBC is mute on this.. anyone else pick up anything...? http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him off. It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though... technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed. __________________________________________________ ______________ Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds to find the post. Good for you fat boy. Now, let's deal with the facts. Here are your original posts: "It's hilarious how you amuse yourself in such a stupid. Learn that in the military. I mean you certainly had a lot of time on your hands while listening to Pol Pot, right?" And... "You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original post will you go away?" Here was my response: "I'm waiting fat boy, produce the post that said I was 'listening' to Pol Pot. I was not 'listening to', nor was I involved in 'monitoring' Pol Pot". Now as you can see I responded to your posts in an honest way. You on the other hand cannot read nor comprehend. Do you see your error? No? Well it's obvious that you do not understand the difference between the words 'looking for' and 'listening to' and 'monitoring'. You claimed I was 'listening to'... and I denied that. You claimed I was 'monitoring'... and I denied that. You have deluded yourself into thinking you've produced something. You have not! Please stop your shuck-and-jive. |
Michael 'I can't comprehend' Bryant wrote: Steve denied making the post exactly one year from the day he made the post. I did not deny making that post Bryant. Learn to read, and comprehend! That's an interesting coincidence, no? No. We're actually compiling a dossier on you, Steve. What dossier might that be retard? The times I point out that you are incorrect? |
|
|
-=jd=- wrote: On Tue 09 Mar 2004 01:06:55a, N8KDV wrote in message : Michael 'I must be on drugs, I can't read' Bryant wrote: Steve Lare, You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post: __________________________________________________ _________ __ From: N8KDV ) Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump suit View: Complete Thread (6 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST Nobody You Know wrote: wrote: BBC is mute on this.. anyone else pick up anything...? http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...020/binladen03 0307.html No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him off. It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though... technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed. __________________________________________________ _________ _____ Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds to find the post. Good for you fat boy. Now, let's deal with the facts. Here are your original posts: "It's hilarious how you amuse yourself in such a stupid. Learn that in the military. I mean you certainly had a lot of time on your hands while listening to Pol Pot, right?" And... "You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original post will you go away?" Here was my response: "I'm waiting fat boy, produce the post that said I was 'listening' to Pol Pot. I was not 'listening to', nor was I involved in 'monitoring' Pol Pot". Now as you can see I responded to your posts in an honest way. You on the other hand cannot read nor comprehend. Do you see your error? No? Well it's obvious that you do not understand the difference between the words 'looking for' and 'listening to' and 'monitoring'. You claimed I was 'listening to'... and I denied that. You claimed I was 'monitoring'... and I denied that. You have deluded yourself into thinking you've produced something. You have not! Please stop your shuck-and-jive. Damn! LOL! You suckered a (presumably) detail-oriented debate coach? Amazing isn't it! He walked right into the wall. Normally, I wouldn't interject, but that's pretty darn funny! When your opponent stops seething, he may even get a chuckle out of it himself! -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) |
Michael Bryant wrote: from: N8KDV Nice try... but I gotcha! The only thing you got is a lying problem. And your counter-effort is, as usual, pathetic. Once again, what did I lie about? No counter effort, simply the facts. You do like facts don't you Mr. Debate Coach? Good night, liar. Good night fabricator! |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV Date: 3/9/04 1:43 AM Eastern Damn! LOL! You suckered a (presumably) detail-oriented debate coach? Amazing isn't it! He walked right into the wall. Talking to yourself, again, Steve? No retard, I was responding to JD's post. You really can't read can you? |
|
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You do like facts don't you Mr. Debate Coach? I know one fact: I undrestand why you wouldn't promise to leave the group if I produced real facts. Yes, you did produce real facts! No doubt about it! However the facts you produced had nothing to do with your claims! Gotcha! Stop the shuck-and-jive boy. Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nojunk" to reply) |
Michael Bryant wrote: From: N8KDV You do like facts don't you Mr. Debate Coach? I know one fact: I undrestand why you wouldn't promise to leave the group if I produced real facts. No, here is your post: "You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original post will you go away?" You made no statement about producing 'real facts'. Stop the shuck-and-jive. |
|
In article ,
says... Michael 'I must be on drugs, I can't read' Bryant wrote: Steve Lare, You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post: __________________________________________________ ___________ From: N8KDV ) Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump suit View: Complete Thread (6 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST Nobody You Know wrote: wrote: BBC is mute on this.. anyone else pick up anything...? http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him off. It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though... technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed. __________________________________________________ ______________ Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds to find the post. Good for you fat boy. Now, let's deal with the facts. Here are your original posts: "It's hilarious how you amuse yourself in such a stupid. Learn that in the military. I mean you certainly had a lot of time on your hands while listening to Pol Pot, right?" And... "You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original post will you go away?" Here was my response: "I'm waiting fat boy, produce the post that said I was 'listening' to Pol Pot. I was not 'listening to', nor was I involved in 'monitoring' Pol Pot". Now as you can see I responded to your posts in an honest way. You on the other hand cannot read nor comprehend. Do you see your error? No? Well it's obvious that you do not understand the difference between the words 'looking for' and 'listening to' and 'monitoring'. You claimed I was 'listening to'... and I denied that. You claimed I was 'monitoring'... and I denied that. You have deluded yourself into thinking you've produced something. You have not! Please stop your shuck-and-jive. Seems like you're tap dancing Steve... BDK |
BDK wrote: In article , says... Michael 'I must be on drugs, I can't read' Bryant wrote: Steve Lare, You suggested I was on drugs for suggesting that you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. Then how do you explain the dollowing archived post: __________________________________________________ ___________ From: N8KDV ) Subject: "I always had this dream of seeing him in an orange prisoners jump suit View: Complete Thread (6 articles) Original Format Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: 2003-03-08 18:42:11 PST Nobody You Know wrote: wrote: BBC is mute on this.. anyone else pick up anything...? http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/w...den030307.html No wonder we can't catch him, our blabbermouth news media keeps tipping him off. It's just a matter of time. It's difficult. I spent some time looking for Pol Pot...never got him... that's the way it happens. This time though... technology may trip up Mr. Bin Laden... I have my fingers crossed. __________________________________________________ ______________ Short-term memory loss, Steve? Anyone can check out Google. Took me 60 seconds to find the post. Good for you fat boy. Now, let's deal with the facts. Here are your original posts: "It's hilarious how you amuse yourself in such a stupid. Learn that in the military. I mean you certainly had a lot of time on your hands while listening to Pol Pot, right?" And... "You claimed, earlier, that you were invloved in efforts to monitor Pol Pot when you were in the military. Going to deny thay, now? If I produce the original post will you go away?" Here was my response: "I'm waiting fat boy, produce the post that said I was 'listening' to Pol Pot. I was not 'listening to', nor was I involved in 'monitoring' Pol Pot". Now as you can see I responded to your posts in an honest way. You on the other hand cannot read nor comprehend. Do you see your error? No? Well it's obvious that you do not understand the difference between the words 'looking for' and 'listening to' and 'monitoring'. You claimed I was 'listening to'... and I denied that. You claimed I was 'monitoring'... and I denied that. You have deluded yourself into thinking you've produced something. You have not! Please stop your shuck-and-jive. Seems like you're tap dancing Steve... Really? In what way? I simply denied what he was stating at the time. He was fabricating, and accusing me of stating what I did not indeed state. If you don't understand that, then perhaps you lack the same reading and comprehension skills as Michael Bryant. Sorry if I have to put that in such a succinct manner, but I have only the facts to deal with here. If you go back and read Bryant's posts you'll see that he's been the one 'tap dancing'. He twists words in every response. Show me where I'm wrong! Go Googling! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
you said you were involved in
the search for Pol Pot. - Whaaa ?? - Doubntful.. _ Probably a Cook, or a truck loader , or some " Admin typ guy." Why else would he be so obsessed with this Stupid BS.. Something in Bryandt rings a bell with him, which he can't stand in himself - & So He lashes out at Bryandt instead of loking withinn |
I spent some time looking for Pol
Pot...never got him. Whaa...? _ Dont belive it _ Spelll it out |
Chandler7600 wrote: you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. - Whaaa ?? - Doubntful.. _ Probably a Cook, or a truck loader , or some " Admin typ guy." Why else would he be so obsessed with this Stupid BS.. Something in Bryandt rings a bell with him, which he can't stand in himself - & So He lashes out at Bryandt instead of loking withinn Hardly the case. At any rate, your spelling needs a bit of attention. Get back to me when you get things corrected on your end. |
Chandler7600 wrote: you said you were involved in the search for Pol Pot. - Whaaa ?? - Doubntful.. _ Probably a Cook, or a truck loader , or some " Admin typ guy." Why else would he be so obsessed with this Stupid BS.. Something in Bryandt rings a bell with him, which he can't stand in himself - & So He lashes out at Bryandt instead of loking withinn Or are you indeed yourself MWBRYANT? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com