Radio New Zealand International
 

Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a
tough catch on this frequency for some weeks.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

17675 Khz

Pretty clear signal here in NYC..

& agree, been a Long time since they've been so clear


Dan

In article Jav3c.530730$na.1298634@attbi_s04, "Brian Denley"
writes:


Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a
tough catch on this frequency for some weeks.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Brian Denley wrote:

Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a
tough catch on this frequency for some weeks.

Surely you must mean 17675? And yes, they are indeed coming in well.



--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

N8KDV wrote:


Surely you must mean 17675? And yes, they are indeed coming in well.



Steve:
Sorry for the typo - of course it's 17675 KHz.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Brian Denley wrote:
Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC).
They have been a tough catch on this frequency for some
weeks.

Thanks for the heads up, Brian, on 17675. It's not moving the S-meter here
in Toronto but provided an interesting comparison of my single vs cascaded
DX-394 radios using AM or ECSS on the second, AM on the first. The fading
on ECSS is much less than on the AM from either radio. The second radio
takes the 455kHz output of the first.

Tom

Brian, that is a FINE radio collection.

-- Stinger

"Brian Denley" wrote in message
news:Jav3c.530730$na.1298634@attbi_s04...
Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a
tough catch on this frequency for some weeks.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Stinger:
Thanks! One more and the wife promises to have me committed :o)

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

"Stinger" wrote in message
...
Brian, that is a FINE radio collection.

-- Stinger

"Brian Denley" wrote in message
news:Jav3c.530730$na.1298634@attbi_s04...
Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been
a
tough catch on this frequency for some weeks.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Brian Denley wrote:

Nice to heard RNZI again ot 17657 KHz (~S9 @ 2:30 UTC). They have been a
tough catch on this frequency for some weeks.

A sure sign of spring. More reliable than seeing the first robin.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

17675 Khz

Pretty clear signal here in NYC..

& agree, been a Long time since they've been so clear


Brian & Dan,
I hear them here at my QTH in Cincinnnati,Ohio on my Hammarlund 140X and on my
DX398 often, just about whenever I fish then for them.

It's always a solid copy. What states are you guys monitoring from, may I ask?

Surely you must mean 17675? And yes, they are indeed coming in well.

It *IS* 17675 'all the time.'

A sure sign of spring. More reliable than seeing the first robin.

Starman
Isn't that the truth, didn't think of it that way. But indeed, the seasons
are changing. :-)

Brian Denley wrote:

Dxluver wrote:
17675 Khz

Pretty clear signal here in NYC..

& agree, been a Long time since they've been so clear


Brian & Dan,
I hear them here at my QTH in Cincinnnati,Ohio on my Hammarlund 140X
and on my DX398 often, just about whenever I fish then for them.

It's always a solid copy. What states are you guys monitoring from,
may I ask?

Listening near Boston MA. RNZI has been virtually uncopyable here for some
time due to listening conditions.

Liberal Land... when your pal Kerry get's elected you can expect conditions to
get worse, radio and otherwise...

Out here in the Heartland though, we'll get by...

Time and time again...

DxAce wrote:
Brian Denley wrote:

Dxluver wrote:
17675 Khz

Pretty clear signal here in NYC..

& agree, been a Long time since they've been so clear


Brian & Dan,
I hear them here at my QTH in Cincinnnati,Ohio on my Hammarlund 140X
and on my DX398 often, just about whenever I fish then for them.

It's always a solid copy. What states are you guys monitoring from,
may I ask?

Listening near Boston MA. RNZI has been virtually uncopyable here
for some time due to listening conditions.

Liberal Land... when your pal Kerry get's elected you can expect
conditions to get worse, radio and otherwise...

Out here in the Heartland though, we'll get by...

Time and time again...

I can't stand Kerry - but then again anything's better than Bush.

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html

Brian Denley wrote:

Dxluver wrote:
17675 Khz

Pretty clear signal here in NYC..

& agree, been a Long time since they've been so clear


Brian & Dan,
I hear them here at my QTH in Cincinnnati,Ohio on my Hammarlund 140X
and on my DX398 often, just about whenever I fish then for them.

It's always a solid copy. What states are you guys monitoring from,
may I ask?

Listening near Boston MA. RNZI has been virtually uncopyable here for some
time due to listening conditions.

I've noticed that RNZI sometimes has a good signal in the evening to the
northeast US on 17675 while Radio Australia on 15240 can be quite weak.
Both frequencies have similar beam headings, so it's curious how the
propagation can be so different from two locations that aren't that far
apart in shortwave terms.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Liberal Land... when your pal Kerry get's elected you can expect conditions
to
get worse, radio and otherwise...

I know where you live Steve. Michigan. Right?

Dxluver wrote:

Liberal Land... when your pal Kerry get's elected you can expect conditions
to
get worse, radio and otherwise...

I know where you live Steve. Michigan. Right?

Yes, indeed I live in Michigan.